Saddled with yet another high-priced mandate from Albany, Mayor Giuliani and the City Council are rethinking their tax-cutting agenda. But curtailing tax cuts now would represent a step backward from policies that have contributed to the city’s strongest private-sector employment growth in a half century.

The state Legislature has handed retired city workers a permanent cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) that will add nearly $500 million to the city budget by 2004. That effectively spends nearly half of the money that the mayor and the council wanted to devote to tax cuts as part of the 2001 city budget.

Scaling back the tax-cut package–which includes a personal income-tax cut and repeal of the commercial rent tax–is the quickest and easiest way to free the cash needed to digest the COLA. But this prescription could hurt the city more than the disease it seeks to cure.

There’s no question that the city’s sky-high taxes have been job-killers. And fresh evidence of a strong correlation can be found in a new study of urban finances by a team of respected economists, including Andrew Haughwout of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

An econometric model developed by Haughwout and his colleagues suggests that cuts in New York’s top personal-income-tax rate since 1998 resulted in the creation of 55,500 jobs–more than half the city’s net employment growth last year. The same model indicates that the income-tax cuts that the mayor and City Council had planned on could lead to creation of another 21,500 jobs, with millions of additional tax revenue.

These predictions jibe well with the city’s actual experience over the pa st few decades. In every prior economic expansion since 1950–including a couple of roaring bull markets–New York City’s share of national private-sector employment fell. That is, city job growth failed to keep pace with the rest of the country even in years when New York managed to grow in absolute terms.

Over the last four years, however, this barometer has been virtually unchanged; indeed, the city share of the nation’s total private sector jobs actually rose slightly, from 2.8 to 2.81 percent, in 1999. That trend is continuing through the first half of 2000. In June, city private-sector employment reached its highest total since 1971.

The job growth has followed cuts in personal income taxes. Starting with Gov. Pataki’s state rate cuts in 1995 and continuing through the 1998 city tax cut pushed by City Council Speaker Peter Vallone, the combined state-city income-tax rate has been reduced at the margin from 12.3 percent to 10.6 percent. Though still considerably higher than in neighboring jurisdictions, the combined top tax rate in New York is now at its lowest point since the city first imposed its own income tax in 1966.

City tax policy is likely to be even more important as today’s New Economy continues to evolve. As highlighted in the latest issue of the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal, the Silicon Alley entrepreneurs who are now the most powerful engine of employment growth in New York are particularly sensitive to elements of the city’s income tax and to the commercial rent tax.

In a time of plenty, tax cuts should be a no-brainer for New York–as should efficiency and productivity gains to preserve vital services. Of course, this is no small challenge in the birthplace of municipal tax-and-spend liberalism.

The tax cuts are now in jeopardy because of growing shortfalls projected in the city’s budget for 2002 through 2004. But well over half the budget gap is attributable to city spending growth–and not just the new pension obligation. While Giuliani was able to reduce real spending during his first few years in office, more recent city budgets have reflected the philosophy enunciated a few weeks ago by Herb Berman, the council’s finance chairman: “If we end up with more revenue, what are we going to do with it? You have to spend it.”

That attitude has gotten the city into past trouble, leading to the tax hikes that that Haughwout and his colleagues blame for the loss of 492,000 jobs in New York since 1970.

A key decision point on taxes is fast approaching. Once Gov. Pataki signs the bill authorizing the income-tax cut, the council must act by July 31 or the window will close on this tax cut until next year.

The best signal that city officials can send to the workers and investors who are building New York’s new economy is to continue cutting personal income taxes and start phasing in a repeal of the commercial rent tax now, and to get to work more vigorously than ever on reducing spending trends for the future.

E.J. McMahon Jr., a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, is a former deputy state tax commissioner and minority staff director of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee.


About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Kathy Hochul will have to prove she can hold the line on state spending

Hochul’s specific priorities were lowest-common-denominator stuff: “combating” the spread of COVID-19 linked to the Delta variant, pushing billions in stalled federal rent relief out the door to tenants (and ultimately their landlords) and “beginning to change the culture in Albany.” Read More

New York’s SALT Substitute

Gov. Andrew Cuomo began 2018 the way he ended 2017: demonizing Washington Republicans and fulminating against the newly enacted federal tax reform, especially its $10,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Two weeks after his State of the State message, Cuomo devoted a portion of his fiscal 2019 budget presentation to the same subject, pledging again to come up with a plan to restructure the code by shifting from an employee-paid to an employer-paid income-tax system. Read More

Cuomo policies discourage employers

The recent announcement that Dick’s Sporting Goods will build a 650,000-square-foot distribution center in Binghamton has been cited by Gov. Andrew Cuomo as further evidence of an economic resurgence in the region. “Five years ago, we had a 7.9 percent unemployment rate in the Southern Tier,” Cuomo said. “Today, 4.6 percent. The arrows are headed in the right direction.” In fact, as shown in the state Labor Department’s household survey data, the unemployment rate dropped only because fewer residents of the region are available and looking for work. If the labor force were still at its 2010 level, the unemployment rate would be 13 percent. Read More

The Cuomo Way

From Albany to Buffalo, the New York governor’s clubby approach to economic development invites—and deserves—scrutiny. Read More

Fending Off Cuomo’s $15 Fetish

New York has seldom seen an executive initiative as politically radical or economically reckless as Gov. Cuomo’s proposal for a $15-per-hour statewide minimum wage. Read More

$15 Minimum Will Hurt the Poor

If Gov. Cuomo has his way, New York could soon become the first state in the nation to raise its minimum wage to $15 an hour. Read More

New York’s Two-State Solution?

Bill de Blasio was at a ballgame in Queens last Sunday afternoon when a group of rural landowners, town officials, Second Amendment advocates and Tea Party activists rallied in the Southern Tier village of Bainbridge on behalf of a radical reform that would dramatically enhance the mayor’s power in his own backyard: a breakup of New York state. Read More

Cuomo’s Sluggish “Start-up”

Few economic development initiatives in New York State’s history have been the subject of more marketing hype than START-UP NY, which created scores of tax-free micro-zones on and near college campuses around the state. Governor Andrew Cuomo has spared no superlatives in describing his expectations for the program, backing it with a slick, $47 million advertising campaign that touted START-UP as proof that “in New York State, we’re changing the way we do business.” But the results so far haven’t come close to living up to the governor’s rhetoric. Read More