For taxpayers in New York State’s top personal income tax bracket, the new federal tax law will drive the combined federal and state marginal tax rate to within a percentage point of 50 percent, its highest level in 27 years. For New York City’s highest earning residents, the combined federal-state-local income tax bite will now consume more than half of every added dollar of income for couples earning at least $1,000,000.

The following table presents a breakdown of the combined Marginal Effective Tax Rate (METR) for residents of different parts of New York, using a methodology presented in this recent paperby Gerald Prante and Austin John of Lynchburg College. The higher METRs for residents of New York City and in New York City suburbs (where most high-income payers live and work) reflects the impact of the MTA payroll tax in that region.

screen-shot-2013-01-03-at-14135-pm-3910364

Only California, which recently raised its top tax rate to 13.3 percent on incomes over $1 million, will have a higher combined tax bite than New York City under the new law.  For California residents in that state’s top bracket, the income tax on added dollar of income in the top bracket will come to 51.9 percent, according to Prante and John.

The main elements of the federal tax hike are as follows:

  • The top marginal rate rises from 35 percent to 39.6 percent on taxables incomes of $400,000 for single filers and $450,000 for married couples, which typically equates to a range of more than $450,000 to over $500,000 of adjusted gross income after deductions.
  • An additional Medicare tax of 0.9 percent is imposed on all wage and salary income of households in the new top bracket. This is on top of the existing Medicare payroll tax of 2.9 percent — evenly divided between employer shares and employee shares, with self-employed persons paying the full amount. (Most economists assume the “incidence” of a tax paid by an employer falls on the employee.)
  • A federal limitation on the value of total itemized deductions, known as “Pease” after the congressman who introduced it in 1991, is reimposed in high-income brackets after being phased out by the Bush tax cuts between 2006 and 2010. The formula is a bit complicated, but it effectively adds 1.2 percent to the marginal rate in the top bracket.

The combined federal-state-local marginal income tax rate for New Yorkers in the top bracket last exceeded 50 percent back in 1986, when it was about 54 percent statewide, and somewhat higher in the city.  However, that rate applied to a narrower taxable income base, which contained more loopholes before the 1986 federal tax reform law took effect the following year. The city’s combined marginal rate was last above 50 percent in 1995, before a series of state and city income tax cuts took full effect in the late 1990s.

Wealthy New Yorkers who don’t like the idea of paying more than half their total salary, wage and self-employed business income in federal, state and local taxes have three options for bringing their tax bite back under 50 percent. They can choose to rely more on income from capital gains and dividends, which will now be taxed at a federal rate of up to 23.8 percent (up from 15 percent under prior law) but has long been taxed the same as other income at the state and city level. They can also shelter more of their income in tax-free municipal bonds, or in other tax-preferred investments like TV and film production – which will reduce the amount of income available for taxation by the state and city.

A third choice is to move someplace where state and local taxes are lower, or even non-existent.  Of course, nobody is really likely do that.

You may also like

Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget

The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan: Top lines Read More

Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy

  New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More

After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality

This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck. When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More

New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected

The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More

Hochul Hides the Specifics of a Looming Tax on Health Insurance

The Hochul administration has requested federal approval for a multibillion-dollar "MCO tax" on health plans without announcing the move or providing details to the public. As by l Read More

New Yorkers’ Health Costs Spiral as Officials Take Credit for ‘Savings’

The latest round of health insurance premium hikes announced by New York regulators adds to evidence that state policies are drowning consumers instead of helping them. Late last mo Read More

Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending

The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget. Read More

Albany Lawmakers Push a $4 Billion Tax on Health Insurance

Legislative leaders are proposing an additional $4 billion tax on health insurance plans in the upcoming state budget – but withholding specifics of how it would work. Read More