Governor Cuomo today unveiled proposed “pension reform” legislation that follows exactly the outlines he began leaking to the media a month ago — which is a disappointment, if not exactly a surprise.  Certainly if Cuomo’s pension program ends here, it will undermine the governor’s attempts to portray himself as a “transformational” reformer.

For newly hired employees, at both the state and city level, Cuomo would keep intact the existing defined-benefit pension system while reducing benefits, raising retirement ages and increasing employee contributions.  While it will be labelled “Tier 6,” Cuomo’s plan might more accurately be described as Tier 5-A — a few steps beyond David Paterson’s 2009 pension reform without breaking the defined-benefit (DB) mold.  Cuomo isn’t going anywhere near a defined-contribution (DC) retirement alternative, not even as an option, although he floated a few trial balloons in that direction as recently as a month ago.

Public employee unions will howl bloody murder over this proposal, but don’t be fooled. If history is any guide, assuming yet another new “tier” is ultimately adopted, they will lobby to restore benefits to current levels long before anyone in the new plan reaches retirement age.

Even the parts of the proposal that sound far-reaching do not go as far as they could.  For example, the governor’s bill would eliminate overtime and accumulated vacation pay from “final average salary,” or FAS, used to calculate pension benefits, eliminating an important source of pension enrichment for cops and firefighters.  That’s good as far as it goes.  But there is no mention of excluding from FAS the differential or holiday pay commonly collected by the same workers.

Another positive aspect of the bill is that it would apply to New York City municipal workers as well as all other state and local workers.

However, while Cuomo’s bill promises to reduce the “expected long-term rate” of employer contributions by more than half, it will remain impossible for employers to project their pension costs more than a year  or so in advance.  That’s the nature of the DB system he would preserve.

Under Cuomo’s proposal, New York’s public pension funds would continue to systematically understate the true cost and value of benefits, misrepresent the size of long-term liabilities associated with keeping pension promises, and expose future taxpayers to massive, open-ended financial risks that can result in skyrocketing costs.

In other words, he isn’t fixing the fundamental problem here.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.

The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More