‘We’ve capped them — now let’s cut them.” That’s Gov. Cuomo’s slogan as he lobbies for legislative approval of the property-tax provisions of his proposed budget for the fiscal year that begins April 1.

Cuomo has, indeed, slapped a cap on local property-tax levies — a real accomplishment. But his budget wouldn’t actually “cut” them. Instead, it would shift a little more of the local tax burden to the state tax base — in the long run promoting more growth in local spending and taxes.

The governor’s convoluted plan would unfold in stages — the first temporary, the second permanent.

Stage One, implemented over the next two years, would send up to $1 billion to homeowners outside New York City who have incomes below $500,000. The state would issue rebate checks for any added taxes paid to a county, municipality or school district that holds its increase under the 2 percent tax cap.

In the second year, the rebate would be credited only for homeowners whose local governments stay under the cap and develop a plan to share or consolidate services.

The premise behind what Cuomo calls a tax “freeze” is that temporary rebates would give taxpayers an incentive to lean on local governments to reform themselves.

But the incentive doesn’t amount to all that much. For example, under Cuomo’s plan, the owner of a $400,000 house in Suffolk County might save $90 in combined county, town and special district taxes over two years. We’re supposed to believe a temporary $90 rebate check (or much less upstate) will make taxpayers feel a greater sense of urgency to reduce local government costs? Perhaps the governor should sweeten the deal with some Dunkin’ Donuts gift cards.

The school-tax rebate checks would be larger, averaging $300 or more over two years in downstate suburbs (and, again, less upstate). But when it comes to pressuring schools, the rebate would be a costly redundancy. Thanks to Cuomo’s tax-cap law, school-district voters are now empowered to freeze their own taxes by refusing to pass the annual district budget. From a school-board perspective, that’s a stronger and scarier incentive than any rebate check from Albany.

After two years, Cuomo’s rebate moves to Stage Two: $1 billion a year in permanent “circuit-breaker” income-tax credits that would offset some of the property taxes paid by some homeowners, if their incomes are low enough and their taxes high enough. (For New York City, the proposal includes $400 million a year in renters’ credits.)

So in the name of “cutting” property taxes, Cuomo actually would spend $1.4 billion to subsidize them — boosting the $3.4 billion dose of fiscal Novocain the state supplies to households under Gov. George Pataki’s School Tax Reduction (STAR) program, enacted in the late ’90s.

But by dulling the pain of high taxes for many homeowners, the circuit-breaker credit will only tend to increase their tolerance for more of the same — bad news for businesses and owners of multifamily properties, who won’t get any break.

The irony is that Cuomo has already done far more than his predecessors in this area. The tax cap (a provision Pataki pulled out of his original STAR plan) — finally has put New York property taxes, especially school taxes, on a lower long-term growth curve.

But as he gears up for a re-election campaign this year, Cuomo wants to take credit for short-term results. So he’s rolled out what amounts to Grandson of STAR.

As budget negotiations began this week, the Assembly favored the circuit-breaker alone. while the Senate preferred a permanent version of the rebate that targets money to local governments rather than individual homeowners. Whatever compromise emerges, it’s safe to assume Cuomo and legislative leaders will proclaim that they have brought forth historic property-tax relief for New York. Again.

Why do New York governors and legislators in both parties continue to offer expensive painkillers instead of real, cost-free cures for high property taxes? Because they’re unwilling to attack the main problem, which is unfunded state mandates — especially collective-bargaining laws that force public-employee pay to unsustainable levels. Until that changes, New Yorkers can expect more STARs in their eyes.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Calling Tax Cut “Theft,” Cuomo Continues to Push For Federal Bucks With Phony Math

The results of this week’s Georgia Senate runoffs, assuring Democrats will soon control both houses of Congress, as well as the White House, had to come as a huge relief to Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Read More

Students Need Reforms, Not HEROES

Families and businesses are watching their bottom lines and stretching each dollar. But House Democrats are pushing a plan to prevent America’s schools from doing the same thing. Read More

Washington shouldn’t fund NY’s “normal” budgets

With the coronavirus lockdown continuing to erode tax revenues, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has turned up the volume on his demands for a federal bailout of the New York state budget. In a weekend briefing, the governor repeated his estimate that the Empire State will need help closing a deficit of $10 billion to $15 billion. “I don’t have any funding to do what I normally do,” he said. Read More

Cuomo’s Plate Spinning

Governor Cuomo’s license plate design contest was a PR ploy masking a nickel-and-dime revenue raiser. Read More

How Cuomo is cooking New York’s books

When lawmakers in Albany passed the state budget last spring, Gov. Andrew Cuomo declared it “both timely and fiscally responsible.” Timely was true enough. But fiscally responsible? Not so much. Read More

Cuomo’s SALT Flop

By midnight Monday, more than 9 million New Yorkers will have filed their income tax returns for 2018. And most will then have cause to wonder what the Great New York SALT Panic of 2018 was all about. Read More

New York is looking at an ocean of red ink

New York’s new budget — the actual state-government expenditure plan, that is, as opposed to numerous side issues packaged with it — apparently came in close to Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s bottom line. Read More

NY’s ‘prevailing’ protection racket

Few public policies carry a more misleading moniker than New York’s “prevailing wage” law for public works projects — a job-destroying cost-escalator that Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and the State Legislature may be on the verge of expanding as part of their impending state budget deal. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!