Gov. Spitzer won’t present his first Executive Budget for another four weeks, but the essence of New York’s financial situation could be distilled from three sentences in his first State of the State Address yesterday:

“Despite a momentary cash infusion, we are operating in a deficit environment, with out-year deficits conservatively estimated in the tens of billions of dollars.”

“Recurring expenses this year and in the fiscal years ahead are much greater than recurring revenues.”

“Either we raise taxes and place an even greater burden on New Yorkers, or we end the culture of spending that is out of control.”

This was the kind of fiscal straight talk legislators needed to hear – and not a moment too soon.

Moreover, Spitzer said his budget “won’t raise taxes” and “will significantly reduce our rate of spending growth, which has increased at three times the rate of inflation over the last four years.”

But at other points in the same speech – and to generally louder applause from his audience – Spitzer called for significantly higher state spending in several areas, including:

“A new, transparent school-funding formula that dramatically increases investment over the next four years throughout the state, targeting the investment where we need it most.”

An immediate guarantee of health-care access for 500,000 children and expedited Medicaid enrollment of 900,000 uninsured adults.

Infrastructure projects, such as the Second Avenue subway and East Side Access from Long Island to Grand Central Station; a new Peace Bridge connecting Buffalo to Canada; a new Tappan Zee bridge; completion of Interstate 86 in the Southern Tier; and expansion of Stewart Airport.

To pull it all off, Spitzer pledged to “make hard choices and begin to fundamentally reform and restructure programs that have become needlessly expensive” and to “finally learn to say ‘no’ to budget requests we simply cannot afford.”

Details to follow in the budget, due Feb 1. Then we’ll find out if there’s less than meets the eye in Spitzer’s spending promises. For example, under existing law, school spending automatically grows by billions of dollars over the next four years. Perhaps he doesn’t mean to significantly boost school aid far above that baseline.

Similarly, before Spitzer even took office, the growth in Medicaid spending had fallen from over 7 percent to just 2.8 percent, creating slightly more breathing room. And most of the infrastructure projects he cited are already underway, if not fully funded.

In any case, reducing the rate of spending growth won’t be difficult – not after this year’s double-digit hike.

But the budget isn’t the only problem, as Spitzer recognized. He proposed attacking local costs through the consolidation of 4,200 governmental units across the state. This is a political tall order that could better be achieved by leaving local governments in place, but doing more to goad them into consolidating services, which relatively few have done effectively.

Spitzer repeated his campaign call for “reform” – but not repeal – of the wasteful Wicks Law, which drives up public-works costs by requiring multiple subcontractors on construction projects. But he failed to make a frontal assault on other state-mandated costs, especially ones relating to public employees.

Tax-funded pension contributions in New York have soared by nearly $6 billion a year since 2000. Looming just over the horizon is a $150 billion to $200 billion unfunded liability for health benefits for retired state and local government workers. Yet, for the past two years, the Legislature has been rubber-stamping union-backed bills to further sweeten pension benefits and weaken government employers at the bargaining table. Then-Gov. George Pataki vetoed the worst such measures, but similar bills will no doubt soon resurface.

For all his outspoken criticism of Albany’s “army of the status quo,” Spitzer carefully avoided identifying unions as part of New York’s problem. But if he is serious about change, he needs to start sending explicit signals to the Legislature that its pandering to public employees has got to stop. And he needs to promote the kind of pension and benefit changes that Mayor Bloomberg has been pushing for several years.

The ethical and political reforms Spitzer advocated yesterday – especially the end of partisan gerrymandering – would be genuine breakthroughs for New York. But several of his other major proposals – the expansion of STAR property-tax breaks, workers’ compensation reform, added municipal incentive aid, the siting of new power-generation plants – merely build on or replicate Pataki initiatives.

All of which points to the biggest change that occurred in Albany on “Day One”: This governor is expected to deliver.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Washington shouldn’t fund NY’s “normal” budgets

With the coronavirus lockdown continuing to erode tax revenues, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has turned up the volume on his demands for a federal bailout of the New York state budget. In a weekend briefing, the governor repeated his estimate that the Empire State will need help closing a deficit of $10 billion to $15 billion. “I don’t have any funding to do what I normally do,” he said. Read More

How Cuomo is cooking New York’s books

When lawmakers in Albany passed the state budget last spring, Gov. Andrew Cuomo declared it “both timely and fiscally responsible.” Timely was true enough. But fiscally responsible? Not so much. Read More

New York is looking at an ocean of red ink

New York’s new budget — the actual state-government expenditure plan, that is, as opposed to numerous side issues packaged with it — apparently came in close to Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s bottom line. Read More

NY’s ‘prevailing’ protection racket

Few public policies carry a more misleading moniker than New York’s “prevailing wage” law for public works projects — a job-destroying cost-escalator that Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and the State Legislature may be on the verge of expanding as part of their impending state budget deal. Read More

$$$ On His Mind

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has spent most of the past two weeks pointing fingers: first at President Trump, whose tax law he blames for a sudden decline in New York’s revenues, and then at state Senate Democrats, whom he holds responsible for the Amazon fiasco. But the blame game will carry Cuomo only so far. In New York state’s executive budget system, the bucks stop with the governor. And, politically, this year’s budget process will be his most challenging yet, testing both his ability to manage legislative relations and his commitment to financial restraint. Read More

Watch your wallet until the Legislature goes home

As a 19th-century Manhattan politician once observed, “no man’s life, liberty or property are safe while the Legislature is in session.” Some things never change. On balance, New Yorkers would probably be better off if this year’s legislative session ended ahead of its scheduled June 21 adjournment. Read More

Gov. Cuomo’s selective fight against the new federal tax law

Even before Donald Trump became President, congressional Republican tax reformers had been aiming to get rid of or at least tightly curtail the state and local tax deduction, known as SALT, that mainly benefits residents of New York and other high-tax blue states. Read More

New York’s SALT Substitute

Gov. Andrew Cuomo began 2018 the way he ended 2017: demonizing Washington Republicans and fulminating against the newly enacted federal tax reform, especially its $10,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Two weeks after his State of the State message, Cuomo devoted a portion of his fiscal 2019 budget presentation to the same subject, pledging again to come up with a plan to restructure the code by shifting from an employee-paid to an employer-paid income-tax system. Read More