A package of proposed regulations that included a $10.18 fee for filling most drug prescriptions was withdrawn Tuesday by the Department of Financial Services in the face of broad opposition.

The rules would have governed the practices of pharmacy benefit managers or PBMs, companies that process drug claims on behalf of health plans. As proposed, PBMs would have been required to pay pharmacies minimum benchmark prices for drugs plus a “dispensing fee” of $10.18 for each prescription.

The fee alone would have cost the companies billions per year, an expense that was likely to be passed along to health plans, employers and consumers.

The DFS proposals were supported by pharmacies, who contended that PBMs exercise too much market power and pay unfairly low reimbursements to maximize their own profits.

But a range of other stakeholders – including insurers, employers and labor unions – argued the dispensing fee and other regulations would inevitably drive up health-care costs which they are already struggling to afford.

In its comments to the department, the United Federation of Teachers warned that the dispensing fee “will irreparably  harm – and likely bankrupt – union benefit funds.” It estimated the cost to the UFT Welfare Fund at more than $20 million annually.

The New York Health Plan Association called the regulations “profoundly anti-consumer.”

They would increase the cost of pharmacy coverage for employers, union benefit funds, insurers, and individual consumers – many of whom are medically vulnerable or seniors – by an enormous amount that, in the aggregate, would be in the billions of dollars annually. The cost impact of the proposal is not speculative or subject to actuarial debate. It is basic arithmetic that is easily calculated.

The Empire Center submitted comments focused on the dispensing fee, saying the provision would “push up the cost of coverage for New Yorkers, who already pay some of the highest health premiums in the country.”

“Even if other parts of the proposed regulations lead to savings, those savings would be offset if not eliminated by the expense of mandatory dispensing fees,” the center said.

DFS gave no explanation for its decision to withdraw the regulations, which was posted 15 days after the close of the comment period on Oct. 16.

Also on Tuesday, the department announced its final adoption of separate regulations relating to the licensing of PBMs, including the reports they must file and the registration fees they must pay.

The department’s push to regulate PBMs grew out of licensing legislation that was enacted in 2021 and amended in 2022. That law called for the estate to regulate PBM pricing practices generally, but made no specific mention of establishing a dispensing fee – meaning DFS could drop that provision from future regulatory proposals.


About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

Loss of Patients and Revenue Foreshadowed Downsizing for SUNY Downstate

The SUNY-owned hospital in Brooklyn facing a newly announced downsizing plan has seen its patient volume and revenue plunge over the past decade, according to a review of its financial reports. Read More

How a Medicaid Program To Improve Nursing Home Care Ended Up Paying for Union Benefits

New York State's budget-making process sometimes works like a closed loop, as interest groups on the receiving end of state spending reinvest a portion of their proceeds to lobby Albany for still more money. Read More

Despite Lingering Shortages, New York’s Health-Care Workforce Is Bigger Than Ever

The state's health-care workforce is recovering unevenly from the pandemic, with persistently lower employment levels in some areas and robust growth in others. This mixed pattern c Read More

The Wacky Math of New York’s Essential Plan

Thanks to an absurdly wasteful federal law, New York's Essential Plan is expected to continue running billion-dollar surpluses even as state officials more than double its spending over the next several years. Read More

In a Tight Budget Year, New York’s Hospital Lobby Shoots for the Moon

As Governor Hochul calls for spending restraint next year, influential hospital lobbyists are pushing what could be the costliest budget request ever floated in Albany. In a , the G Read More

Putting the Mission in Hochul’s Health Commission

Last week Governor Hochul answered one big question about her Commission on the Future of Health Care – the names of its members – but left a fundamental mystery unresolved:  W Read More