stock_ticker-150x150-7461692On the heels of a sub-par fiscal year, New York State’s largest public pension fund has just reported another weak quarter for investment returns.

State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli today said the Common Retirement Fund (CRF), of which he is sole trustee, had gained just 0.52 percent during the three months ending June 30, the first quarter of the fund’s 2015-16 fiscal year. The CRF finances pension benefits for nearly all non-New York City state and local government retirees, other than educational professionals.

The poor result was not a surprise, given the sideways movement in the stock market during the same period. On March 31, the S&P 500 closed at 2067. On June 30, it stood at 2063—and since then, it has barely rebounded, to 2083 as of this morning—which makes for what DiNapoli called “a challenging investment climate.” As of 2014, the CRF had allocated nearly 55 percent of its investments to foreign and domestic stocks, and another 17 percent to private equity, real estate and other higher-risk holdings.

The pension systems’ contribution rates are based on the assumption that the CRF will earn an average return of 7.5 percent.  To hit that target in what remains of fiscal 2015-16, the fund will need to earn an average of nearly 2.5 percent in each of the next three quarters.  That’s a fairly tall order, requiring an investment climate that is far less “challenging.”

The actuary for the state pension funds is expected to recommend lowering the rate of return assumption. A lower rate will require higher employer (i.e., taxpayer) contributions—but in the opinion of most economists and financial analysts, it would be far more realistic.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.

The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More