screen-shot-2016-07-28-at-1-27-49-pm-300x242-6188007New York’s hospitals collectively rank dead last among the 50 states in a new report card from the federal government, an Empire Center analysis shows.

On Wednesday, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its first-ever star ratings for hospitals across the country, based on 64 measures of quality.

Just one New York institution, the Hospital for Special Surgery, received the top rating of five stars, and only 12 received four stars. Forty-nine of the state’s hospitals were rated average with three stars, 58 got two stars and 35 got one star.

That translates to an average score of 2.26, which was the lowest of any state, the analysis found. Just above New York were the hospitals of Nevada (2.29), New Jersey (2.47), Florida (2.62), and Connecticut (2.64).

The states with the best averages were South Dakota (4.12), Idaho (3.65), Wisconsin (3.65), Minnesota (3.53), and Delaware (3.50).

The average hospital score for the District of Columbia was lower than New York’s, as were those of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands.

The Empire Center’s full analysis of average state scores is available here.

New York ranked low despite having one of the most expensive health-care systems in the U.S. Its per capita health-care spending ranked sixth among states as of 2012. As the Empire Center reported two weeks ago, its employer-sponsored health insurance premiums rose to second-highest in the country in 2015.

Results from the CMS rating system differed from previous hospital scorecards by U.S. News & World Report and others, giving higher marks in some cases to smaller, lesser-known institutions than the famous names.

Of the 12 four-star institutions in New York, for example, only two were among the traditionally elite hospitals of Manhattan: New York-Presbyterian and NYU Hospitals Center.

Helping drag down New York’s average were government-owned institutions. The 11 members of New York City Health + Hospitals received three two-star and eight one-star ratings. Of the three hospitals affiliated with the State University of New York, Stony Brook received a two star rating, and Syracuse and Brooklyn each received one star.

A bright spot was the city of Rochester, where all four of the hospitals rated received either three or four stars.

CMS said it lacked sufficient data to issue ratings for 25 of New York’s hospitals, including all of its Veterans Affairs hospitals. Hospitals specializing in cancer treatment, including Memorial Sloan Kettering in Manhattan and the state-owned Roswell Park in Buffalo, were exempt from the star-rating system.

Hospital officials in New York and across the country criticized CMS’ decision to issue star ratings. A spokesman for the Healthcare Association of New York State, a lobbying group for hospitals, told the Gannett News Service that the new report “oversimplifies the complexity of delivering high-quality care, uses flawed measures, fails to adjust for socio-demographic factors, and uses a methodology that cannot be replicated by hospitals or outside organizations.”

An analysis by Kaiser Health News confirmed that safety net and teaching hospitals tended to score lower on average.

However, both Mississippi, which is the nation’s poorest state, and Massachusetts, with a concentration of teaching hospitals, outperformed New York in the report card.

UPDATE: Here is a detailed response from Kenneth Raske, president of the Greater New York Hospital Association, representing 160 hospitals in the New York City metropolitan region. (The city’s hospitals were lower-scoring than the state as a whole in the federal report card, with its 38 rated hospitals averaging 1.68 stars.) Raske’s response raises tough questions about CMS’ methodology.

The hospital industry is justifiably angry at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for posting its overall hospital star ratings on the Hospital Compare website because the results have little face validity.

The well-recognized US News and World Report Best Hospitals highly ranks an above-average share of New York hospitals both on its honor roll and in individual specialties; yet CMS ranks New York hospitals near the bottom.

This is primarily because CMS measures only very routine aspects of care, completely ignoring the world-class tertiary care that distinguishes New York hospitals. In addition, CMS provides no risk adjustment for social, economic, and demographic challenges that affect a disproportionate number of hospitals in New York, and CMS inappropriately gives equal weight to clinical outcomes and patient experience surveys.

For example, data in the new report card show that New York hospitals have among the lowest mortality rates in the country. But this is masked by readmission rates that appear too high because CMS fails to risk adjust for socio-economic challenges, and patient survey results that appear too low because CMS makes no allowance for the impact that chronically underfunding safety net hospitals has on patient experience.

Moreover, the outcomes for very small hospitals are not real because CMS reports national average results instead of actual results when volume is too low be reliable. Indeed, among the best-performing (“5-star”) hospitals in the new report card, roughly 60% have fewer than 100 beds, 60% have virtually no poor patients, one-third have no emergency room (the portal for poor and uninsured patients), and half are missing data for at least one key element of care.

We will continue to partner with the American Hospital Association in urging CMS to develop a more fair and accurate ratings system.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

The CDC’s Nursing Home Death Count Is Even Less Complete Than New York’s

The result is that a major public health disaster affecting New York's nursing home residents is not being accurately documented by either of the agencies responsible for protecting them – because state officials are refusing to share the true numbers, and federal officials haven't yet asked for them. Read More

The DOJ’s Probe of Coronavirus in Nursing Homes Appears to Leave Out Most Victims

The U.S. Justice Department's newly announced inquiry into coronavirus in New York's nursing homes comes with a crucial caveat: It will look only at government-operated facilities, which represent a small fraction of the state's nursing-home industry. Read More

State’s Per-Recipient Medicaid Spending Rises to 3rd Highest in the U.S.

New York's per-recipient Medicaid spending has soared to the nation's third highest rate, a sign of fiscal trouble for one of the state's most important programs. Read More

New York Medicaid Spending Is Projected to Jump 6% in Fiscal Year 2021 (UPDATED)

Despite a round of cost-cutting this spring, New York's Medicaid spending is on track to jump by 6 percent this year thanks to a massive influx of federal aid. Read More

New York Has Widened Its Lead in Per-Capita Spending on Medicaid

New York's per-capita Medicaid spending soared to more than double the nationwide rate in 2018, widening its gap with the other 49 states. Read More

New York’s Medicaid Enrollment Surges to an All-Time High

New York's Medicaid program is growing at its fastest rate in six years, with a quarter-million additional enrollees landing in the safety-net health plan during the first three months of the coronavirus pandemic.  Read More

New York’s Health Premiums Remain Among the Highest in the U.S.

The average cost of New Yorkers' health benefits increased by less than the national average in 2019 but remained among the highest in the U.S., according to recently published federal data. Read More

New York’s Medicaid Roller Coaster Takes an Unusual Turn

The state's Medicaid spending was significantly lower than projected in the first quarter, but that's not necessarily a positive sign for state finances. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.