A notable environmental bill that failed to win adoption in the New York legislature’s last session was the Build Public Renewables Act (BPRA).

The bill passed the Senate but was not brought up for a vote in the Assembly. Bowing to public pressure, however, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie called for a special hearing this Thursday to get more input on the bill.

And it desperately needs thoughtful input, because it is an over-reaching and ill-considered bill, designed to surreptitiously undermine energy markets. rather than just free up NYPA to build more renewable projects.

If authorizing NYPA to build renewable power generation was all the bill did, there would be little to object to. But the act goes further and requires it to do so. This takes away from NYPA’s authority to make good business decisions on whether it’s better to build power generation or buy it on the competitive market.

And despite the goals of supporters, requiring NYPA to build renewable energy sources won’t speed the transition to renewable energy in New York. Being a public-benefit corporation doesn’t magically enable it to build solar or wind farms any faster than for-profit firms or jump ahead of them in the congested interconnection queue (the waiting line to attach energy production facilities to transmission lines).

And every request for proposals put out by the New York State Energy Research and Development Agency (NYSERDA), has been eagerly met by private independent energy companies. To the extent that New York may not be on target to meet its renewable energy goals, it’s because the goals were arbitrarily set by politicians and because it’s hard to build sufficient transmission capability that quickly.

Additionally, the bill puts a dangerous constraint on NYPA, only allowing it to generate or purchase renewable energy after 2030. There is an escape clause letting it buy non-renewable energy to meet reliability needs, but we’ve already seen that the Department of Environmental Conservation isn’t concerned about reliability when considering the building of generation facilities. This brings into question whether DEC would try to block any NYPA efforts to generate non-renewable energy, even if needed for reliability.

Other lesser-known provisions of the BPRA are overtly ideological and would distract from its primary purpose of providing electricity affordably and reliably.

First, the bill would require a dramatic expansion of NYPA’s Board of Trustees from seven to seventeen members with required representation from a variety of special interests, including NYPA employee and contractor labor unions, environmental justice advocates, community renewable energy advocates, consumer advocates and building electrification and energy efficiency experts. This is a scheme sure to create conflict and potentially undermine what should be the single-minded focus of NYPA, which is to provide electricity reliably and affordably.

Second, the bill requires the creation of a so-called “energy democracy” plan. Energy democracy may sound high-minded, but it’s a buzzword for anti-market activism that seeks politically dominated energy production. In the end, BPRA is likely intended as the first step toward eliminating New York’s effective energy markets and socializing power production and distribution in the Empire State.

New York doesn’t need this bill. It should be limited to authorizing NYPA to build new renewable energy facilities if NYPA finds it beneficial to do so. Beyond that, the legislation can only harm NYPA. If not radically revised, it should be rejected.

Those wishing to submit public comment on BPRA can access the comment form here.

You may also like

Hochul’s Call on Crypto Bill Puts Climate Agenda over Upstate Economy

After remaining for months on the fate of the proposed two-year moratorium on crypto-mining, Governor Kathy Hochul has now the bill into law, as her administr Read More

Municipalized LIPA Won’t Solve Long Islanders’ Power Woes

If the power goes out under a fully municipalized LIPA, you can bet neither the Legislature nor public power advocates will accept the blame. Read More

Can New York Afford the “Clean Water, Clean Air and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act of 2022”?

On November 8, New Yorkers will be voting on Proposal 1, the $4.2 billion “Clean Water, Clean Air, and Green Jobs Environmental Bond.” Read More

A “fab-ulous” deal for New York State? 

Micron says it intends to invest $20 billion by 2030 in a single “Mega-fab” and up to $100 billion in total over the next 20 years Read More

NYISO Predicts Troubled Energy Future

The future is not bright for the Empire State’s electrical power grid, according to the newly released 2021 - 2040 System & Resource Outlook Read More

The Inflation Reduction Act Will Barely Move the Needle on Climate Goals

Supporters of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) are at no loss for words to describe their excitement at its passage. Read More

State Budget Back in the Red

Historically large budgetary surpluses inherited by Governor Hochul are now just a memory with New York facing projected gaps of $13.7 Billion Read More

The Numbers Don’t Add Up on Cider Solar Project

Governor Hochul has just announced approval for the state’s largest to-date solar facility, the 3,000 acre Cider Solar Farm in Genesee County Read More

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!