Some people just won’t take “no” for an answer.

Fresh from the voters’ resounding rejection of Prop One – the so-called “budget reform” that really amounted to a prescription for runaway spending – some legislative leaders are already pledging they will revisit elements of the same dubious package.

The change most favored by Albany’s self-styled good-government groups involves the creation of an entirely new arm of government – a so-called Independent Budget Office, or IBO.

The IBO’s proponents claim that, among other things, this new agency could resolve disputes over how much revenue will be available in the coming fiscal year. But it’s not as if we don’t have enough bean-counters in the Capitol already. Consider how the process now unfolds:

The governor’s Division of the Budget produces a revenue estimate, tweaked to err on the low side of a consensus derived from technical methodology detailed in a 170-page report.

The Senate Finance Committee and Assembly Ways and Means Committee generate their own estimates – invariably higher than the governor’s.

The State Comptroller submits his estimate – usually somewhere in between the extremes represented by the governor and Legislature.

The proposed new budget office – supplementing, not replacing, Albany’s existing budgetary bureaucracies – would simply add yet another number to this stew of educated guesses.

To be sure, a new IBO would offer a convenient new pre-retirement haven for legislative staffers in need of a few more pension credits. But that would be a high price to pay for a “consensus” that is actually well within the reach of all the parties.

The easiest solution would be to do what a half-dozen other states do: stipulate that the governor’s estimate is binding on everyone, right from the start.

The Legislature, of course, won’t even consider this option. But there is an alternative: let the comptroller cast a deciding vote and be done with it.

While the IBO would be wasteful and ultimately pointless, the budget process could gain from other forms of staff restructuring. For example, the Senate Finance Committee and the Assembly Ways and Means Committee are now budgeted at a total of nearly $11 million a year, which pays for scores of full-time analysts as well as expensive consulting contracts. Much of the work is duplicative and needlessly partisan.

A worthy alternative would be to eliminate the existing fiscal committee staffs in favor of a nonpartisan, professional Legislative Budget Office serving all members in both houses – and the public, as well. (Similar staff offices exist in California and New Jersey, for example.)

This would be closer to the model of the respected Congressional Budget Office, which supporters of the IBO claim they want to emulate.

By itself, streamlining the Senate and Assembly staff bureaucracy will do nothing to ensure better budgetary results. But at the very least, it will ensure that when lawmakers insist on making expensive and wrongheaded budget choices, they will do so with their eyes wide open.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Washington shouldn’t fund NY’s “normal” budgets

With the coronavirus lockdown continuing to erode tax revenues, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has turned up the volume on his demands for a federal bailout of the New York state budget. In a weekend briefing, the governor repeated his estimate that the Empire State will need help closing a deficit of $10 billion to $15 billion. “I don’t have any funding to do what I normally do,” he said. Read More

How Cuomo is cooking New York’s books

When lawmakers in Albany passed the state budget last spring, Gov. Andrew Cuomo declared it “both timely and fiscally responsible.” Timely was true enough. But fiscally responsible? Not so much. Read More

New York is looking at an ocean of red ink

New York’s new budget — the actual state-government expenditure plan, that is, as opposed to numerous side issues packaged with it — apparently came in close to Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s bottom line. Read More

NY’s ‘prevailing’ protection racket

Few public policies carry a more misleading moniker than New York’s “prevailing wage” law for public works projects — a job-destroying cost-escalator that Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and the State Legislature may be on the verge of expanding as part of their impending state budget deal. Read More

$$$ On His Mind

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has spent most of the past two weeks pointing fingers: first at President Trump, whose tax law he blames for a sudden decline in New York’s revenues, and then at state Senate Democrats, whom he holds responsible for the Amazon fiasco. But the blame game will carry Cuomo only so far. In New York state’s executive budget system, the bucks stop with the governor. And, politically, this year’s budget process will be his most challenging yet, testing both his ability to manage legislative relations and his commitment to financial restraint. Read More

Cuomo’s Buffalo Billion was beyond corrupt

The overarching scandal here wasn’t bid-rigging or the pay-to-play pattern in the developers’ contributions to the governor’s reelection campaign. At the root was a simply awful public policy — corporate welfare on steroids — that neither Cuomo nor most of his critics have definitively renounced, even now. Read More

Watch your wallet until the Legislature goes home

As a 19th-century Manhattan politician once observed, “no man’s life, liberty or property are safe while the Legislature is in session.” Some things never change. On balance, New Yorkers would probably be better off if this year’s legislative session ended ahead of its scheduled June 21 adjournment. Read More

Gov. Cuomo’s selective fight against the new federal tax law

Even before Donald Trump became President, congressional Republican tax reformers had been aiming to get rid of or at least tightly curtail the state and local tax deduction, known as SALT, that mainly benefits residents of New York and other high-tax blue states. Read More