Don’t look now, but the Legislature is a step away from passing a straight four-year extension of the Taylor Law’s police and binding arbitration provision, which is due to sunset June 30. The Senate extender bill (sponsored by Martin Golden, R-Brooklyn) was reported out of the Civil Service and Pensions Committee last week and advanced to third reading on the floor calendar this week. The Assembly bill (sponsored by Peter Abbate, D-Brooklyn) has been sitting on the floor calendar in the lower house since late April.

Governor Cuomo has said he would not agree to extend the law without changes, but hasn’t been clear on what kind of changes he will demand as his price for signing.  Despite strong union support for the measure, Cuomo could make a veto stick—as David Paterson did when hevetoed a previously routine extension of the long-established Tier 2 police and fire pension pension plan back in 2009.

Arbitration has played a major role in driving up and locking in excessive compensation costs for police officers and firefighters across the state. County and municipal officials say the law needs to be changed to them the negotiating leverage they need to push unions harder for changes to unaffordable contract provisions. Nonetheless, Republicans and Democrats in both houses the Legislature have lined up with unions in support of the status quo.

Back in January, Governor Cuomo proposed a budget bill provision that would have capped arbitration awards (including both base pay and health insurance costs) at 2 percent a year, which would have at least given unions a more incentive to negotiate concessions.  Senate Republicans and Assembly Democrats (predictably) wouldn’t bite, instead inserting straight four-year extenders into their respective one-house budget resolutions.  Cuomo wouldn’t agree to that, so the issue was dropped from the final enacted budget.

Last month, Cuomo proposed creation of a “financial restructuring board” for distressed local governments to provide, among other things, an alternative, “voluntary” binding arbitration process for municipalities and their police and fire unions. It’s a puzzlingly half-baked idea, since neither party in a labor dispute would have any reasons to do it, and the rules of the alternative  process were not stipulated. The governor also has said he wouldn’t agree to extend the existing law, but has not otherwise specified what kind of changes would demand as a condition for signing the bill. For now, the legislation creating the restructuring board has served to muddy the waters surrounding the whole issue.

You may also like

Two Dozen School Districts Are Returning to the Polls for Budget Revotes

Voters in 24 New York school districts return to the polls on Tuesday for school budget revotes. Last month, voters in 96 percent of school districts outside New York City conducting votes approved their school budgets for the upcoming year. The 683 sc Read More

Even With Federal Cuts, New York’s Health Funding Would Remain High

New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding under the major budget bill being debated in Washington – a rare and jarring turn of events for a sector accustomed to steadily increas Read More

Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget

The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan: Top lines Read More

Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy

  New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More

After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality

This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck. When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More

New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected

The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More

Hochul Hides the Specifics of a Looming Tax on Health Insurance

The Hochul administration has requested federal approval for a multibillion-dollar "MCO tax" on health plans without announcing the move or providing details to the public. As by l Read More

New Yorkers’ Health Costs Spiral as Officials Take Credit for ‘Savings’

The latest round of health insurance premium hikes announced by New York regulators adds to evidence that state policies are drowning consumers instead of helping them. Late last mo Read More