The proposed Tier 6 pension for a general employee of state and local government who retires at age 65 after 30 years of service would be 50 percent of final average salary. The Tier 5 pension at the same age and for the same career duration is 60 percent of final average salary. In other words, measured on this basis, the Tier 6 benefit will be 17 percent less than the Tier 5 benefit.
Lately we’ve recently begun hearing unions and their allies kick around a claim that the difference between the two tiers actually comes to 40 percent. This number seems to have originated with the Civil Service Employees Association, as in this quote from CSEA spokesman Steve Madarasz: “The Tier 6 plan represents a 40 percent reduction in benefits, with or without options.”
Of course, the final average salary base is going to be somewhat lower under Tier 6, as well. But it’s hard to figure how that could add another 23 percentage points to the difference–for anyone other than a cop or firefighter, that is.
Can anyone suggest where that 40 percent estimate comes from? We’ll post your answers here. Facts only, please–kindly skip the rhetoric.
(Steve Madarasz: call your office!)
You may also like
Parsing the Impact of Mamdani’s Tax Hike Plans
Why New York’s Health Premiums Keep Going Up
Two Dozen School Districts Are Returning to the Polls for Budget Revotes
Even With Federal Cuts, New York’s Health Funding Would Remain High
Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget
Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy
After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality
New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected
Parsing the Impact of Mamdani’s Tax Hike Plans
- October 30, 2025
Why New York’s Health Premiums Keep Going Up
- October 1, 2025
