In delivering on Speaker Sheldon Silver’s session-opening pledge to eliminate taxes on New Yorkers earning less than $30,000, Assembly Democrats have come up with a scheme that would make Rube Goldberg proud.
Keep in mind the households in question already pay little or nothing in taxes, thanks to the state’s generous earned income tax credit (EITC), the Empire Child Credit and the Child and Dependent Care Credit, which reduce income taxes by expanding refunds.
But instead of taking a simpler approach to a relatively small problem — such as expanding the size of existing credits — the Assembly’s one-house bill modifies the existing state personal income tax rate table with language like this:
NOT OVER $25,000 — 0% of adjusted gross income
OVER $25,000 BUT NOT OVER $30,000 — one-sixth of the tax calculated under subparagraph (B) or (C) of this paragraph for every additional $1,000 of excess over $25,000 of adjusted gross income, plus one-sixth of such tax.
Clear as mud to most people — except professional tax preparers.
Reducing the tax burden a bit further for lower income households is a nice idea, but the Assembly’s proposal, with an aggregate price of $62 million in 2012-13 and $160 million in 2013-14, does not offer much individual tax relief. What it will do, through a bizarre back door approach, is make existing tax credits like the EITC a bit more generous while providing some modest tax relief mainly to households without children. For example, a childless couple with income of $25,000 currently pays a token income tax of $340 a year. The Assembly change will save them $6.54 a week.
And, of course, it will add complexity to an already byzantine state tax code. Just what New York needs.
You may also like
Highlights of Albany’s Bloated and Belated Budget
The state Legislature approved the last of nine budget bills Thursday evening, 38 days after the start of the fiscal year. Here are some highlights of the fiscal impact of final spending plan:
Top lines
Read More
Forcing Homes to Switch to Electric Heat is not a Good Policy
New York has some of the most ambitious climate goals in the country: electric school buses by 2035, zero emissions electricity by 2040, etc. Why New Yorkers, who already consume less energy per capita than any state (other than Rhode Island), s Read More
After Tariff Shock, Albany Should Face its New Fiscal Reality
This year, for once, state lawmakers' failure to pass a timely budget could prove to be a stroke of luck.
When President Trump rolled out his on April 2, Albany leaders had not agreed on a spending plan for the f Read More
New York’s Proposed ‘MCO Tax’ Would Generate a Fraction of What Lawmakers Expected
The Hochul administration's proposed "MCO tax" would generate far less than the $4 billion in extra federal aid anticipated by state lawmakers when they approved the concept this spring, according to documents obtained by t Read More
Hochul Hides the Specifics of a Looming Tax on Health Insurance
The Hochul administration has requested federal approval for a multibillion-dollar "MCO tax" on health plans without announcing the move or providing details to the public.
As by l Read More
New Yorkers’ Health Costs Spiral as Officials Take Credit for ‘Savings’
The latest round of health insurance premium hikes announced by New York regulators adds to evidence that state policies are drowning consumers instead of helping them.
Late last mo Read More
Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending
The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget.
Read More
Albany Lawmakers Push a $4 Billion Tax on Health Insurance
Legislative leaders are proposing an additional $4 billion tax on health insurance plans in the upcoming state budget – but withholding specifics of how it would work. Read More