screen-shot-2011-10-06-at-95834-am-9575851New York State’s senior U.S. senator played a leading role in yesterday’s unveiling of Senate Democrats’ latest version of a federal “millionaire tax” — this one limited to people who actually earn $1 million or more a year of taxable income. The proposal is intended to win support form wavering Senate Democrats for President Obama’s “Jobs Act” — which, in its current form, would be financed by reducing tax exemptions and raising rates on incomes starting around $250,000.

In explaining why he favored a 5 percent federal “surtax” kicking in at the $1 million level, Sen. Charles Schumer also provided ammunition for opponents of extending New York State’s temporary income tax hike on high earners, which hits incomes as low as $200,000 for singles and $300,000 for couples.

At yesterday’s Senate Majority press conference in Washington, Schumer said:

In the eyes of many, it is hard to ask more (of) households that make $250 or $300,000 a year. Many of … they are not rich and in large parts of the country, that kind of income does not get you a big home or lots of vacations or anything else that’s associated with wealth in America. It also would affect too many small businesses if you drew the line below $1 million. There are businesses, small businesses, that struggle, so we believe $1 million is the right line, because in many parts of the country, there are two-income households that earn that much [$250,000]. It doesn’t make them rich. They are firmly in the middle class, same with small business owners in that level.

Since New York is home to a disproportionate number of American taxpayers with incomes of $1 million or more, Schumer is still effectively demanding that the federal government take more from his own state’s income tax base.  The usual effect of a sharp marginal tax hike on a people with broad discretion over the timing and nature of their income is to depress growth in that portion of the tax base, which would inevitably depress revenues for both the state and New York City.

The tax surtax starting point now being pushed by Schumer and other Senate Democrats in Washington is at least consistent with the latest tax hike proposal from Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, who wants to extend the current state tax hike — raising the maximum rate from 6.85 percent to 8.97 percent — only on incomes starting at $1 million. It’s been estimated that Silver’s proposal would raise about $2.65 billion in fiscal 2012-13, or about $1.4 billion less than the current version of the temporary tax due to sunset at the end of this year.

You may also like

Two Dozen School Districts Are Returning to the Polls for Budget Revotes

Voters in 24 New York school districts return to the polls on Tuesday for school budget revotes. Last month, voters in 96 percent of school districts outside New York City conducting votes approved their school budgets for the upcoming year. The 683 sc Read More

Even With Federal Cuts, New York’s Health Funding Would Remain High

New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding under the major budget bill being debated in Washington – a rare and jarring turn of events for a sector accustomed to steadily increas Read More

Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget

The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan: Top lines Read More

Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy

  New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More

After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality

This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck. When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More

New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected

The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More

Hochul Hides the Specifics of a Looming Tax on Health Insurance

The Hochul administration has requested federal approval for a multibillion-dollar "MCO tax" on health plans without announcing the move or providing details to the public. As by l Read More

New Yorkers’ Health Costs Spiral as Officials Take Credit for ‘Savings’

The latest round of health insurance premium hikes announced by New York regulators adds to evidence that state policies are drowning consumers instead of helping them. Late last mo Read More