Governors often veto legislation on narrow technical grounds, effectively leaving the door ajar for sponsors of bad bills to try again with a somewhat different approach. But that’s not the case with Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s just-released Veto Message 23 of 2011, rejecting a union-backed measure that would have allowed school districts to cover a portion of their teacher pension costs with bonds.

screen-shot-2011-07-13-at-33913-pm-9564753Here’s the meat of the veto message:

When I took office earlier this year, I made a firm commitment to the people of this State that the days of irresponsible fiscal practices are over. I pledged to put an end to the unsustainable spending and rampant borrowing that has burdened New Yorkers with some of the highest property and school taxes in the nation. To that end, this year, with the help of the Legislature, we enacted historic and landmark legislation to cap local property and school taxes and reduce unfunded mandates on local governments.

This bill, if signed into law, would not only undermine the historic reforms we have achieved this session, but would also breach the trust placed in me by the people of this State. Indeed, this legislation would burden local property taxpayers and businesses — both current and future — with up to 15 years of long-term debt without their approval. Instead of cutting spending, this bill would enable school districts to borrow to meet current expenses, forcing taxpayers in the future to repay amounts significantly higher than what was originally borrowed. New York taxpayers and businesses can ill afford these imprudent fiscal practices which will unquestionably result in several more years of unsustainable tax increases.

Ironically, the state itself is irreversibly locked into a similar borrowing gimmick for the foreseeable future, thanks to a law enacted as part of the 2010-11 budget (under Governor Paterson) with the support of state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.  But Cuomo’s veto message strongly implies he will not support such gambits in the future.

Cuomo closes with an allusion to the need for mandate relief:

While I am disapproving this bill today, I am cognizant of the challenges facing local governments and pledge to work closely with localities, including school districts, to reduce costs, relieve the burden on property taxpayers and maintain the highest possible quality of services for all New Yorkers.

Which is nice to hear, although Cuomo and the Legislature so far have failed to deliver on the mandate front.

NYSUT, meanwhile, is not happy.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Do NY families have school choice?

Organizations across New York and the country last week observed to raise awareness of the educational pathways that exist outside of residentially-assigned public school systems. But what does Read More

Another Reason to Lift the Charter Cap

A staff shortage in upstate hospitals prompted , where hospital officials and state lawmakers asked that more funding to train medical professionals be included in January’s state bu Read More

Nation’s Report Card Paints Bleak Picture for New York

Results are in for the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the nation’s report card. They paint a bleak picture for New York. Read More

Don’t Mess with the Tax Cap

The property tax cap has an extraordinary record of restraining tax hikes without unduly straining education budgets. Read More

NY State Public School Enrollment Falls Five Percent Since Covid

New York’s public schools lost almost 60,000 students — 2.38 percent of their total student population —in the past year alone Read More

Emergency Billions Pose Opportunity—and Risk—for NYS Schools

New York schools are to post publicly today plans for spending a huge pile of unexpected and unbudgeted cash. Read More

Report Reveals Albany’s Balanced Budget a Gimmick

Extending the budget window reveals large, yawning budget gaps growing from nearly $8 billion in 2026 to nearly $20 billion by the end of the decade. Read More

On Measuring School Quality, Education Week Misses the Mark

Education Week’s rankings do not measure what counts. New York’s substandard achievement coupled with highest-in-the-nation spending and above-average wealth means that when it comes to school quality, New York fails to pass the mark. Read More