New Yorkers pay the second highest motor fuel taxes in the country*, largely to finance a dedicated state fund that was created over 20 years ago to continuously pay for construction and rehab of highways and bridges. However, as the state comptroller reports today, the Dedicated Highway and Bridge Trust Fund “no longer serves its original purpose of assuring reliable, predictable investment in the future of the State’s transportation infrastructure.”
“The dollars from New York’s motor fuel tax and other dedicated revenue sources, ostensibly intended for new transportation-related capital investment, are instead going primarily to repayment of debt from prior years and current day-to-day operational expenses,” the report says.
This is not a new story — today’s report is an update of one the comptroller issued a few years ago — but the diversion has been getting worse. State Sen. Thomas Libous has repeatedly introduced legislation that would protect the fund against raids, but Governor Andrew Cuomo has not addressed the core transportation funding issue here.
The breakdown of the dedicated fund is particularly disturbing in light of another trend: the crowding out of transportation capital by other “investments” in other areas.
In 2006, as depicted below, 55 percent of the state’s capital disbursements went for transportation purposes, including mass transit as well as highways and bridges. This year, the transportation share comes to 47 percent, and by 2019 it is slated to drop to just 44 percent. The expansion in capital spending projected under Cuomo’s 2015 Executive Budget would instead be devoted mainly to “economic development” purposes and to a proposed $2 billion Smart Schools Bond Act.
Under the 2014 enacted budget, capital expenditures on highways and bridges were projected to total $19.742 billion by 2018. But under Cuomo’s latest budget proposal, the five-year total would come to $19,462, a decrease of $280 million from what was projected just a few months ago.
About the Author
You may also like
One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor
Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph.
As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More
The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.
The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More
New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year
New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Read More
While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished
Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses.
While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More
Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts
New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More
A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign
While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More
New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal
A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels.
First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More
Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway
A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More