screen-shot-2019-08-28-at-12-53-47-pm-150x150-6614849Governor Andrew Cuomo’s proposal to issue a new generation of motor vehicle license plates carrying a mandatory one-time $25 replacement fee is raising some questions about the background of the law authorizing his action.

Under the plan, announced August 18, drivers “with license plates that are 10-years-old or older will be issued new plates” beginning in April 2020. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) will charge $25 per set of plates, plus $20 for vehicle owners who want to keep their current plate number. The governor’s news release estimated that 3 million vehicle owners will be renewing their registrations in the coming biannual cycle, which would translate into $75 million in additional gross revenues for the state.

Where does the fee come from?

Section 401(3)(a) of the Vehicle & Traffic Law includes this sentence:

An additional fee, not to exceed twenty-five dollars, shall be paid to the commissioner whenever a set of reflectorized number plates is issued for any vehicle for which a registration fee is normally charged except that, with respect to any number plate which is specifically requested by the applicant, such fee shall be paid to the commissioner upon approval of such request. [emphasis added]

The first half of that sentence authorizes a fee of up to $25 for any set of new plates—which clearly means the DMV (which answers to the governor) has discretion to set a lower fee. The second half is the apparent statutory basis for DMV’s added fees for personalized plates (now $60 initially and $31.25 a year thereafter) and the $20 fee to retain a number.

When was the fee enacted?

The $25 maximum fee was authorized in a budget bill passed under Governor David Paterson in 2009.  That language, in turn, amended a prior law authorizing a fee of up to $15, which had been enacted as part of the state budget in 2003, over Governor George Pataki’s veto, by the then-Republican Senate majority and Assembly Democrats. The new plate fee apparently originated—at the minimal level of $1.50 plus cost—among the budget gap-closing revenue raisers adopted 1991 under Governor Mario Cuomo.

Why is the state planning to start requiring new plates in 2020?

State law makes drivers responsible for keeping their license plates “clean and in a condition so as to be easily readable” (VTL 402(1)(b)). Otherwise, the frequency of new plate issues is totally within the discretion of the governor, whose press release said new plates must be phased in over the next 10 years because “many” plates now in use “are damaged, oxidized and peeling, making it difficult or impossible to read the license plate number.”

“Having a license plate that is legible reduces a motorist’s risk of being pulled over and cited for having an illegible license plate,” the press release added. 

Has this been done before?

As further detailed in this Wikipedia entry, New York’s most recent mandatory license plate changeovers came in:

When the new plate fee was created in 1991 and increased in 2003, the state didn’t immediately cash in by changing its license plates; instead, the fee applied only to plates issued for new registrations.

Paterson, by contrast, had initially planned to immediately raise an additional $129 million by requiring all vehicle owners to acquire the new “Empire Gold” generation of plates in 2009-10. In the face of public objections stirred up by Republican lawmakers, he backed off that plan and instead mandated new plates only for new registrations. Some 3 million cars, trucks and other vehicles still carry the white-and-blue 2001 generation of license plates.

Lawmakers concerned about Cuomo’s plate-replacement push have the option to amend the Vehicle and Traffic Law to restrict DMV from charging drivers anything more than the cost of manufacturing plates, which state Sen. James Tedisco (R-Schenectady) estimates at $2.30 per pair.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

State Offers Taxpayer-Funded Health Coverage to Unionized Home Care Workers

In a new subsidy for the health-care union 1199 SEIU, the Hochul administration is allowing the union's benefit fund for home care aides to shift some members into taxpayer-funded health coverage through the Essential Plan. Read More

A Closer Look at $4 Billion in State Capital Grants to Health Providers

The state has awarded $4.3 billion in health-care capital grants over the past decade, with a disproportionate share flowing to upstate providers, Health Department records show. Th Read More

NY’s net taxpayer migration loss dropped a bit in 2021-22, latest IRS data show

The outflow of New York taxpayers to the rest of the country subsided from the previous year's record high during the second tax-filing period following the March 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, according to the latest (IRS). Read More

Hochul’s Pandemic Study Is a $4.3 Million Flop

The newly released study of New York's coronavirus pandemic response falls far short of what Governor Hochul promised – and the state urgently needs – in the aftermath of its worst natural disaster in modern history. Read More

NY’s biggest public pension fund gained nearly 12% in FY 2024

Rebounding from its biggest loss since the Global Financial Crisis, New York's Common Retirement Fund realized a strong investment gain of 11.55 percent in fiscal year 2024, state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli announced. The Fund, which now stands just below $268 billion, supports pensions paid to members of the New York State and Local Retirement System (NYSLRS). Read More

82 Questions Hochul’s Pandemic Report Should Answer

This is the month when New Yorkers are due to finally receive an official report on the state's response to the Covid-19 pandemic, one of the deadliest disasters in state history. T Read More

The Real Lack of Courage Driving NYC Congestion Pricing

Governor Hochul is taking heat after postponing the state’s years-old plan to charge drivers to enter lower Manhattan. As critics slam her for lacking “political courage,” it’s an appropriate time to examine some of the underlying issues that congestion pricing was meant to indirectly mitigate—because many if not most advocates were afraid to touch those issues themselves. And if congestion pricing proponents are to be taken at their word about their concern for MTA finances, or traffic, or air quality, they must show some of the same courage they’ve accused the governor of lacking. Read More

To Encourage Recycling, Pols Move To Trash The Legislature

New York state lawmakers in recent years have surrendered some of their policymaking and taxing powers to the executive branch. With the 2024 legislative session coming to close, they’re poised to go even further and turn those powers over to an organization outside of government entirely. Read More