Based on recent history, a “debate” between Governor Andrew Cuomo and his four general election opponents is likely to shed more heat than light on the issues facing the Empire State today. As typically formatted, such events are little more than joint news conferences—yielding a series of 30- to 90-second soundbites, never settling for long on any subject, and occasionally veering into testiness.

Thirty-six years ago, however, two notably literate and intelligent candidates for governor of New York set a higher bar. The public encounters of Mario M. Cuomo and Lewis E. Lehrman in the closing weeks of the 1982 gubernatorial campaign produced a substantive, often lively, at times intense, but consistently civil exchange of ideas.

lehrman-cuomo-3405591Image from taped-off-air first debate, used with permission of WNET/Thirteen

The Empire Center has unearthed videos of three of the five Cuomo-Lehrman debates, shared here as an example of how much (and, in some ways, how little) has changed in New York politics over the intervening decades.

“National Overtones”

Ronald Reagan was in the second year of his presidency and New York City’s mid-1970s financial crisis was still fresh in memory when Cuomo and Lehrman vied to succeed Governor Hugh L. Carey, the two-term Democrat who had engineered the city’s recovery from virtual bankruptcy.

In candidate profiles that ran on facing pages the weekend before the general election, The New York Times billed New York’s 1982 gubernatorial race as “A Referendum With National Overtones,” pitting “The Old Liberalism” against “The New Right”.

Cuomo, Carey’s lieutenant governor, had won the Democratic gubernatorial nomination in an upset primary victory over Mayor Edward Koch—gaining a measure of revenge for his loss to Koch in the 1977 mayoral primary runoff. The incumbent governor had endorsed the mayor, but Cuomo nonetheless ran mainly on Carey’s moderately conservative record of spending restraint and tax cuts, which he rebranded as “progressive pragmatism.” (Indeed, Cuomo’s opening statement in the first debate could have been lifted from Carey’s script in this 1978 campaign commercial.)

Lehrman, the Republican-Conservative, was making his first run for elected office—a Pennsylvania native who earned a fortune building his family’s modest wholesale grocery into the Rite Aid drugstore chain, and a thoughtful conservative who had given hawkish fiscal policy advice to Reagan. Backed by a stack of position papers, Lehrman stressed he was running a “campaign of ideas”—with massive state tax cuts as the centerpiece of his “economic renewal plan.”

Cuomo’s campaign relied on New York’s remaining urban Democratic machines and on the public employee unions whose support had made possible his primary win. Lehrman, only tepidly supported by legislative Republicans and GOP leaders, countered with a media-intensive campaign. He ultimately spent $14 million on the general election and Republican primary combined, nearly three times as much as Cuomo.

Three encounters

The first Cuomo-Lehrman debate, sponsored by the New York Post, was held Oct. 7, 1982, in a ballroom of Manhattan’s Sheraton Hotel, before an audience of politicians, union activists and business leaders.

As shown in the video, Post publisher Roger Wood introduced the candidates and explained the format, which was supposed to feature questions from a panel of three reporters. But the candidates mostly ignored the ground rules, plowing through their introductory remarks into a free-flowing, nearly hour-long exchange—with Cuomo the clear winner based on his platform skills alone, as summarized in a subsequent a subsequent column by Sydney H. Schanberg of The New York Times.


Copyright WNET/Thirteen. Private recording of original broadcast posted here with permission of WNET/Thirteen.

A few weeks later, the two candidates squared off on ABC-TV’s “This Week With David Brinkley,” answering questions from Brinkley and columnist George Will, linked below.

In their final debate, aired the weekend before the Nov. 2 election, Cuomo and Lehrman faced off in a Manhattan TV studio for a special hour-long edition of “Inside Albany,” the weekly capital-based public affairs show. The candidates answered questions from the program’s knowledgeable hosts, Dave Hepp and Peg Breen, a format that allowed for a healthy dose of give-and-take.

Video link courtesy of Inside Albany Records, Special Collections Research Center, Syracuse University Libraries, and WMHT. Note technical limitation: Program begins 2:26 into recording.

As summarized by The New York Times account, Cuomo and Lehrman “sharply disagreed on how the state should spend its money, how much it should spend—and even on the very nature of the state’s financial outlook for next year.” (At one point, roughly 32:06 into the program, Cuomo flashed a faintly quizzical look when Lehrman said the state “may very well need to consider” a constitutional property tax cap modeled on limits in California and Massachusetts—an idea that would be implemented in statutory form, 30 years later, under Cuomo’s son.)

Postscript

Cuomo ultimately defeated Lehrman by 180,000 votes (51 to 48 percent), the third narrowest winning margin of the 18 New York gubernatorial elections in the post-World War II era.

Lehrman never ran for public office again. An investment banker well known for his advocacy of a return to the gold standard, he has devoted much of his time and resources over the past 30 years to organizations focused on public policy, historical research and American studies, including the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. Now 80, he has authored or co-authored eight books, and is a noted Lincoln scholar.

Mario Cuomo served three terms as governor, coming close to a run for the presidency in 1992, before losing to Republican George Pataki in 1994. Before, during and after his time in office, he published several books of his collected speeches and diaries—and his own book of reflections on Lincoln. Cuomo died, hailed as a “liberal beacon,” age 82, on January 1, 2015—the day his son was sworn in for a second term as governor.

You may also like

Medicaid Overdose

Forty-four percent of the state’s population, including 60 percent of New York City residents, were enrolled in state-sponsored coverage through Medicaid or the Essential Plan as of September 2024—but more than 3 million appear to have incomes above the programs' eligibility limits. Read More

New York Is a Cautionary Tale on Home Care

Fans of ’s “Medicare at Home” proposal should study up on New York’s bloated home healthcare system, which covers about 850,000 people. Its large scale and rapid growth embody a cent Read More

Hochul bows to health-worker union’s $9B senior-care power play that could bust NY’s budget

Gov. Hochul’s overhaul of the  reached a milestone last week when she named a Georgia-based company as the winning bidder to be the program’s statewide “fiscal intermediary” — and to replace  that currently handle those duties. The  dre Read More

Another Voice: Albany’s MTA congestion pricing battles have implications for Western New York

Gov. Kathy Hochul has taken blistering criticism for postponing congestion pricing, a long-planned $15 toll on drivers entering lower Manhattan meant to reduce traffic — and collect $15 tolls. Most of the drama may be playing out in New York City, but pay attention, upstate: you stand to lose — or win — in this fight. Read More

Another Voice: Money Isn’t the problem for New York schools – the lawmakers are

Anyone wondering how New York consistently has the nation’s highest public school spending but below-average student outcomes got a succinct explanation from Albany earlier this month. Read More

Court’s mail-in voting decision is a slap in the face to NY’s voters

So much for “no means no.” That’s the message from the state Court of Appeals, which ruled last week that New Yorkers don’t need an excuse to cast an absentee ballot by mail when they’re otherwise able to vote in person — even though the voters themselves have directly rejected such a measure. Read More

Hochul’s futile ‘energy summit’ can’t resolve NY’s impossible green goals

It’s a pity New York cannot power its economy on hubris, but state officials this week gave it a try. Read More

History and Tradition Weigh Against No-Excuse Mail-In Voting in New York

Well-founded or not, a majority of New Yorkers who voted in 2021 had misgivings on the merits of no-excuse absentee voting. They rejected the same scheme the Early Mail Voting Law now imposes. They voted to maintain the status quo of the prior 55 years and their will should prevail because the Early Mail Voting Act is unconstitutional as a matter of legal interpretation and the history and tradition in New York's Constitution. Read More