After tweaking a few of their house rules and adopting a state budget on time for the first time in 20 years, many New York State legislators would have you believe they’ve fixed all or most of what’s broken in Albany.

Don’t believe it. Chronically late budgets were only one symptom of much deeper, more pervasive problems.

The lack of openness and accountability in the state Capitol remains as striking as ever. So does the paucity of debate on matters large and small. But yet another concern, which receives less attention than it deserves, is the sheer cost and inefficiency of the place.

Pegged at $208 million in the new fiscal year, the Legislature’s budget now runs to nearly $1 million for each New York State senator and assemblyman. On a per-member basis, New York’s expenditures are three times the national average, trailing only California and roughly tied with Pennsylvania.

The budget is driven by two factors: salaries and staffing.

New York legislators receive base pay of $79,500 a year, second only to California’s $99,000, including the same generous level of guaranteed pension and post-retirement health benefits available to all public employees. At the discretion of the Senate majority leader and Assembly speaker, New York members also can receive leadership stipends (or “lulus”) of at least $8,000, plus $140 in expenses for each day in Albany. The national average for all salaried state legislators is just over $31,000 a year.

Supporting New York’s legislators are roughly 3,700 employees, including the nation’s largest full-time state legislative staff – who are distributed very unevenly among members and central committee and “conference” functions. In both houses, senior members of the majority get the most and junior members of the minority get the least.

Politically “marginal” members receive extra staff support and other added help – which, along with gerrymandering of the district map, helps to ensure that no incumbent legislator is ever truly “marginal” at all.

So what do they do to justify it all? For one thing, they churn out bills – 16,892 in 2002 alone, which was more than twice the amount in the next most prolific state legislature. Fortunately, only a very small percentage are ever enacted.

Here are three reforms that could save money while simultaneously empowering members:

Tightly limit bill introductions. Thirty or so bills per member per session should be more than enough to address the needs of New Yorkers.

Equalize the distribution of member budgets and staff resources while reducing the number of superfluous central staff.

Eliminate lulus. All members should receive the same salary and the same basic staff allotment, regardless of seniority or party affiliation.

As for the level of the salary, that has been the subject of considerable debate over the years.

Some (such as Syracuse University Professor Grant Reeher, writing in this space) have argued that a better-paid, officially full-time Legislature would do a better job. But given the recent performance of Albany’s already well-compensated, virtually full-time lawmakers, many New York taxpayers may understandably find themselves more attracted to the opposite approach.

You may also like

Cuomo’s Buffalo Billion was beyond corrupt

The overarching scandal here wasn’t bid-rigging or the pay-to-play pattern in the developers’ contributions to the governor’s reelection campaign. At the root was a simply awful public policy — corporate welfare on steroids — that neither Cuomo nor most of his critics have definitively renounced, even now. Read More

Corruption cauldron: To fix Albany — term limits

The corruption case against Speaker Sheldon Silver has prompted more calls for reform of the Legislature. Read More

Sticking New York with unaffordable debt

Skyrocketing public-pension obligations have generated concern across the country, especially in the wake of high-profile bankruptcies of Detroit and Stockton, Calif. In New York, an even larger burden looms in the form of lifetime health-insurance coverage promised to state and local government employees. Yet at least one house of the Legislature is considering a bill that would effectively prevent any effort to reduce this unaffordable debt. Read More

Freedom of Information Law needs to catch up to technology advances

In total, the state's multiple levels of government burn through more than $190 billion a year from their own revenue sources, mainly taxes. Another $60 billion comes the federal government - which has its own claim on our wallets. But where does it all go? Thanks to the digital revolution, anyone with access to the Internet can begin to find some answers to that question. Read More

The ‘death tax’ hurts state’s edge

New York is now one of only 14 states still imposing any tax on estates — the cash, land, houses, financial assets and other property left by deceased residents. The state estate tax, also called the "death tax," is triggered once assets exceed $1 million. By contrast, the federal government only taxes estates worth more than $5.34 million, a figure that will rise with inflation every year. Read More

End unnecessary barriers to state growth

Major residential, commercial and industrial developments throughout the country are subject to an array of federal and state laws designed to protect the environment. They're buttressed nearly everywhere by local land-use regulations addressing the community impacts of such projects. Read More

Savior of The Empire State

The governor who led New York State out of the fiscal crisis of the 1970s died Sunday at the age of 92. Read More

Pataki’s Smaller Gov’t

Much of Gov. Pataki's proposed state budget (his costly expansion of health care, in particular) is a far cry from the leaner, cleaner fiscal plans of his first term. But in at least one crucial respect, New York's revenue shortfall has prompted a welcome return to his budgetary roots: For the first time in seven years, the governor is launching a concerted effort to reduce the size of the state work force. Read More