New York, you have a problem. You’re addicted to health taxes.

The habit hooked the state government 20 years ago this month, when the Health Care Reform Act took effect.

The main purpose of that law was to do a good thing: end state-imposed price controls on hospitals, giving free-market competition a chance to tame spiraling health-care costs. To smooth the transition, state lawmakers sent hospitals extra aid.

And they financed that aid, fatefully, with new taxes on health insurance.

The deregulation part of the law worked — at least modestly. New York’s per-capita hospital spending, which had been the highest in the country, gradually trended closer to the national norm.

But the other parts of the law — the taxes and spending — took on a life of their own.

Over the 12 years from 2000 through 2011, lawmakers either hiked the HCRA taxes or created new ones 14 times — causing annual receipts to almost triple. The addiction had taken hold.

Including the nation’s heaviest state tax on cigarettes, HCRA now brings in $5.5 billion per year, making it the third-largest tax in the nation’s highest-taxed state.

Insidiously, the surcharges on health insurance are collected in ways that hide them from public view. Yet they add as much as 6.2 percent to a typical New York City resident’s insurance costs, compounding the pain of high premiums and deductibles.

One of the surcharges, known as the “covered lives assessment,” varies wildly from one part of the state to another. In 2016, it ranged from $10.24 per year in the Utica-Watertown region to $202.82 in New York City, a difference of 1,880 percent.

Plus, the surcharges make no allowance for ability to pay, hitting families in the working and middle classes just as hard as the wealthy.

Nor is all the money well spent. Over the years, state lawmakers have funneled billions of it into programs that have no direct public-health benefit — like subsidizing doctors’ malpractice premiums, boosting pay and benefits for health-care workers or plugging holes in the state budget.

Today, two-thirds of HCRA monies flow into the state’s Medicaid health plan for the poor and disabled, which now covers one out of three New Yorkers. Those funds pay 17 percent of the state’s cost for the program, effectively freeing up money for lawmakers to use elsewhere.

Especially problematic is HCRA’s $1 billion Indigent Care Pool, which supposedly compensates hospitals for treating the uninsured. While the pool pays some institutions three or four times the value of charity care they provide, most safety-net institutions get pennies on the dollar.

Statistical analysis shows, in fact, that hospitals serving a higher percentage of Medicaid patients tend to be reimbursed for a lower percentage of their charity work — a reverse Robin Hood effect.

For many years, lawmakers earmarked seven-figure pots of HCRA money for legislative leaders to dole out as they wished, with virtually no oversight — a practice that played a key role in the federal corruption conviction of long-time Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver. While the pork-barrel accounts have since been closed, parts of HCRA remain opaque to even the most seasoned observers of the state budget.

In the name of “reform,” in short, New Yorkers struggling to afford health coverage are paying billions in regressive taxes to finance programs that do little to improve health care — and, in some cases, enable dysfunction.

Many of the law’s key provisions are due to expire at the end of 2017, putting the future of HCRA squarely at the heart of this year’s budget negotiations between Gov. Cuomo and the Legislature.

Lawmakers should take the opportunity to weed out wasteful, politically driven boondoggles, redirect indigent-care dollars to support patients rather than institutions and enact a long-term plan to wean the state away from taxes on health care as a major source of revenue.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

How a Blast From the Past Could Save NYC Again

Forty-five years ago this month, then-Gov. Hugh L. Carey and the state Legislature passed a landmark law, the Financial Emergency Act, designed to rescue Gotham from imminent bankruptcy. Read More

The Numbers Debunk Cuomo’s SALT Gripes

For the better part of three years now, Gov. Cuomo has been pounding SALT — the federal income-tax deduction for state and local taxes. Read More

Experts Weigh in on How to Save New York City Post-Coronavirus

"With massive budget deficits looming, Mayor de Blasio’s post-pandemic plan boils down to hoping for a stopgap federal bailout and asking Albany for permission to issue billions in deficit bonds. This won’t solve the problem. New York needed a much leaner, more efficient public sector even before the novel coronavirus blew a hole in its tax base." Read More

The Fear Behind City Union’s Strike Threat

Polling this month showed that two-thirds of the nation’s teachers would prefer to stay out of the classroom this fall, and teachers unions across America are poised to keep schools from reopening. The unions say the safety of their members is their top concern, yet, truth is, their bottom lines are just as critical. That’s because the pandemic represents their biggest financial threat since teachers won the right to stop paying them. Read More

Tax Day 2.0 Marks the End of NY’s Economic Expansion

New York’s slow reopening has begun just in time for a virtual April 15 — Tax Day 2.0, pushed back three months by the novel-coronavirus pandemic. In a way, it’s the end of an era: The tax returns due to be filed on Wednesday will report incomes earned in 2019, the close of a decade-long economic expansion. Read More

Say Yes to Long Island City Development: NYC Must Salvage the Plots Intended for Amazon’s Second HQ

Predicting doom and gloom for New York is all the rage. While we do face difficult fiscal choices for the next several years, those with skin in the game are contradicting this “death of New York” narrative — and offering a way out. Developers across the city are asking communities for nothing more than regulatory permission to add jobs, mixed-income housing and new high-quality public spaces. Yet just this week, Councilmember Jimmy Van Bramer denounced a multi-billion dollar investment in offices and homes in Long Island City — shortly after denouncing 2,700 new mixed-income homes in Astoria. Read More

Instead of Facing Fiscal Crises, NYC, State are Burying Their Heads in the Sand

The headlines surrounding this week’s New York City budget naturally focused on #DefundthePolice demands. But for all its larger potential implications for New Yorkers’ security and quality of life, the partially illusory $1 billion “cut” in the New York Police Department budget was a sideshow in fiscal terms. Read More

A Corona Commission for New York

New York is finally ahead of the coronavirus, but its outbreak stands as a world-wide horror story. A sophisticated city was caught unprepared and suffered some of the worst levels of infection and death. The need for an investigation is clear. The harder question is who can credibly take the lead. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.