In 2017, lawmakers adopted a new corporate subsidy giveaway that supporters called the “Good Jobs for Michigan” program. It provides tax incentives to lure big, sometimes multinational, corporations into relocating to or expanding in Michigan.

A sunset provision in the law mandates that the program stop awarding new deals at the end of this year. Lawmakers should let the program die. Evidence shows targeted government incentives for business are unnecessary and may even be economically harmful.

One selling point for Good Jobs for Michigan was that it would help lure the Foxconn Technology Group to drop a large manufacturing plant somewhere in Michigan. “We didn’t have a tool for larger company opportunities,” then-Gov. Rick Snyder was quoted as saying at the law’s signing ceremony.

But there is scant proof that subsidizing relocation — especially for big companies — is effective at creating jobs in Michigan, or for that matter, anywhere.

Less than 1% of all net jobs created in Michigan from 1990 through 2015 came from businesses relocating here, according to data from the National Establishment Time-Series database. Moreover, only a microscopic fraction of those businesses received an incentive from the state of Michigan. Even worse for the cause of the Good Jobs program, the state can’t prove that any incentives were required for those firms to relocate. They may have relocated without taxpayer support, which would make these subsidies a complete waste of taxpayers’ money.

Indeed, it’s likely that Michigan would have landed these businesses without corporate handouts. A 2018 report by Timothy Bartik of the Upjohn Institute for Employment Research finds that between 2% and 25% of incentive deals made a difference to companies deciding to relocate, expand or stay put. That means as much as 98% of corporate incentives doled out by the state are to companies that “would have made a similar decision … without the incentive.”

In its report, “The Job Creation Shell Game,” Good Jobs First, a D.C.-based corporate incentive watchdog, calculated how much relocating companies, regardless of whether they got state deals or not, were responsible for job growth in Texas from 2003 through 2009. Authors found that the gain from jobs due to relocations equaled only 0.23% of state jobs that existed in 2003.

The Empire Center of New York and Pioneer Institute of Massachusetts also made similar, NETS-based calculations for their states and likewise found job gains or losses due to relocation were only a tiny part of the state’s job picture. Moreover, their reports showed that most establishment and job relocations came from neighboring states. This makes sense given the cost of moving physical and human capital to a new location, and it should serve a cautionary note about chasing distant corporations.

In a new and important working paper by university scholars, the NETS database was used in conjunction with another database of more than 2,400 incentivized firms from 35 states, 180 of which were from Michigan. The paper tracked the staffing history of those receiving government assistance and members of a control group that had not.

Employment at the firms that did not receive an incentive, the authors found, grew 3.7% faster than at firms that had received one. The authors also said there was a “starkly negative” link between incentives and large firms — the type targeted with Good Jobs for Michigan incentives — and employment growth.

The program was born out of an attempt to lure Foxconn and other large companies to Michigan. Ultimately, the conglomerate was offered a handout worth as much as $3.7 billion. It declined the state’s offer and accepted one from Wisconsin instead. Wisconsin’s “win” has yet to pan out, and Foxconn is missing important jobs milestones.

Evidence shows that corporate relocations have contributed a minuscule number of jobs to our economy and those involving incentives even much less so.

The program should be allowed to expire. All Lansing lawmakers need to do to make that happen is . . . nothing. Is that too much to ask?

Michael LaFaive is senior director of fiscal policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

© 2019 The Detroit News

You may also like

Here’s Cuomo’s Plan for Reopening New York

Jesse McKinley ALBANY, N.Y. — Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on Monday presented a soft blueprint for how New York State’s economy might begi Read More

States with few virus cases get big share of relief aid

Geoff Mulvihill Alaska, Hawaii, Montana and Wyoming are not epicenters of the coronavirus pandemic. Yet these four states scored big this spri Read More

What to expect in the state’s first round of spending cuts

Rebecca Lewis Regular viewers of Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s daily coronavirus press briefings have heard the governor say time and again that New York state is broke. Revenue projections are way down and the state is facing a budget deficit that is Read More

Eyeing Medicaid Cuts, Cuomo Puts His Stamp On A $3 Trillion Stimulus Bill

Caroline Lewis During state budget discussions in March, Governor Andrew Cuomo  that the pandemic would not stop him from pushing through changes to Medicaid that he said were necessary to contain the growth of its more than $70 billion annu Read More

Hospitals, nursing homes face another Medicaid cut during pandemic

Michael Gormley ALBANY — The state told hospitals and nursing homes this week that they will be hit with another cut in Medicaid funding as the health care system reels from costs related to fighting the COVID-19 virus and state revenue plum Read More

Port Authority’s Bloated Payroll Grew $150 Million Last Year: Report

Eve Kessler he Port Authority of New York and New Jersey’s payroll ballooned by $150 million last year — a bad look when the agency is asking the federal government , including the . According to the Empire Center, a conservative-lean Read More

Regional leaders play limited role in Western New York’s reopening

Caitlin Dewey Western New York’s regional “control room” meets by phone for as long as an hour each day, opening with a briefing from Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul before officials trade local updates, case numbers and complaints. The group, Read More

Cuomo criticized for not exempting out-of-state health care workers from income tax

Joe Chen New York policy leaders say that Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s decision to not exempt out-of-state health care workers from the state’s income tax makes the state appear ungrateful for their help. “Cuomo told those he was asking to com Read More


Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.


Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130


The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.