There are two versions of the bill extending but tweaking the state’s binding arbitration law on Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s website. The three-decade-old law, which sets the process for the settling of labor disputes between localities and their police and fire unions, was scheduled to sunset later this month. The governor was determined to see it customized to ensure that arbitration panels give greater weight to a locality’s “ability to pay” as well as to comparisons of contracts for similar communities and similar unions within the given locality.

The only apparent differences between 21 and 21R are these:

  • The new sunset date is changed from two years to three years. This was a simple error, according to those briefed beforehand on the measure’s provisions. The binding arbitration statute was renewed every two years until 2009, when the Legislature gave it a four-year lifespan.
  • The effective date of the legislation’s effect on current labor disputes is adjusted. In the first version of the bill, eligible disputes that have been the subject of a petition to move to binding arbitration prior to June 14 are exempt from the new system — that is, fiscally distressed communities could be on the hook for larger settlements. In the amended bill, the definition of exempted disputes is expanded to include those that had prompted a declaration of impasse with the Public Employment Relations Board — the penultimate step on the path to binding arbitration — going back to April 1.

This change means that roughly 20 current labor disputes that would have been eligible for the new system will now be arbitrated under the old one. Those include a longstanding dispute between the City of Syracuse and its firefighters union, which was the subject of an impasse declaration last month.

E.J. McMahon of the Empire Center first reported the change in the bill earlier Thursday on his blog The Torch.

The change, it won’t surprise you to learn, was sought by the unions, and was described by those with knowledge of the negotiations as part of securing final agreement on the bill.

“There are many drafts of this bill,” Cuomo spokesman Rich Azzopardi said by way of explaining the double-posting. “The one that was ultimately introduced is the final three-way agreement” between the governor and the Legislature.

Tags:

You may also like

Editorial: Cuomo’s problematic Medicaid maneuvers

“It’s everything that’s wrong with Albany in one ugly deal,” Bill Hammond, a health policy expert at the fiscally conservative Empire Center, told The Times. Read More

MTA, LIRR union relationship worse than ever; up next is collective bargaining

The MTA’s heightened focus on overtime follows an April financial report from the Empire Center for Public Policy that revealed alarmingly high overtime rates among some MTA employees, including former LIRR chief measurement officer Thomas Caputo, who made $344,147 in overtime on top of his base salary of $117,499. Read More

CLOCK TICKING ON MTA OVERTIME GLUT AS UNION SOURS ON GOVERNOR

An April report from the Empire Center for Public Policy highlighted a 16% surge last year in overtime costs at the MTA — where the $418 million payroll cost in 2018 was $82 million more than what the authority expects to take in from the last fare and toll increases. Read More

EDITORIAL: Prevailing wage leads to prevailing waste

Research has found that prevailing wage requirements increase the cost of construction. In New York, a 2017 report released by the Empire Center for Public Policy found that prevailing wage requirements inflated the cost of publicly funded construction projects in the state by 13 to 25 percent. Read More

Post-Janus, battle for dues paying union members heats up

The battle over public-sector union dues in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Janus v. AFSCME decision heated up on Wednesday as the Cuomo Administration and outside groups offered up differing opinions on the importance of membership cards. Read More

Man behind Janus case says public unions will have to sell themselves better after Supreme Court ruling

The Illinois state worker behind a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that public workers cannot be forced to pay union dues said Thursday morning that the unions will be forced to do a better job selling themselves. Read More

Unions fight back after Supreme Court defeat

“The unions had said the loss of agency fees would diminish their political power,” the Empire Center’s Ken Girardin explained. “Reducing their power would put them on a level playing field” with government officials while negotiating, perhaps yielding less-lucrative contracts. Read More

Supreme Court blow to mandatory union dues likely to have big impact in New York

The Supreme Court ruling Wednesday striking down requirements that public-sector employees covered by union contracts pay union fees even if they are not union members could have a dramatic impact in New York. Read More