A little-noticed change to the New York Health Act has big implications for the bridge-and-tunnel crowd.

Under the latest version of the single-payer bill—which has broad support from Democrats in the Legislature—hundreds of thousands of commuters from other states would face the replacement of their current health insurance with a Medicaid-like plan funded with tax dollars and managed by Albany.

A change made to the bill last May—which was overshadowed by the pandemic—provides that the new state-run health plan would cover everyone “employed or self-employed full-time in the state” in addition to 20 million New York residents.

As with many other parts of the bill, pivotal details are left to be filled in later, including the definition of “full time.”

Another unanswered question is the fate of commuters’ spouses and children. Many of them currently rely on employer-sponsored family coverage that would cease to exist, but the bill does not explicitly make them eligible for the New York plan.

As before, commuters and their employers would be subject to the steep new payroll tax that’s necessary to finance the single-payer plan in lieu of what’s currently paid in premiums. Self-employed commuters would also face an additional tax on their non-payroll income.

The legislation does not specify the rates or brackets, but the two new levies would need to raise an estimated $139 billion, more than doubling the revenue from all current state taxes combined.

Previously, the legislation took for granted that out-of-state commuters would continue to rely on commercial insurance—and allowed them and their employers to claim the cost of that coverage as a credit against New York’s single-payer taxes.

However, that credit is available only for employees who are ineligible for state coverage, so full-time commuters would no longer qualify under the revised bill.

The new taxes are meant to be levied on a progressive scale, imposing higher rates on higher incomes. By design, many lower-income individuals and their employers would save money compared to the current cost of private insurance, while higher income people will pay more than the status quo—in some cases, substantially more.

Employers who don’t currently offer health benefits to all or part of their workforce would also face a significant new cost.

The dividing line between winners and losers is impossible to determine precisely without more details on the tax rates and brackets. On average, however, commuters earn higher incomes than resident employees and therefore are more likely to come out behind financially.

Another possible issue will be finding out-of-state doctors, hospitals and pharmacies willing to do business with the state-operated plan, whose reimbursement rates are yet to be established. New York-based providers will have no choice but to accept what the state pays, but providers elsewhere could choose not to participate—as they often do with other government health plans, such as Medicare and Medicaid, as well as private insurance.

Overall, single-payer would alter the cost-benefit equation of traveling into New York for work—creating a new incentive for higher-income commuters and their employers to relocate out of state.

The complexities surrounding commuters add to a long list of risks and downsides to enacting New York Health Act. The bill would disrupt the existing coverage of every New Yorker, send the state’s tax burden to unprecedented heights and put one-fifth of the state’s economy under the direct control of a state government notorious for mismanagement and corruption.

Yet the proposal appears closer than ever to becoming law. It passed the Assembly in four of the past six years and recently gained 33 cosponsors in the Senate—where 32 votes are enough for approval.

Commuters aren’t represented electorally in Albany. But they—along with resident New Yorkers—have a lot at stake in what happens next.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

The Looming Collapse of a Long-Term Care Insurer Raises Questions for DFS

As the Hochul administration presses for the creation of a "guaranty fund" to bail out failed health insurers, the state is quietly moving to seize a small company that could be the fund's first target. Read More

While pleading for money in Albany, hospitals and nursing homes spend at the bargaining table

Friday's announcement of an amended labor contract for New York City-area hospitals and nursing homes sends a contradictory message about the financial condition of the state's health-care industry. Read More

The Essential Plan’s accumulated surplus will soon break $10 billion

The accumulated surplus of the state-run Essential Plan had ballooned to $9.9 billion as of the end of December, putting it on track to break $10 billion by the close of the fiscal year on March 31, according to newly obtained records from the comptroller's office. Read More

The Hochul administration seeks more federal money for its overfunded Essential Plan

In a move that ought to raise eyebrows in Washington, the Hochul administration is requesting additional federal money for New York's Essential Plan, which is already sitting on more than $9 billion after years of running a multi-billion-dollar surplus. Read More

Hochul puts Medicaid spending on a steeper slope

Governor Hochul is releasing the brakes on Medicaid, allowing state spending on the safety-net health plan to increase more than twice as fast as it typically did during the Cuomo administration. Read More

Despite working at home, commuters kept paying a big share of NY taxes

Average daily office occupancy in New York City has bounced back from 2020-21 lows, but by most accounts remains well below pre-pandemic norms. Read More

Hochul’s agenda mostly sidesteps health care

Governor Hochul gave health care surprisingly little attention in her State of the State speech on Tuesday – a sign that taking on dysfunction in one-sixth of the state's economy ranks low on her list of priorities. Read More

Federal omnibus deal has big implications for New York Medicaid

The big spending bill heading for a vote in Washington this week would scramble the outlook for Medicaid in next year's state budget, mostly for the better. The $1.7 trillion federa Read More

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!