Huzzahs echoed from Baghdad to Washington when the Iraqi parliament passed a 2008 budget in a packet of measures several weeks ago.

Mind you, plenty of crucial issues were left to a future day and maybe, for all anyone can tell, to a future decade: matters like how to divide the country’s oil wealth among rivalrous groups. But, hey, the lawmakers managed, after dragging their feet, to piece together a $50 billion budget. So hurray.

Sounds a lot like Albany.

In the spirit of their Iraqi brethren, New York State lawmakers couldn’t bring themselves to vote on a crucial issue. They killed a congestion pricing plan for New York City by stealth, with no one forced to stand up and be counted in front of the voters. But, hey, they managed this week, after dragging their feet, to piece together a $122 billion budget. So hurray.

Only not everyone is cheering. Some people have trouble understanding why, when times are hard, Albany’s notion of tightening its belt is to expand its ample waist.

The state budget shares an important trait with hospital fees and college tuitions. All are somehow freed of economic constraints that apply to the rest of us.

This new budget increases spending by nearly 5 percent, well above the rate of inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index. How many of you have seen your family’s income beat inflation to a pulp?

Through good times and bad, this has been Albany’s fiscal habit for what seems like forever.

Twenty-five years ago, it approved a budget of $31.5 billion. By applying the rate of inflation to that $31.5 billion, you would wind up this year with a budget a shade under $67 billion. Instead, the new budget is nearly twice that amount. Ten years ago, Albany spent roughly $3,900 for each New York State resident. That’s equivalent to about $5,065 in 2008 dollars. Instead, spending now averages about $6,400 per person.

Granted, not everyone buys this analysis.

“The C.P.I. measures a basket of goods and services that a family needs to buy,” said Trudi Renwick, a senior economist at the Fiscal Policy Institute, a liberal research group in Albany. The state’s needs are quite different, she said. They include health care payments, pensions and, in recent years, a batch of new responsibilities like a revised school financing formula.

“To maintain the same level of services, the state government has needed to spend more than the increase in the C.P.I.,” Ms. Renwick said. For her, a better measurement is Albany’s spending as a percentage of total personal income in the state. By that standard, the budget is “not really growing out of control,” she said. In fact, “by that measure, it’s below where it was in 1990.”

“Government spending supports all economic activity in the state,” Ms. Renwick said, “and as the economic activity increases, the need for government services also increases.”

You probably won’t be shocked to hear that not everyone agrees with her, certainly not E. J. McMahon, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative research group. Far from being irrelevant, he said, the price index is “the closest measure we have for the overall cost of living” and for “what a dollar means to the taxpayer.”

Besides, Mr. McMahon said, where is it written that “the overall cost of government should be growing as fast or even faster than the economy that’s supporting it”? To assert that “government must always be some fixed share of total wealth,” he said, “takes a lot of pressure off government to run more efficiently.”

No one, Ms. Renwick included, is about to describe Albany as the most tightly run ship. Here we are in a reeling economy. So how did lawmakers economize? They added 2,000 bodies to the state payroll. Naturally, they also made sure to set aside $700 million to be showered later on the politically blessed in their districts.

They — and their counterparts in the City Council and Congress — suffer from a special form of amnesia, one peculiar to lawmakers. They believe that the cash they play with is theirs. They hand out their goodies, describing them with antiseptic terms like “earmarks” or “member items,” and forgetting that this money is yours.

But let’s look on the bright side. The new governor, David A. Paterson, vows to shake things up. Belts will truly be tightened and waists not expanded, he said the other day. And when will this new age dawn? Next year, the governor said.


Well, you never know. Maybe Iraq will have figured out what to do with its oil money by then.

Read article here

You may also like

State’s Growing Budget Hole Threatens NYC Jobs and Aid as Congress Takes a Holiday

“The biggest problem for the state is the enormous, recurring structural budget gap starting next year and into the future,” said E.J. McMahon of the conservative-leaning Empire Center. “Cuomo clearly hopes that starting in 2021, (Democratic presidential candidate Joseph) Biden and a Democratic Congress will provide states and local government a couple of year’s worth of added stimulus. Read More

How Andrew Cuomo became ‘maybe the most powerful governor’ in U.S.

Ed McKinley ALBANY — When the New York Constitution was reorganized nearly 100 years ago to give the governor more power over the budget process,  noted there was a risk of making “the governor a czar." M Read More

Study disputes Cuomo on Trump tax package; experts say it’s complicated

Michael Gormley ALBANY — A new study by a conservative think tank says President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax law gave most New Yorkers a tax cut, even as Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo insists on repealing the measure because he says it will cost New Yo Read More

Empire Center sues Department of Health over nursing home records

Johan Sheridan ALBANY, N.Y. () — The Empire Center filed a  against the state Department of Health on Friday. “This case isn’t about assigning blame or embarrassing political leaders,” said Bill Hammond, the Empire Center’s Read More

Good news: That New York pork isn’t going out the door after all

The Empire Center first reported Tuesday that grants — 226 of them, totaling $46 million, to recipients selected by the governor and individual state lawmakers — seemed to still be going ahead. Read More

New York Lawmakers Seek Independent Probe of Nursing-Home Coronavirus Deaths

With lingering questions about how the novel coronavirus killed thousands of New Yorkers who lived in nursing homes, a group of state lawmakers is pushing to create an independent commission to get answers from the state Department of Health. Read More

Policy analyst: Cuomo wrong to write-off nursing home criticism as political conspiracy

“The importance of discussing this and getting the true facts out is to understand what did and didn’t happen so we can learn from it in case this happens again,” Hammond said. Read More

EDITORIAL: Nursing home report requires a second opinion

No doubt, the Health Department and the governor would like this report to be the final word on the subject. But if it’s all the same with them, we’d still like a truly independent review. Read More


Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.


Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130


The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.