condom1-300x199-7735367The Comprehensive Contraception Coverage Act, which is speeding toward passage in Albany, is typically portrayed as protecting women. As a practical matter, though, some of its prime beneficiaries will be condom buyers who are predominantly male.

The bill mandates insurance coverage for all forms of birth control, which is also required by federal law. It also prohibits copayments for contraception, which are already banned by state regulation. These provisions are useful only as backstops against future changes in Washington or in the governor’s office.

But the legislation does go beyond the status quo in certain ways, and one of them is adding insurance coverage for over-the-counter products. Condoms are one of the few contraceptives sold without prescriptions, and by far the most popular.

Assuming the condom mandate becomes law, it will raise awkward questions: Can insurers limit coverage to generic latex products that cost $19 for 100? Or do they have to pay for brand-name lambskin at $5 each?

The bill further requires insurers to provide up to 12 months’ supply of contraceptives per visit to the pharmacy. The Cuomo administration will presumably have to issue regulations declaring how many condoms a consumer needs during the course of a year and setting guidelines on materials and styles.

The proposal also goes beyond current law by eliminating copayments and deductibles for sterilization procedures, such as vasectomies and tubal ligation – which raises a question of fairness. Why are these elective procedures being exempted from cost-sharing when necessary surgeries, such as mastectomies for breast cancer, are not?

A late amendment, added on Friday, establishes a “prescriber prevails” rule for contraceptives, the first time this policy has been applied to commercial insurance. This gives doctors additional authority to insist on a particular brand of device or medication, whether or not it is on an insurer’s “formulary” of covered drugs.

This seems largely redundant: The bill separately specifies that insurers must cover at least one brand of every drug or device approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Existing law also includes an appeals process for denied claims, so that doctors can override a formulary restrictions when medically necessary (if, for example, a patient is allergic to the generic version of a product.)

The state has previously used “prescriber prevails” only for recipients of Medicaid, and only with respect to certain conditions, such as serious mental illness and AIDS. Adding it to the contraceptive mandate sets a precedent that, if extended to other types of medication, would undermine efforts to control pharmaceutical costs.

Governor Cuomo has included the Comprehensive Contraception Coverage Act as part of his Women’s Agenda. It has been paired with the Reproductive Health Act, which would reinforce and expand abortion rights in state law. The Legislature is planning to pass both measures on Jan. 22, the 46th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision.

Beneath the symbolism, however, the contraception bill is an insurance mandate – and the usual warnings apply: Since large, self-insured employers are exempt from state regulation, it directly affects only small employers and people who buy insurance in the non-group market. It does not make contraceptives “free,” but shifts the costs to other consumers, adding (albeit slightly in the case) to what are already the highest premiums in the lower 48 states.

 

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

As the session winds down, watch for health costs to go up

The closing days of the legislative session could prove costly for New York health insurance consumers as lawmakers push a raft of proposals that would make coverage more expensive, harder to find, or both. Read More

Pandemic deaths in New York nursing homes show no correlation with staffing levels

Nursing home staffing levels remained an unreliable indicator of Covid-19 risk for residents through the second year of the pandemic. Read More

Hochul faces a test on health insurance costs

With judicious use of her veto pen this month, Governor Hochul could draw a line against spiraling health expenses for consumers and taxpayers. Several health insurance-related bill Read More

New York’s health benefits remain the second-costliest in the U.S.

New York's health benefit costs increased faster than the national average in 2020, leaving it with the second-least affordable coverage in the U.S. The state's average total cost f Read More

A Study of COVID-19 in Nursing Homes Raises Doubt About New York’s Minimum Staffing Law

A newly published study of COVID-19 in nursing homes links larger numbers of employees to higher rates of infection and death for residents – raising fresh doubts about New York's recently enacted "safe staffing" law. Read More

Proposed minimum staffing law could push some nursing homes to employ fewer licensed nurses

Some New York nursing homes are likely to scale back their use of higher-trained personnel if proposed minimum staffing ratios become law, according to a review of existing employment patterns. Read More

New York’s Medicaid and Public Health Crises Get Short Shrift in the New State Budget

In spite of an ongoing pandemic and spiraling Medicaid costs, New York's health-care system received surprisingly little attention in the new state budget. On issue after issue, law Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100

General Inquiries: Info@EmpireCenter.org

Press Inquiries: Press@EmpireCenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.

Empire Center Logo Enjoying our work? Sign up for email alerts on our latest news and research.
Together, we can make New York a better place to live and work!