In its look-back today on Governor Andrew Cuomo’s second legislative session, The New York Times quotes the governor as saying he had “front-loaded” the legislative calendar. The article (subscription required) includes this line:

Last December, he [Cuomo] mitigated much of the projected state deficit by restructuring New York’s tax code, lowering taxes for the middle class while creating a new high-tax bracket for the state’s top earners.

As commonly defined, the word “restructuring,” implies a basic change to the organization, makeup or pattern of something — in this case, the state personal income tax.  Today’s Times story links to the same paper’s original account of the tax changes as an “overhaul” — which, in the dictionary definition, means a thorough revision or renewal.  However, both descriptions are misleading. What the governor and the Legislature did to the tax code last December was tinker, not restructure. The change was not thorough; indeed, it was not even permanent.

The December tax bill temporarily reduced the marginal rate on middle-class earners by a small amount (3 to 6 percent), generating an even smaller net percentage tax savings for most affected households, while temporarily extending a tax bracket that increases total income taxes on high-income earners by a larger amount (29 percent).  The tax rates and standard deduction were linked to inflation for the first time, but this was also temporary.  All the changes are due to expire at the end of 2014.  Temporary rate changes aside, the basic structure of the New York State income tax — a unique hybrid of graduated and flat tax, plus deductions, exemptions and credits — was left unchanged.

During the first 11 months in office last year, Cuomo repeatedly had pledged not to extend the temporary tax increase enacted under Governor Paterson in 2009.  But after a drop in projected revenues became apparent in late October, which added $1.5 billion to the projected budget gap for fiscal 2012-13, he changed his position.  Rather than simply concede that he preferred to raise new revenue rather than cut more spending from the budget, the governor promoted a new narrative designed to justify his move as a sweeping “tax reform” or “overhaul” that allegedly would restore “fairness”  to the tax code.  The real story is recounted here and here.

The tax hike was a political win for the governor, taking a big potential complication off the table before the start of this year’s budgeting cycle.  But by continuing to describe the changes using terms like “restructure,” the Times and other media outlets perpetuate the governor’s self-serving and misleading spin.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Albany Lawmakers Push a $4 Billion Tax on Health Insurance

Legislative leaders are proposing an additional $4 billion tax on health insurance plans in the upcoming state budget – but withholding specifics of how it would work. Read More

Hochul’s ‘Straight Talk’ on Medicaid Isn’t Straight Enough

Arguably the biggest Medicaid news in Governor Hochul's budget presentation was about the current fiscal year, not the next one: The state-run health plan is running substantially over budget. Read More

DeRosa Is Still Hiding the Truth About Cuomo’s Pandemic Response

As the long-time top aide to former Governor Andrew Cuomo, Melissa DeRosa ought to have useful information to share about the state's pandemic response – especially about what went wrong and how the state could be better Read More

One Brooklyn Health’s Money Troubles Raise a Billion-Dollar Question

A brewing fiscal crisis at One Brooklyn Health, which has received more than $1 billion in turnaround funding from the state, raises the question of whether that money has been well spent. Read More

As migrants flow to NY, so does red ink 

The influx of foreign migrants to New York could cost the state $4.5 billion more than expected next year, Governor Hochul today warned.  Read More

Beware of Medicaid’s Spending Swings

The state's Medicaid spending is becoming increasingly volatile from month to mo Read More

The Bill Arrives: NY Faces $9B Budget Gap Next Year 

New York’s outyear budget gaps, the shortfall between planned state expenses and state tax receipts over the next three years, has exploded to more than $36 billion, just-released documents show.  Read More