BOLTON LANDING—A former state tax commissioner who sat on both tax policy commissions convened last year by Governor Andrew Cuomo said it would be “a real challenge” for state officials to let New York’s “millionaires’ tax” expire on schedule at the end of 2017.
“The temporary millionaires’ tax raises a lot of money. … It’s hard for me to see the political situation accommodating a $3 billion tax cut which is just going to go to the top half-percent of the population,” said James Wetzler, a retired tax consultant who served in the administration of Mario Cuomo. “The question is, how are you going to pay for this tax cut, assuming you want to do it. There’s no attractive way to do it.”
Wetzler spoke during a Thursday morning panel at the Business Council of New York State’s annual conference at the Sagamore Hotel.
Alongside E.J. McMahon, who leads the fiscally conservative Empire Center for Public Policy and Ken Pokalsky, the Business Council’s top lobbyist, Wetzler spoke about some of the unimplemented recommendations in a tax simplification report issued last November and their potential political future.
If the panel yielded one clear conclusion, it’s that any tax code change costs require a significant political lift. The tax simplification report—the first of two reports on taxes issued last year, which the governor did his best not to draw any attention to—recommended (among other things) broadening the sales tax to include digital purchases of e-books and music on iTunes.
It was dead on arrival, the men noted, and likely will be if it comes up in the coming legislative session.
Pokalsky noted that the federal government is poised to reconsider some exemptions in the tax code that could include capping the amount of state income tax—which for wealthy New Yorkers is not a small number—that can be deducted from a federal tax return.
McMahon said that would be a “hair-on-fire moment for New York State.”
He attacked the current income tax system as a “mess,” and contrary to boasts by Cuomo and legislative leaders about changes they adopted at the end of 2011, described their renewal of most of the millionaires’ tax (married to rate decreases for middle-income taxpayers) as “set of expedient moves to raise revenue and quiet Occupy Wall Street—that was all it was, and the can was kicked down the road another three years.”
Cuomo’s second tax commission, which was co-chaired by former governor George Pataki, recommended a property tax freeze, but also stated that “some commission members favor setting aside any future surplus to help ensure the 6.85 [top income tax] rate is restored in 2018.”
Cuomo has said he favors cutting taxes when possible, but it’s difficult to predict whether the state’s fiscal plan will accommodate the millionaires’ tax sunset.
“We are at the early stages of what shapes up as the biggest state and city fiscal crisis since the Great Depression,” said E.J. McMahon of the Empire Center. “Borrowing and short-term cuts aside, the budget doesn’t chart any clear path out of it.” Read More
Bill Hammond, director of health policy at the conservative-leaning think tank the Empire Center, suggested this is because the proposed cuts are meant to slow the otherwise rapid growth in Medicaid spending, which means an increase is still possible. Read More
But according to the Empire Center, a non-profit group based in Albany, the overall impact of the Trump tax cuts actually benefited most state residents. Read More
As reported by the Empire Center last week, “The number of students enrolled in New York state public schools is the lowest recorded in 30 years.”
Since 2000, enrollment in public schools has declined by more than 10 percent statewide with most of it upstate as enrollment in New York City schools has increased 1.3 percent in the last 10 years. Students are not leaving to go to private or parochial schools either because they, too, are showing declines, down about 8 percent in the last decade. Read More
"The state is continuing its strategy of pursuing flashy mega-projects instead of making New York more attractive for all businesses. We're now in the second decade of this approach, and it's still failing to deliver the promised results," Girardin said. "This is the sort of economic development strategy that politicians turn to when they don't want to take on the tougher questions." Read More
The new replacement policy, which was tucked into a press release announcing new plate designs, has been criticized as a "revenue enhancer wrapped in a public relations ploy" by E.J. McMahon of the fiscally conservative Empire Center for Public Policy. Read More
"The 'current' $25 fee was for an optional plate choice," said E.J. McMahon, research director at the Empire Center for Public Policy. "The new fee will be mandatory -- the first time ever. This is a revenue grab under the guise of a PR stunt. Yes, the plates need replacement. But they don’t cost $25 apiece to manufacture." Read More
“A little series of mistakes in a program this big can add up to a lot of money in a hurry,” Hammond told The Post. “A quarter of a million dollars is a lot of money. It’s important that the auditors are looking at this and are pointing to things that could be fixed.” Read More