Gov. Paterson will soon get an excel lent chance to show seriousness of purpose when lawmakers yet again stick their fists in the public till – this time with a labor-driven measure that sets minimum health-care perks for public-sector retirees.

The Legislature could pass the bill as early as this week; Paterson should veto it out of hand.

On the preceding page, E.J. McMahon of the Empire Center for New York Policy lays out the details. Bottom line: The bill would make it impossible for state and local governments to trim health benefits for public-sector retirees – no matter how badly they need to do so to balance their budgets.

Without a doubt, Albany, and governments across the state, will then face an increasingly painful fiscal squeeze.

That’s becoming more evident, thanks to a 2004 national accounting rule that forces governments to more honestly report their obligations to retirees.

Such reporting is increasingly highlighting huge shortfalls in funding for future benefits. As McMahon notes, New York’s state government alone faces a whopping $50 billion in unfunded liabilities.

Meanwhile, retiree health coverage already represents the fastest-growing portion of public-sector employee perks.

And, of course, state and local budgets already face multibillion-dollar gaps.

Clearly, the need to cut back will soon become intense.

No wonder pro-labor forces are pinning their hopes to this bill: They want union members held harmless even when it becomes obvious that their lush benefits – relative to the average taxpayer’s package – aren’t even close to affordable.

No wonder, too, that they’ve resorted to a less-than-candid approach about their plans – pushing a “temporary” floor for benefits, when they reasonably expect it to be permanent.

And they pretend they’ll leave the question of benefits to a “task force” – even while the bill would stack the panel with pro-labor members.

Paterson clearly understands the fiscal dilemma facing New York. He’s warned of the grim budgetary impacts of a “reeling” economy and the need to “tighten our belts.”

But how will he – and local officials – rein in spending and keep taxes down if everybody’s hands are tied when it comes to retiree benefits?

Paterson’s predecessors, Democrat Eliot Spitzer and Republican George Pataki, both understood the fiscal havoc such a bill could wreak; both vetoed it.

Paterson needs to do likewise – for New York’s fiscal stability, and for his own credibility.

Here’s hoping he doesn’t let New Yorkers down.

Read article here

You may also like

State’s Growing Budget Hole Threatens NYC Jobs and Aid as Congress Takes a Holiday

“The biggest problem for the state is the enormous, recurring structural budget gap starting next year and into the future,” said E.J. McMahon of the conservative-leaning Empire Center. “Cuomo clearly hopes that starting in 2021, (Democratic presidential candidate Joseph) Biden and a Democratic Congress will provide states and local government a couple of year’s worth of added stimulus. Read More

How Andrew Cuomo became ‘maybe the most powerful governor’ in U.S.

Ed McKinley ALBANY — When the New York Constitution was reorganized nearly 100 years ago to give the governor more power over the budget process,  noted there was a risk of making “the governor a czar." M Read More

Study disputes Cuomo on Trump tax package; experts say it’s complicated

Michael Gormley ALBANY — A new study by a conservative think tank says President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax law gave most New Yorkers a tax cut, even as Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo insists on repealing the measure because he says it will cost New Yo Read More

Empire Center sues Department of Health over nursing home records

Johan Sheridan ALBANY, N.Y. () — The Empire Center filed a  against the state Department of Health on Friday. “This case isn’t about assigning blame or embarrassing political leaders,” said Bill Hammond, the Empire Center’s Read More

Good news: That New York pork isn’t going out the door after all

The Empire Center first reported Tuesday that grants — 226 of them, totaling $46 million, to recipients selected by the governor and individual state lawmakers — seemed to still be going ahead. Read More

New York Lawmakers Seek Independent Probe of Nursing-Home Coronavirus Deaths

With lingering questions about how the novel coronavirus killed thousands of New Yorkers who lived in nursing homes, a group of state lawmakers is pushing to create an independent commission to get answers from the state Department of Health. Read More

Policy analyst: Cuomo wrong to write-off nursing home criticism as political conspiracy

“The importance of discussing this and getting the true facts out is to understand what did and didn’t happen so we can learn from it in case this happens again,” Hammond said. Read More

EDITORIAL: Nursing home report requires a second opinion

No doubt, the Health Department and the governor would like this report to be the final word on the subject. But if it’s all the same with them, we’d still like a truly independent review. Read More