The price of offshore wind is about to go up, and electricity users across the Empire State will be on the hook for it. Two firms developing offshore wind projects — Sunrise Wind and Equinor-bp — have gone to the state Public Service Commission asking for an increase in the price they’ll receive per megawatt-hour of electricity produced.

Given the fiscal realities of the situation, PSC’s only two options are to grant the request or delay the development of wind energy while the state seeks new offshore wind construction bids. Either way, costs will rise.

Policies promoting renewable energy have driven a flurry of offshore wind projects. Globally, 2021 saw a record number of installations, and in the U.S., there was double-digit growth in planned projects from the previous year. And because of a combination of subsidies and technology gains, the levelized cost of offshore wind projects in the U.S. fell to an estimated cost of $84 per megawatt-hour (although that must be compared to around $37 for natural gas and onshore wind).

But this recent growth in the offshore wind industry does not necessarily reflect its long-term health. Two substantial headwinds threaten to make projects uneconomical. One is the recent high inflation, which raised the costs of materials and labor across all industries, and the other is bottlenecked supply chains that are causing a bidding-up of the prices of materials and components needed for building wind turbines.

The problems aren’t confined to New York. Last December, Avangrid, the developers of the massive Commonwealth Wind project in Massachusetts, asked that state’s Department of Public Utilities to cancel its contracts because the agreed-upon price could no longer finance the project. And in Great Britain, wind power projects are also threatened by rising costs.

Unlike most businesses, these companies can’t unilaterally decide to raise their prices to restore profitability. The way windpower projects work is that the relevant government agency seeks bids from potential developers, chooses a winner and agrees to a “strike price” (the price the firm is guaranteed to receive per megawatt hour). McDonalds can raise the price of a hamburger at will if the cost of beef goes up, the windpower developers are legally committed to the agreed-upon strike price regardless of any cost increases they experience.

And while McDonalds can base its prices on what’s happening in the economy right now, offshore wind developers must base their prices on their expectations of how the economy will develop over the multiple years it takes to get permits, design the project, and finally get it built. It’s a guessing game, and they have no control over what happens in the years between making their bid and completing construction. Imagine McDonalds having to commit to a certain hamburger price for 2035 in all new restaurants before beginning construction on them.

Sunrise Wind, for example, in bidding for a windfarm off of Long Island, structured its bid on an assumption that inflation would remain the same as it had in recent years, at about 2 percent per year. But in 2021, inflation hit more than double that, and in 2022 the U.S. inflation rate topped 8 percent, quadruple the assumption on which the bid was based.

Between that and unexpected supply chain pressures, their costs have increased well beyond what they anticipated, while their expected revenues are fixed. Sometimes businesses, because of competitive pressures, have to bite the bullet and accept lower profits or take a loss until they can figure out how to be profitable again. But if they look ahead and see no prospect for ever being profitable, they’ll get out of the game.

That’s where offshore wind power companies stand now regarding projects they successfully bid on years ago. They see no potential for profitability at current strike prices, so they either must get those prices changed or walk away from the projects. What Sunrise and Equinor-bp are specifically asking the Public Service Commission to do is to authorize the New York State Energy and Development Agency (NYSERDA) to amend the agreed upon contracts to allow an inflation adjustment in the strike price.

The PSC is in a tough spot. If Sunrise and Equinor-bp are forced to cancel the agreements they’ve made with New York, the projects will have to be rebid, delaying completion of the projects. The strike price will increase anyway, because any firm submitting a new bid will incorporate recent cost increases into its proposed price. And because of Sunrise’s and Equinor-bp’s advanced state of planning, they will be in a strong position to win the bids again.

So, if the PSC says no to the request, the potential outcome is the same firms getting the same price bump they’re asking for, but with the completion of the projects being delayed, hindering the state’s effort to achieve its goal of 70 percent renewable energy by 2030.

The PSC is in a no-win position, but what is certain is that whatever choice it makes, offshore wind prices are going to rise, and every New York ratepayer will pay their share of the increase.

You may also like

Upstate Catches A Big Break As Offshore Wind Deals Sink

The cancellation of planned offshore wind projects has sparked considerable heartburn and hand-wringing among lawmakers, activists and politically wired businesses and unions, but it’s been good news for the upstate families and businesses who would be paying more than half the cost. For them, each year of delays on scotched projects amounts to future electric-bill savings of upwards of $1 billion—and gives Albany another chance to find a better, less expensive way to go green. Read More

Albany’s Green Machine Goes Rogue

Upstate electricity customers today got what seemed like good news when Equinor pulled the plug on its Empire Wind 2 (EW2) offshore wind project, one of several being funded by New York customers as far away as Buffalo and Plattsburgh. The announcement however is mainly theater, because Equinor looks poised to squeeze even more money from ratepayers—in a manner that should have state lawmakers deeply concerned about how little control they’ve retained over state renewable energy spending. Read More

Another battery flop zaps NY taxpayers

Plans to lure a Canadian battery company to the Hudson Valley with a slew of government incentives, including job-creation tax credits, loans, and federal subsidies, appear to be a dud. It’s a reminder that when it comes to picking winners in the energy-storage space, taxpayers are often losers. Read More

New Wind Energy Costs Blow the Doors Off Projections

The myth that New York can replace fossil fuel power plants with cheap renewable energy has begun to crumble under renewable developers’ demands for higher prices to offset inflation and supply chain challenges.  Read More

First Annual CLCPA Report Indicates High Costs, Low Benefits

A major deception on emissions reductions lies at the heart of the New York Department of Public Service’s first annual report on implementation of the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. Read More

Micron vs. New York Energy Policy 

Computer chip manufacturer Micron has revealed that by the 2040s its Onondaga County factories are going to be sucking up enough electricity to power New Hampshire and Vermont combined. Read More

Offshore Wind Lulls Threaten NY Energy Reliability 

The volatility of wind off the Atlantic coast will challenge New York's ability to keep the lights on according to a recent analysis from the New York State Reliability Corporation. Read More

Unlikely Pair Tries to Blow Open Secret Wind Deal 

Offshore wind developers, citing changing market conditions, are demanding what could be billions of dollars in additional subsidies—but refusing to let the public see how much or explain their reasoning. Read More