obama-new-york-tax-231x300-8611311President Obama’s proposed cap on itemized federal income tax deductions for state and local taxes would cost New York residents $3.8 billion a year, according to a report released by Governor Cuomo’s office today. However, you’ll have to dig a little to find that number: Obama isn’t mentioned until page 11 of the 26-page document.

The opening section of the report (which is, by the way, useful and well-researched in most respects) focuses on how bad it would be for New Yorkers if the federal government were to completely eliminate the deduction for state and local taxes. However, no one in a position of authority in Washington is actually proposing such a thing. The much more more serious risk to New York is that the White House and Congress will agree to some form of limit on itemized deductions for high-income taxpayers, as Obama proposed in his budget last week (reviving a proposal he first trotted out three years ago).

For all the talk of polarization in D.C. these days, Obama and the GOP don’t actually differ much on this point. Both are willing to tightly curtail if not eliminate tax breaks at the top end, of which the state and local tax deduction is among the largest. What keeps them apart is a Republican desire to accompany any broadening of the tax base with a reduction in rates.  But if a “grand bargain” ever materializes between Obama and Speaker John Boehner, it’s not difficult to picture congressional Republicans (dominated by representatives from low-wealth, low-tax states) agreeing to a deal that targets the state and local tax deduction for the wealthiest households

Any variation of an exemption cap targeted at the top brackets would have the greatest impact on states combining large numbers of high-income payers with steeply progressive state and local income taxes — particularly New York and California. New York’s tax base alone, including commuters from neighboring states, would generate 30 percent of any added federal revenues generated by such a move, federal tax data indicate.  If the federal tax code is changed in a way that makes New York even less competitive, it will affect the willingness of people to earn income here, not just to live here. This equates to a bigger overall hit on Albany’s fiscal foundation–the highest-earning 1 percent, who this year will generate about 43 percent of the total state income tax.

Although conservatives have been gunning for the state and local deduction since the Reagan era, when its elimination was fended off by a previous Governor Cuomo, a strong case can be made for retaining the deduction on both historical and federalist grounds, and Cuomo’s report today makes that case fairly effectively. Unfortunately, it’s difficult to sympathize with a governor who issues a press release warning of a potential “double tax” just weeks after extending a supposedly temporary state  tax hike on the same people who would pay the most in added federal taxes if something like the President’s proposal is ever adopted.

You may also like

Even With Federal Cuts, New York’s Health Funding Would Remain High

New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding under the major budget bill being debated in Washington – a rare and jarring turn of events for a sector accustomed to steadily increas Read More

Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget

The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan: Top lines Read More

Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy

  New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More

After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality

This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck. When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More

New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected

The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More

Hochul Hides the Specifics of a Looming Tax on Health Insurance

The Hochul administration has requested federal approval for a multibillion-dollar "MCO tax" on health plans without announcing the move or providing details to the public. As by l Read More

New Yorkers’ Health Costs Spiral as Officials Take Credit for ‘Savings’

The latest round of health insurance premium hikes announced by New York regulators adds to evidence that state policies are drowning consumers instead of helping them. Late last mo Read More

Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending

The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget. Read More