Local union leaders say the Supreme Court’s ruling on Wednesday used the First Amendment as a pretext to advance the longstanding conservative goal of weakening unions.

The 5-4 ruling forbids public-employee contracts from requiring workers to pay union dues.

The Janus ruling could weaken workers’ voices in the face of powerful corporations, said Sparrow Tobin, a board member representing Orange and Rockland counties for New York State United Teachers.

Anti-union forces are “cutting our legs out from under us,” Tobin said. “It’s ironic that unions used to give workers a voice, and (the Supreme Court is) using a First Amendment argument to suppress the voice of workers.”

The Janus decision could significantly sap resources from unions in New York and more than 20 states, according to the Empire Center, a nonpartisan New York think tank.

New York has the nation’s most heavily unionized public sector, with 1.2 million of 1.4 million government employees in unions, according to the Empire Center.

The think tank estimates that all the New York public-sector workers opting out of union membership could cost unions $110 million in revenue. All told, New York’s public-sector unions collect at least $862 million annually in dues and fees, according to the Empire Center.

In a statement, CSEA Southern Region President Billy Riccaldo, who represents the mid-Hudson, said, “Our members have been clear that this case has nothing to do with benefiting them and everything to do with weakening unions, tipping the balance in favor of the employer, and silencing working people.”

Ron Diaz, president of the Hudson Valley Area Labor Federation, said “the Supreme Court ruled in favor of big money” because the plaintiff was backed by the anti-union, conservative donor-funded National Right to Work Committee. Unions typically support Democrats.

A minuscule amount of dues go to political speech, said Anthony Adamo, CSEA SUNY New Paltz Local 610 president. At SUNY New Paltz, for example, that total is just 3 cents per dollar, or roughly $26 per worker annually.

“Do I think (the Janus decision) will weaken the union? No. CSEA is best when the pressure is on,” Adamo said. “Our membership knows what we have, what we’ve gotten, and that now more than ever we need to stick together.”

You may also like

Editorial: Cuomo’s problematic Medicaid maneuvers

“It’s everything that’s wrong with Albany in one ugly deal,” Bill Hammond, a health policy expert at the fiscally conservative Empire Center, told The Times. Read More

MTA, LIRR union relationship worse than ever; up next is collective bargaining

The MTA’s heightened focus on overtime follows an April financial report from the Empire Center for Public Policy that revealed alarmingly high overtime rates among some MTA employees, including former LIRR chief measurement officer Thomas Caputo, who made $344,147 in overtime on top of his base salary of $117,499. Read More

CLOCK TICKING ON MTA OVERTIME GLUT AS UNION SOURS ON GOVERNOR

An April report from the Empire Center for Public Policy highlighted a 16% surge last year in overtime costs at the MTA — where the $418 million payroll cost in 2018 was $82 million more than what the authority expects to take in from the last fare and toll increases. Read More

EDITORIAL: Prevailing wage leads to prevailing waste

Research has found that prevailing wage requirements increase the cost of construction. In New York, a 2017 report released by the Empire Center for Public Policy found that prevailing wage requirements inflated the cost of publicly funded construction projects in the state by 13 to 25 percent. Read More

Post-Janus, battle for dues paying union members heats up

The battle over public-sector union dues in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Janus v. AFSCME decision heated up on Wednesday as the Cuomo Administration and outside groups offered up differing opinions on the importance of membership cards. Read More

Man behind Janus case says public unions will have to sell themselves better after Supreme Court ruling

The Illinois state worker behind a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that public workers cannot be forced to pay union dues said Thursday morning that the unions will be forced to do a better job selling themselves. Read More

Unions fight back after Supreme Court defeat

“The unions had said the loss of agency fees would diminish their political power,” the Empire Center’s Ken Girardin explained. “Reducing their power would put them on a level playing field” with government officials while negotiating, perhaps yielding less-lucrative contracts. Read More

Supreme Court blow to mandatory union dues likely to have big impact in New York

The Supreme Court ruling Wednesday striking down requirements that public-sector employees covered by union contracts pay union fees even if they are not union members could have a dramatic impact in New York. Read More