new-york-on-track-to-experience-energy-deficits-of-ten-percent-or-more

New York On Track to Experience Energy Deficits of Ten Percent or More

CLCPA Sets New York on Path to Energy Deficit

Albany, NY — The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) places New York communities at risk of devastating blackouts due to insufficient electricity levels, according to Cold & Dark, a new Empire Center study.

The goals proposed by the CLCPA severely hinder New York’s energy supply, causing energy deficits that could be observed as soon as 2040, with supply falling short of demand by ten percent.

Renewable energy sources—like solar and wind power—are prioritized in the CLCPA, while natural gas production is set to be phased out. Renewables, however, are not always reliable, particularly during winter months when demand is highest. Without dispatchable energy sources like natural gas or nuclear power, New Yorkers could be left without reliable heat and power when needed most.

By the Climate Action Council’s own admission, “there are many weeks in the year when contributions from renewables and existing clean firm resources are not sufficient to meet demand.” Under these circumstances, an ill-timed blackout caused by a severe winter storm could lead to hundreds of deaths.

“Before the state gets itself into a position where it risks not having sufficient electricity to meet demand, we need to pause and act cautiously,” said James Hanley, senior policy analyst at the Empire Center and the paper’s author. “New York’s Climate Act may be well-intended, but it is short-sighted, and creates great risks for the people of the Empire State. Energy shortages would drive up the cost of the Climate Act by hundreds of billions of dollars and could cost hundreds of New Yorkers their lives.”

The paper lays out several steps the Climate Action Council can take to protect New York’s energy future—chief among them being a reassessment of the ambitious goals and timeline. The paper also recommends maintaining reliable sources of energy, including natural gas and nuclear power.

Read the full report here.

The Empire Center, based in Albany, is an independent, not-for-profit, non-partisan think tank dedicated to promoting policies that can make New York a better place to live, work and raise a family.

You may also like

NY Energy Policy: Blackout Danger Returns 20 Years Later

On the 20th anniversary of the 2003 New York City blackout, Empire Center fellow James E. Hanley issued the following statement. Read More

State Budget Proposal Doubles Down on Reckless Spending, Empire Center Says

After Governor Hochul’s budget unveiling this afternoon, Empire Center experts offered their reactions to the latest framework. Read More

Empire Center Experts React to the 2023 State of the State 

In response to Governor Hochul’s State of the State address and policy book, Empire Center experts issued the following reactions. Read More

Empire Center Issues State Policy Guide 

The Empire Center for Public Policy has released a policy guide and briefing book focused on the most important issues confronting New York. Read More

Government EV Mandate Could Harm Middle- and Low-Income New Yorkers, New Report Shows

Albany, NY — An Albany mandate requiring 100 percent of new passenger car and truck sales be zero-emissions vehicles (ZEVs) by 2035 could be as improbable as it is harmful for middle- and low-income New Yorkers, a new Empire Center stud Read More

School Districts Must Cover Majority of Bus Electrification Costs

Federal and state assistance would pay for only about 10 percent of the state’s total effort to electrify its entire school bus fleet, according to a new Empire Center research paper. Read More

Testimony: Build Public Renewables Act Undermines an Effective Market

The Build Public Renewables Act (BPRA) threatens to do far more harm than good to New York’s energy landscape Read More

CLCPA Renewable Energy Targets can be met only at Great Cost, Report Shows

New York can increase its use of renewable energy and reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions, but it cannot do so cheaply or safely. Read More