We know you have had them clog up your mailbox at one time or another, perhaps even sometime in the last week.

Our elected representatives like to keep us up to date on what they’ve been doing in Albany, so they mail large postcards and newsletters with information about what they are doing on our behalf.

One of our editorial board members got one this week.

Assemblyman Dan Stec’s flyer arrived on Sept. 11 with a full color photograph of a soldier holding a little blond-headed girl in his arms. In the photo, both were surrounded by American flags. Underneath were the words, “Serving those who have served us.”

It’s a nice sentiment.

On the flip side of the mailer is a picture of Stec on the floor of the Assembly under the words, “Thank you for your service.” Next to that photo there is text that reminds us that Stec is a veteran and lists five legislative items he has endorsed in the Assembly to benefit veterans.

Yes, it is an election year.

We suspect most of you didn’t give this mailer much of your time. We confess we sometimes toss them in the trash without much of a thought.

You might not be so quick to toss it out if you knew how much it was costing you.

Before we go there, we don’t want you to think we are picking on Dan Stec. The former Queensbury supervisor is not doing anything wrong or anything that his colleagues aren’t doing as well.

But according to the Empire Center — an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank based in Albany — the state Senate spends over $3 million in bulk postage, while the state Assembly spends approximately $2.7 million. That is almost double what it was from a year ago.

Granted, in the grand scheme of New York’s $168.3 billion budget, $6 million is change in the couch cushions, but it still bugs us.

Considering the availability of email and websites to communicate information, it seems like a waste of taxpayer money.

Sending out bulk mailings has also been part of the home-field advantage for incumbents in the New York State Legislature. Mailers like the one that landed from Dan Stec this past week serve as campaign advertising paid for by the taxpayers.

That rubs us the wrong way, too.

Again, Stec is not doing anything wrong. They all do it. That’s the $6 million problem.

In 2014, Stec spent $47,496.82 on bulk mail when he was unopposed. Two years later, with competition from just the Green Party, Stec spent $52,068.36.

Running for re-election for the first time in 2016 against a Republican opponent, Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner spent $52,855.82 on bulk mailings.

The state Senate gets even more of an allowance.

Sen. Little spent $152,240.33 in bulk mail in 2014 when she ran against Robin Barkenhagen of the Green Party. When she was unopposed in 2016, she spent $111,499.83.

Not surprisingly, the amount spent in non-election years tends to drop.

There are times there is important information in these mailers, and other times when they are used to promote events, such as the one Sen. Little sent out promoting a local health fair.

But we believe there are better ways for our elected representatives to get out their message that are far less expensive.

We believe it is time to stop snail-mail advertising from our representatives. It is wasteful and an advantage that incumbent politicians should not have.

We are hoping that one of our elected representatives will set an example and give up the practice voluntarily.

Tags:

You may also like

Bill Requires Municipalities To Maintain Their Websites

Skoufis’ legislation references a 2014 Empire Center highlighted the poor quality of municipal websites many of which lacked basic information. The report found that less than 20% of local governments received a passing grade on their website’s availability of information and usability including two municipalities that did not have a website. Some of those websites have improved over the past five years, including Jamestown’s, which received an “F” rating in 2014. The updated city website includes all of the information Skoufis’ legislation would mandate. Read More

Albany’s ‘big ugly’ provides political cover, but has some benefits

“This has been one of the worst developments in the political process here in New York in modern history,” said E.J. McMahon of the fiscally conservative Empire Center for Public Policy think tank and a former aide to Gov. George Pataki. “It really is corrosive of accountability and democracy and, implicitly, the constitution prohibits it.” Read More

Panel at LIA meeting knocks state single-payer health care bill

"Ninety-three hospitals would lose more than 10 percent of revenue," said Bill Hammond, director of health policy at the Empire Center for Public Policy, a fiscally conservative  Albany think tank. Read More

‘Pork’ Bill Hangs Over Other Issues in Albany

E.J. McMahon, research director for the Empire Center for Public Policy, a fiscally conservative think tank, questioned the need for these projects. His organization found recent SAM allocations paid for projects he deemed frivolous such as a skate park and a local highway garage. “It’s this huge mutual back-scratching,” he said. Read More

Capitol pressroom

Former Assemblyman Richard Brodsky and EJ McMahon, Founder and Research Director of the Empire Center, shared their insights into the effects of the legislation and the political implications. Read More

UNFINISHED BUSINESS AS ALBANY SESSION CLOCK TICKS DOWN

Of the $508 million in pork awarded last year, most of it came from the State and Municipal Facilities program, which is widely derided as legislative slush fund, according to an analysis by the fiscally  conservative Empire Center for Public Policy. Read More

Report says move start of state fiscal year, add budget office

Moving the start of the state fiscal year to July 1 and establishing a Legislative Budget Office are among the recommendations of the Empire Center to improve accountability in the budget process. Read More

Lawmakers look to make New York even more litigious

A 2017 study by the Empire Center found liability costs in New York exceed $20 billion a year. If those costs were passed on to every household in the state — which really they are, in a way, because all affected organizations and insurers have to pass their costs on to their clients —- it would work out to be $2,700 annually. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.