cuomo_250x-239x300-9931912Governor Cuomo’s warnings about how repealing the Affordable Care Act would affect New York should be read with caution.

On Wednesday – as the U.S. Senate took its first step toward unwinding Obamacare – Cuomo’s office said ACA repeal would cause 2.7 million New Yorkers to lose coverage and cost the state budget $3.7 billion.

But those two numbers are based on conflicting assumptions about how the repeal process will play out – a nuance that his press release did not make clear, but which Health Department officials explained later.

The officials raised the possibility that repeal could have dramatic and unintended consequences for the state’s Medicaid program. Unlike most other states, New York expanded its version of Medicaid going back years before the ACA. It did so under a series of waivers granted by the federal Department of Health and Human Services, which were superseded when the new law took effect in 2014.

Thus, if Washington repeals Obamacare without reinstating a waiver, New York’s Medicaid eligibility rules could revert to the pre-waiver baseline, officials said.

Currently, New York’s program covers most adults with children up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, and childless able-bodied adults up to 100 percent of FPL. Under a scenario in which the ACA is repealed and no waiver is granted, eligibility for adults with children could be limited to 94 percent of FPL, and able-bodied childless adults would no longer qualify at all.

That would end coverage for 1.9 million New Yorkers, officials said.

Another 220,000 people would lose access to private coverage they have purchased through New York’s ACA exchange, and 586,000 would lose coverage under the Essential Plan, a low-cost, government-funded health plan that was an optional benefit under Obamacare.

Other analyses of ACA repeal have assumed that Medicaid eligibility would revert to what it was in 2013.

Previous estimates by the Urban Institute and Charles Gaba of ACASignups.net have projected that 1.1 million New Yorkers would lose coverage under that scenario. [UPDATE: Charles Gaba has revised his estimate to 2.5 million.]

For its budget impact analysis, by contrast, the Cuomo administration assumed that New York would continue covering all or most of the people currently enrolled in Medicaid and the Essential Plan – without the benefit of extra federal aid that the ACA provided. In that case, the state would have to put up $3.7 billion or more of its own funds, officials said.

That number is roughly consistent with my own estimate and with that of state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

New York’s health insurance affordability problem gets worse

New York's health insurance affordability gap surged to a new high last year, with state residents paying an average of 16 percent more. Read More

New York’s Medicaid costs are soaring at double-digit rates

New York's already high Medicaid spending is growing at a double-digit rate for the second year in a row, recently released state figures show. After dipping during the first year o Read More

As the session winds down, watch for health costs to go up

The closing days of the legislative session could prove costly for New York health insurance consumers as lawmakers push a raft of proposals that would make coverage more expensive, harder to find, or both. Read More

Minimum wage for home care aides is likely to mean bigger raises for downstate than upstate

The newly enacted wage hike for home care aides is likely to increase workers' pay more than three times as much in the New York City area as in other parts of the state, according to a review of labor data. Read More

The flawed arguments behind ‘Fair Pay for Home Care’

As they contemplate a major increase in Medicaid spending on home care for the elderly and disabled, state legislators are relying on information that's outdated, incomplete or inaccurate – and neglecting to think through the predictable consequences. Read More

The debate over Medicaid home-care funding needs a reality check

The push in Albany to boost wages for home health aides is seemingly disconnected from the larger realities of the state’s long-term care system. As they , officials in the home care industry are warning that the state faces an of in-home caregivers Read More

Answers needed on Governor Hochul’s health-care budget

The health-care agenda laid out by Governor Hochul in her budget proposal this week leaves a lot of questions unanswered. Here are a few of them. Read More

Putting Governor Hochul’s $10 billion health-care ‘investment’ in context

In her State of the State address this week, Governor Hochul prominently called for a $10 billion "multi-year investment" in the state's health care system, including $4 billion earmarked for wages and bonuses, with a goal Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!