New York’s Medicaid program is now testing, on a small and limited scale, giving people financial incentives and requiring compliance in changing their behavior. The approach has promise — if done right; it’s important to keep in mind the lessons of welfare reform.
When an individual insists on eating too much of the wrong food while not exercising at all, or smoking or never getting a physical checkup, he’s at serious risk of developing a chronic illness.
His choice, his problem? Yes, but when that same person is enrolled in a taxpayer-funded health-insurance program like Medicaid, he also risks becoming a very expensive problem for the rest of us.
Government can’t force people to live more healthful lives. And many people instinctively bridle at the notion of trying to change behavior by constraining consumer choices, even when motivated by the best intentions; that’s why Mayor Bloomberg’s proposed citywide ban on large sugared soft drinks has been so controversial.
But incentives in Medicaid are another matter. Fiscal conservatives who attack such initiatives as a misuse of public funds should keep in mind that many states, private insurers and employers have been trying versions of the same approach for decades.
The idea is simple: A small amount of money spent now to reward people for getting regular checkups and adhering to specific treatment plans can yield much bigger savings down the road. This is good for health outcomes and good for taxpayers
And we certainly need to do something about New York’s $54 billion-a-year taxpayer-funded Medicaid program; it’s seriously broken.
Acute-care costs constitute 52 percent of all Medicaid spending in New York; a large portion of that bill stems from countless patients with preventable and treatable chronic conditions that were not effectively managed earlier.
Gov. Cuomo has launched a multiyear Medicaid-overhaul effort. His administration wants to centrally coordinate and intensively manage care in Medicaid for all patients. But there’s a missing element: the role of patients themselves to be responsible.
The persistence of unhealthy behaviors among chronically ill individuals is a daunting problem — seemingly every bit as intractable as the dependency issues confronting welfare prior to major reforms in 1996.
Welfare reform led to a major transformation. The 1996 law, using the findings from state and local experiments, turned welfare from a program with few expectations of recipients into a system of incentives and responsibilities designed to encourage work.
The reform let states experiment with a mix of incentives and client responsibilities — including earned income tax credits, job placement, case management and various support services such as child care and transportation in return for work. The results met with near-universal acclaim.
Cuomo and other Medicaid reformers can learn from the welfare overhaul — by recognizing that incentives and personal responsibility matter and can play a major role in changing behavior, leveraging better health outcomes and reducing costs.
New York is poised to take a first step by receiving a small federal grant to provide cash rewards to Medicaid patients who enroll in programs for smoking cessation, diabetes prevention and management, weight control and hypertension management. But it’s not bold enough. The Empire State should become a leader in testing new approaches that are positive for Medicaid patients and for the taxpayers who pay for the program.
My new report for the Empire Center for Public Policy suggests:
* Broadening incentives tied clearly to requirements that Medicaid patients adopt healthy behaviors and follow recommended treatment plans.
* Allowing private managed-care plans to provide higher cash rewards — above the current $75-a-year cap — for Medicaid clients practicing healthier behaviors.
* Requiring patients to sign healthy-behavior agreements, enroll in wellness programs and comply with treatment plans — or face consequences (as in welfare reform).
The costs of chronic care are just too high not to act. Redesigning the publicly financed Medicaid system is only half the equation — changing patient behaviors is equally essential.
Read article at NYPost
About the Author
You may also like
Don’t Copy New York’s Medicaid Home Care Disaster
As America ages, states are investing in home-based care for the elderly and disabled in hopes of keeping people out of nursing facilities—and maybe saving money in the bargain. Before going Read More
NY must prune its bloated Medicaid program — and focus on improving low-quality care
The coronavirus pandemic exposed a fundamental imbalance in New York’s approach to health policy: Albany spends too much money on its bloated Medicaid plan but neglects the public-health programs that used to be the Health Department’s main focus — Read More
A Corona Commission for New York
New York is finally ahead of the coronavirus, but its outbreak stands as a world-wide horror story. A sophisticated city was caught unprepared and suffered some of the worst levels of infection and death. The need for an investigation is clear. The harder question is who can credibly take the lead. Read More
New York, beware Warren’s Rx
Elizabeth Warren is an unabashed believer in wealth redistribution, so it was predictable that her Medicare for All plan would hit high-income individuals and large corporations with trillions in tax hikes. More surprising are the two other targets she chooses to soak: states that spend most heavily on Medicaid, and employers that offer the costliest health benefits. Read More
Blame Cuomo for New York’s Medicaid crisis
When it comes to New York’s latest Medicaid mess, the buck stops with Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Read More
What is ailing New York’s hospitals? They’re taking in lots of money but operating in the red
These should be boom times for New York’s hospitals, whose collective revenues have been surging by the billions for several years. Read More
Banishing Profit Is Bad for Your Health
Eliminating profit from an entire sector of the national economy would be unprecedented. But the example of New York, on a smaller scale, shows why it is a recipe for dysfunction. Read More
Single-payer health care could cost some hospitals
The debate about a proposed single-payer health plan for New York State has mostly focused on its potential cost. But far less attention has been paid to the radical impact it may have on hospitals and physicians across the state. Read More