Adjusting for inflation, the 11.3 percent pay hike awarded by an arbitration panel to Local 100 of the Transport Workers’ Union (TWU) this week appears to be the transit workers’ biggest score since the disastrously generous contract settlement that ended their 1966 strike. Indeed, by some measures, this year’s increase will be even larger.
The 1966 deal cost $60 million–about $400 million in today’s dollars. This week’s arbitration award will cost $600 $465 million over three years. And that largely unbudgeted expense, when fully effective, will eat up nearly one-third one-fifth of the new payroll tax imposed under the MTA bailout.*
Of course, a lot has changed over the past 43 years. For example:
- In 1966, while the city’s economic strength was eroding, it was also benefiting from a strong national economy. Wages, personal income and employment were still growing, and Wall Street was booming. Today, New York is struggling to emerge from its deepest and sharpest economic downturn since the Great Depression. Much of Wall Street is in financial ruins, its largest survivors propped up by the federal government.
- In 1966, the subway system was run by the city, and Mayor John Lindsay–or “Linsley,” as then-TWU boss Mike Quill called him– could be personally held accountable for the bungled contract negotiations. Today, the transit system is part of a state-controlled authority. The MTA’s decision last fall to punt its largest and costliest labor agreement to arbitration conveniently leaves no one to hold accountable, other than the unelected “public” appointee to the arbitration panel–real estate lawyer and former deputy mayor John Zuccotti.
Revising from our post earlier this week, here’s a chart comparing the TWU arbitration award to current economic indicators and projections (from the city Office of Management and Budget):
CORRECTION: The base year for these three-year trend comparisons is 2008; thus the chart title should read “2008-11”
* This line originally was incorrect, because it conflated cumulative with annual costs. The annual cost of the pay raise will reach $272 million in 2011, according to the arbitrators’ opinion. This is 18 percent of the amount that the payroll tax is likely to be raising by then, assuming no significant next increase in total wages in region during the meantime.
You may also like
How 1199 Earns its Reputation as Albany’s No. 1 Labor Power Broker
For the fourth time in six years, the president of New York's largest health-care union, George Gresham of 1199SEIU, has won the top spot on the "Labor Power 100" list from City &am Read More
How a Medicaid ‘Cut’ Could Lead to More Unionization of Home Care Aides
A money-saving maneuver in the newly enacted Medicaid budget could end up increasing costs in the long term – by paving the way for more unionization of the state's burgeoning home health workforce.
Read More
Pols Craft More Handouts for Sinking Construction Unions
New York’s construction unions, facing a decades-long decline, are employing a time-honored tactic: getting state government to stop people from competing with them. Read More
Union Rallies Long Island Pols Against NYC Kids
New York’s statewide teachers union has been cashing in political chits as it seeks to block new charter schools from opening in New York City, asking the senators and assemblymembers Read More
MTA’s Casino Funding Takes Voters For A Ride
As the Legislature prepares to authorize new downstate casinos, some voters who supported the amendment are discovering they came up snake-eyes. Read More
Utility board turns into union tool
The idea that the PSC would artificially drive electricity costs higher to benefit a political constituency represents a new low. Read More
New Docs Raise Big Questions About NY’s Megafab Mega-Deal
The Hochul Administration published a pair of documents concerning the Micron Megafab deal that raise more questions than they answer. Read More
City union scandal isn’t NY’s first
One of New York City’s largest public-sector unions has been effectively taken over by its national parent after an audit revealed extensive financial mismanagement. It’s the latest example of misconduct made possible under New York’s public-sector collective bargaining rules that force the government to collect hundreds of millions of dollars annually without any safeguards on how the funds are spent. Read More