It’s a pity New York cannot power its economy on hubris, but state officials this week gave it a try.

The “Future Energy Economy Summit” convened in Syracuse by Gov. Hochul brought together many of the same groups and characters who have shaped New York’s current energy policy — and somehow expected something different out of them.

Helming the summit was Richard Kauffman, New York’s “energy czar,” who for almost a decade has played a major role both in setting New York energy policy and working with companies in the energy sector.

Kauffman is hardly unique in this respect: If anything, he’s the embodiment of New York’s energy policy, which for decades has increasingly seen the political class imposing its preferences — sometimes quite suddenly, and sometimes quite lucratively — with little regard for how their whims translated into higher costs or reduced reliability for families and businesses.

Albany turned seemingly on a dime in 2016, going from encouraging the use of natural gas to blockading projects to bring natural gas to New York or New England.

The switch left the Northeast more reliant on older power plants and dirtier fuels while preventing customers from getting cleaner-burning fuel.

State officials soon after bullied Indian Point, a profitable nuclear plant that was generating close to a quarter of downstate’s electricity, to shut down.

Then they pressed ahead with costly plans to build wind turbines off Long Island, allowing the tiny roster of eligible developers to essentially name their price — because the rushed process left few companies able to bid.

These policies pushed up both costs and emissions, but they brought political windfalls: Environmentalists celebrated Indian Point’s closure, and inefficient construction unions cheered when the state effectively banned non-unionized construction firms from working on the offshore projects.

And Hamptonites breathed a sigh of relief as the federal government — at New York’s urging — quietly excluded their viewshed from the areas eligible for offshore wind development.

Albany took things to a more extreme level in 2019 when Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act.

The law went far beyond setting targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing renewable energy generation.

It imposed arbitrary, mandatory levels for solar, offshore wind and energy storage projects — while excluding more reliable hydroelectric and nuclear generation from that same public funding.

Each of these constraints made it more expensive, and less practical, for the state to hit its own greenhouse gas goals.

Albany took some regulatory liberties to make one particular hydroelectric project, the Champlain Hudson Power Express power line from Quebec to New York City, eligible for subsides.

But good luck getting anyone in the Hochul administration to explain why electricity from Canadian hydroelectric dams shouldn’t count as renewable as far south as Yonkers, but magically earns that distinction when the electrons reach The Bronx.

As to nuclear, the summit cracked the door to the possibility that New York might at some point, in some circumstances, allow companies to build new nuclear reactors — something that’s outright illegal on Long Island at present.

Nuclear power’s very consideration, almost as an act of desperation, reflects how badly Albany has micromanaged the state’s energy picture.

Climate activists blame the pandemic for the fact that New York’s emissions have changed little in the recent years, but the state had already set itself up for a mess by focusing more on what the electric grid should look like, and not enough on how it could be allowed to evolve. (Replacing a nuclear power plant with gas turbines didn’t help).

Officials made unrealistic assumptions that interest rates would remain low, making wind and solar projects appear cheaper to finance.

They were indifferent to the federal government’s century-old prohibition on using foreign ships and crews on American projects, which made offshore wind efforts needlessly more expensive.

And now they act surprised when the price tag of backing up those wind and solar projects with battery storage registers north of $1 trillion — for New York alone.

After gorging themselves on upstate Reisling and PowerPoints feting the vision of the state’s political class, those who gathered in Syracuse would do well to ask whether the answers to the state’s energy problems lie in no longer believing that its leaders have any clue to what those answers are.

You may also like

NY’s own researchers warn of state’s off-the-charts school spending

What was expected to be a mundane state-ordered study into how Albany doles out cash to local school districts turns out to be required reading for New York taxpayers — and state lawmakers. Read More

Hochul’s mad Medicaid spending woos health honchos

Perhaps the most damning commentary on Gov. Hochul’s Medicaid spending plan — which made up roughly half of the $252 billion state budget she released Tuesday — was the silence of the attack dogs. Last year, the hospital lobby spent millions on TV ads falsely accusing Hochul of “cutting” the state-run health plan, which covers 7 million lower-income New Yorkers. This year, the ad campaign has gone quiet, a sign she is giving hospitals everything they could want and more. Read More

New York Is a Cautionary Tale on Home Care

Fans of ’s “Medicare at Home” proposal should study up on New York’s bloated home healthcare system, which covers about 850,000 people. Its large scale and rapid growth embody a cent Read More

Hochul bows to health-worker union’s $9B senior-care power play that could bust NY’s budget

Gov. Hochul’s overhaul of the  reached a milestone last week when she named a Georgia-based company as the winning bidder to be the program’s statewide “fiscal intermediary” — and to replace  that currently handle those duties. The  dre Read More

Another Voice: Albany’s MTA congestion pricing battles have implications for Western New York

Gov. Kathy Hochul has taken blistering criticism for postponing congestion pricing, a long-planned $15 toll on drivers entering lower Manhattan meant to reduce traffic — and collect $15 tolls. Most of the drama may be playing out in New York City, but pay attention, upstate: you stand to lose — or win — in this fight. Read More

Another Voice: Money Isn’t the problem for New York schools – the lawmakers are

Anyone wondering how New York consistently has the nation’s highest public school spending but below-average student outcomes got a succinct explanation from Albany earlier this month. Read More

Court’s mail-in voting decision is a slap in the face to NY’s voters

So much for “no means no.” That’s the message from the state Court of Appeals, which ruled last week that New Yorkers don’t need an excuse to cast an absentee ballot by mail when they’re otherwise able to vote in person — even though the voters themselves have directly rejected such a measure. Read More

Hochul’s COVID report is too weak; do it better

A state-ordered study of New York’s pandemic response has finally appeared, and it’s shaping up as a minor disaster of its own. Read More