It’s Christmas in June up in Albany — that time of year when lawmakers hand out taxpayer-funded goodies to friends and political allies.
On Thursday, the Citizens Budget Commission cited six new bills to provide grants, tax breaks or other public subsidies to assorted lucky recipients — in the name of “economic development.”
That brings the total number of such bills now in play to 67. Many won’t become law, but any that do will send yet more taxpayer funds down the drain. How much more? Gee: The bills don’t specify.
Gov. Cuomo, as The Post has reported, pumped a whopping $10 billion into his “Andy Land” economic-development programs through last year, with barely any return on that investment.
Some $15 million went for a “film hub” near Syracuse that sold for $1; $90 million for a lightbulb factory that failed to materialize; $750 million for just one now-struggling Buffalo solar-panel factory that stands little chance of repaying the money, let alone generating the “economic activity” to justify it.
But foolish investing is pretty much the point of the “economic development” game. Consider the one bill on the CBC’s list that has passed both the Assembly and the Senate: It increases the cap on individual grants for Entrepreneurship Assistance Centers from $75,000 to $175,000 — even as it reduces the program’s reporting requirements.
Other bills would provide bonbons of one form or another to manufacturers, small firms, health-care services, etc.
Another batch of gifts comes via the State and Municipal Facilities Program, which borrows money (ostensibly) to help pay for “capital” projects — but is truly a slush fund for local pork.
As the Empire Center’s Ken Girardin reported last week, new SMFP cash “was noticeably missing from the budget bills adopted on April 1, raising the suspicion that a fresh infusion” will be part of the Big Ugly legislation rushed through in the end-of-session crush.
In last year’s SMFP porkfest, $508 million went to 1,207 projects, including $250,000 for an Islip skate park, $250,000 for a cabin in Irondequoit, $300,000 for Hempstead ballfields and $125,000 to resurface a West Haverstraw roller rink.
Even for-profit firms can score: Cuomo steered $3 million via the SMFP to developers of a Staten Island mall, Girardin notes. Funds flowed after the builders gave $85,000 to the gov’s campaign.
None of these handouts serve the broader public, but only the “lucky” winners and the pols who score donations and local bragging rights — at the public’s expense.
Just remember: Every pol is a Santa suit is actually a pickpocket.
© 2019 New York Post
You may also like
‘Nano-fantasy’: Experts weigh in on Marcy Nano
Edmund McMahon, found and research director, the Empire Center, “At the end of the day, you’re still talking about a site that’s remote, to put it kindly. Right now, for all the marketing spin, this still feels more like a nano-fantasy." Read More
Capitol pressroom
Former Assemblyman Richard Brodsky and EJ McMahon, Founder and Research Director of the Empire Center, shared their insights into the effects of the legislation and the political implications. Read More
UNFINISHED BUSINESS AS ALBANY SESSION CLOCK TICKS DOWN
Of the $508 million in pork awarded last year, most of it came from the State and Municipal Facilities program, which is widely derided as legislative slush fund, according to an analysis by the fiscally conservative Empire Center for Public Policy. Read More
Business lobby opposes wage mandate
E.J. McMahon, research director of the Empire Center for Public Policy, estimated that expanding the prevailing-wage mandate in New York to all projects that get public support would boost construction costs significantly.
In an essay published after the legislation was filed, McMahon argued the proposed expansion resembled a “costly protection racket” for New York’s “politically powerful labor cartel.” Read More
Economic inequality continues rising in Capital Region, U.S.
Opponents of a higher minimum wage, like the Empire Center for Public Policy, have argued that a gradual minimum wage increase would increase employer overhead and cost the state up to 200,000 jobs — and at least 11,000 in the Capital Region alone. Read More
Expanding prevailing wage: a help to region’s fortunes, or hindrance?
But an Empire Center for Public Policy study estimated that the state's prevailing wage mandate would drive up the cost of publicly funded projects by at least 20 percent in the Buffalo area, compared to median private-sector construction wages. The study estimated the mandate led to increases of anywhere from 13 percent to 25 percent in the state, depending on the region. Read More
EDITORIAL: Naked politics is driving Albany Democrats
The governor and state Senate would dedicate the revenue for the MTA — but you can bet they’ll count it as their contribution to the agency. (And the Assembly just wants the tax to fund its overall huge boost in statewide spending.) It also means trouble for future MTA budgets, the Empire Center’s E.J. McMahon warns, since real estate tax revenues are highly volatile. Read More
Should New York re-think its economic development approach?
We also reached out to the experts to see what they have to say. In our latest “Ask the Experts” feature, we reached out to Donnie Charleston, diirector of state and local fiscal engagement at the Urban Institute; David Friedfel, director of state studies at the Citizens Budget Commission; Bruce Gyory, a senior advisor at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips and a Democratic political consultant; Jim Heaney, the founder, editor and executive director of Investigative Post; and E.J. McMahon, research director at the Empire Center for Public Policy. Read More