Perception has a way of trumping reality in politics. Just ask former president George H.W. Bush, who was denied re-election in November 1992 largely because he was perceived as doing too little to end a relatively mild national recession that actually had been over for a year-and-a-half.

It was the elder Bush’s bad luck that payroll employment growth usually picks up steam a little later in the economic cycle — which, come to think of it, is similar to the situation his son now faces heading into the 2004 election.

Like Bill Clinton a dozen years ago, Sen. John Kerry hasn’t let the facts get in the way of some good old-fashioned demagoguery about jobs and the economy, especially in battleground states such as Ohio.

On domestic issues, much of Kerry’s rhetoric has focused on “outsourcing,” a subject of intense media hype even before Democrats made it one of their favorite symbols of all that’s wrong with President George W. Bush.

In fact, numerous studies show that those computer programmers in India, consumer call centers in the Philippines and other outsourcing outposts supposedly stealing our service jobs add up to little more than a blip on the American economic screen — and a generally positive one, at that.

Nonetheless, investment adviser and economic commentator Todd G. Buchholz suggests in his new book that free-marketers shouldn’t be too smug.

The title is misleading: Buchholz doesn’t really seem to believe that outsourcing is a “crisis” — not yet, anyway. But as a former White House director of economic policy under George H.W. Bush, he clearly understands the danger of pretending that all is well when most people are convinced it isn’t.

If a majority of Americans persist in believing outsourcing is a problem, then Buchholz would like to give them a healthier outlet for their worries.

“Of course, outsourcing reflects an efficient way of doing business — given the situation confronting firms,” Buchholz writes. “Of course we should expect CEOs to strive for efficiency and cut costs, which ultimately gives American consumers more buying power. But those businessmen are often acting as they do and often finding outsourcing more efficient than hiring Americans precisely because our tax, litigation, immigration, regulation and education regimes push them out the door.”

While it’s ridiculous to blame “Benedict Arnold CEOs” for moving jobs offshore, Buchholz says, it’s also “naive for conservatives to blithely bless outsourcing without asking whether it may be a symptom of policy stupidity.”

Take U.S. immigration policy, which (thanks to a 1965 law spearheaded by Bobby Kennedy and other congressional liberals) exalts “family unification” over skills and education. The result, says Buchholz: “If Albert Einstein showed up at the border today, most bureaucrats would care less about his brain than about photos of his grandkids and brother-in-law to prove his family ties.”

In fact, many companies have found it necessary to outsource jobs precisely because they can’t import the kind of skilled workers they need to work in the United States. That points to another problem: the shortcomings of our own workforce.

Buchholz says America’s ability to create and retain decent, well-paying jobs is undercut by mediocre schools, “incredibly high” litigation costs, anti-competitive regulations at both the state and federal level, and the prospect of ever-rising payroll taxes to support Social Security and Medicare.

In effect, he argues, too many of our home-grown workers carry the same sign on their backs: “I’m very expensive and really don’t know much.”

The solutions will be as familiar as they are well-argued by Buchholz in this compact, highly readable volume: a serious dose of real competition for union-dominated public schools; tort reform to curb the growth-stifling power of trial lawyers; relaxation of excessive professional licensing and certification requirements at the state level; tax reduction to level the playing field with overseas competitors, and individual retirement and health care savings accounts to give workers a greater sense of responsibility for their own futures.

In short, if we want our country to create more well-paying jobs in what is fast becoming a more open and competitive global economy, we will need to create a more open and competitive economy here at home. Buchholz uses the red herring of “outsourcing” to highlight the domestic issues that really belong at the center of every American political campaign.


About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Kathy Hochul will have to prove she can hold the line on state spending

Hochul’s specific priorities were lowest-common-denominator stuff: “combating” the spread of COVID-19 linked to the Delta variant, pushing billions in stalled federal rent relief out the door to tenants (and ultimately their landlords) and “beginning to change the culture in Albany.” Read More

New York’s SALT Substitute

Gov. Andrew Cuomo began 2018 the way he ended 2017: demonizing Washington Republicans and fulminating against the newly enacted federal tax reform, especially its $10,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Two weeks after his State of the State message, Cuomo devoted a portion of his fiscal 2019 budget presentation to the same subject, pledging again to come up with a plan to restructure the code by shifting from an employee-paid to an employer-paid income-tax system. Read More

Cuomo policies discourage employers

The recent announcement that Dick’s Sporting Goods will build a 650,000-square-foot distribution center in Binghamton has been cited by Gov. Andrew Cuomo as further evidence of an economic resurgence in the region. “Five years ago, we had a 7.9 percent unemployment rate in the Southern Tier,” Cuomo said. “Today, 4.6 percent. The arrows are headed in the right direction.” In fact, as shown in the state Labor Department’s household survey data, the unemployment rate dropped only because fewer residents of the region are available and looking for work. If the labor force were still at its 2010 level, the unemployment rate would be 13 percent. Read More

The Cuomo Way

From Albany to Buffalo, the New York governor’s clubby approach to economic development invites—and deserves—scrutiny. Read More

Fending Off Cuomo’s $15 Fetish

New York has seldom seen an executive initiative as politically radical or economically reckless as Gov. Cuomo’s proposal for a $15-per-hour statewide minimum wage. Read More

New York’s Two-State Solution?

Bill de Blasio was at a ballgame in Queens last Sunday afternoon when a group of rural landowners, town officials, Second Amendment advocates and Tea Party activists rallied in the Southern Tier village of Bainbridge on behalf of a radical reform that would dramatically enhance the mayor’s power in his own backyard: a breakup of New York state. Read More

Cuomo’s Sluggish “Start-up”

Few economic development initiatives in New York State’s history have been the subject of more marketing hype than START-UP NY, which created scores of tax-free micro-zones on and near college campuses around the state. Governor Andrew Cuomo has spared no superlatives in describing his expectations for the program, backing it with a slick, $47 million advertising campaign that touted START-UP as proof that “in New York State, we’re changing the way we do business.” But the results so far haven’t come close to living up to the governor’s rhetoric. Read More

A robust upstate economy? Claims do not hold up

The Southern Tier has been among the most poorly performing regions of a weak upstate New York economy over the past four years. But you sure wouldn’t know it from listening to Howard Zemsky, the Buffalo developer recently named by Gov. Andrew Cuomo to chair the Empire State Development Corp. Read More