screen-shot-2019-11-22-at-2-43-05-pm-150x150-8208452Thanks to Medicaid over-spending, New York’s state budget gaps have blown up to their highest levels since the Great Recession.

That’s the main takeaway from the state’s FY 2020 Mid-Year Financial Plan Update—issued today (23 days behind statutory schedule) by Governor Andrew Cuomo’s Division of the Budget (DOB).

Back in July, the state’s first quarterly report pegged the out-year budget gaps at $4 billion for fiscal 2021, which begins next April 1, and up to $4.7 billion by fiscal 2023.

Today’s plan reveals the shortfall for the coming year has grown to $6 billion—the biggest at the mid-year point since Governor David Paterson’s projected $9 billion gap in November 2010, which had grown even larger by the time Cuomo took office a few weeks later. The out-year gaps for fiscal 2022 and 2023 have ballooned to $7.5 billion and $8.5 billion respectively, also the largest since the recession.

But this emerging problem isn’t due to an economic downturn or a fall in revenues. Today’s plan makes no change at all to projected tax receipts; in fact, it reflects a $428 million increase in projected miscellaneous receipts and federal grants, over the amounts projected in the First Quarterly Update released in August.

The problem, in a single word, is Medicaid.

In July, Empire Center’s Bill Hammond first called attention to the fact that Cuomo rolled over $1.7 billion in Medicaid payments from the end of 2019 to the start of fiscal 2020. And as today’s update confirms, this has compounded into a $4 billion problem in the current fiscal year. The Mid-Year Update lays out two steps for closing the current-year deficit:

  • $2.2 billion will be eliminated through a “a permanent adjustment to the timing of payments … consistent with contractual terms and past practice.” In other words, the rollover will be converted into a permanent lag—not unprecedented, but on a larger scale than seen in the past.
  • $1.8 billion will be erased by a “savings plan” that “may include across the board reductions in rates paid to providers and health plans, reductions in discretionary payments, and other actions that can be executed administratively in the current fiscal year.”

Further details of those “savings” won’t be released until the Governor presents his FY 2021 Executive Budget in January, but today’s plan does say that only half the savings will be recurring. He’ll then need to come up with another $3 billion in Medicaid cuts to stay under his “global cap” on health care spending in FY 2021.

And beyond Medicaid reductions, to stay under his self-imposed state operating funds spending cap of 2 percent in 2021 without raising taxes or fees, Cuomo will need to reduce projected spending next year by $3 billion in addition to those $3 billion in Medicaid reductions cited above.

Keep in mind the largest single category of state operating funds spending—larger, even, than Medicaid—is aid to local public schools. Cuomo’s Financial Plan assumes a school aid increase of $1 billion— a not-unhealthy 4 percent growth rate, or double the current inflation trend, at a time when pupil enrollment statewide is continuing to sink. But school advocacy groups will be pushing for much more—an increase of at least $2 billion. And that will be just one of the fights looming on next year’s budget horizon.

Over his first two terms, even adjusting for budgetary accounting gimmicks, Cuomo held the total average state-funded budget growth to a lower inflation-adjusted level than any governor since Hugh Carey (1975-83). But the looming 2020 budget fight will be, by far, the greatest test of his commitment to fiscal discipline since first budget, back in 2011.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More

Past Due: It’s Time to Float New York’s Statutory Interest Rates

Adopting a more neutral statutory interest rate—like the rate under federal law—would address a distorting factor in the cost-benefit analysis of pursuing a meritorious appeal in the Empire State. Read More

Four years later, New York’s COVID hangover lingers

Just in time for the pandemic's fourth anniversary, the state's latest monthly jobs data offer fresh evidence of the lingering economic damage wrought by New York's heavy-handed response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Read More

NYS Seeks Spin Doctor To Fight Climate Law Critics

New York state energy officials are taking the exceptional step of hiring a public relations outfit, using $500,000 per year of public money, to "maintain a positive narrative" and “respond to negative viewpoints” about the state’s 2019 climate law. Read More