New York will reap a state budget windfall of at least $3.3 billion in fines paid by the big French bank BNP Paribas after it pleaded guilty recently to violating sanctions against transactions in Cuba, Sudan and Iran.

So, how should the money be spent?

Consider this analogy:

You and your family live in a big old house that needs tens of thousands of dollars in repairs. Your income is pretty good, but you live paycheck-to-paycheck.

After taking out a home-equity loan and maxing out your credit cards to fix the leaky roof and rotten clapboards, you’re still occasionally borrowing more just to pay the guy who cleans out your gutters and plows your driveway.

You learn one day that a distant cousin has died and left you $3,000. It’s not a life-changing sum, but it gets the family excited.

Your teenage son reminds you that upgrading to the premium cable package would allow you to watch more ballgames together. Your spouse and younger kids would love to cool off in a backyard pool. Your brother-in-law wants to reduce the rent he pays for his room above your garage.

Still, you can’t help thinking about how overextended you’ve become to pay for the upkeep on the house — and the work that still needs to be done.

This is essentially the sort of challenge facing Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, whose next budget will recommend how the BNP Paribas cash shall be appropriated by the legislature.

Simply splurging — say, tossing the lump sum at schools or giving it away in tax cuts — would be shortsighted and irresponsible. Once the cash is spent, Cuomo would have to find it somewhere else, and he’s already promised more than he can deliver over the next four years with cutting projected spending.

The right choice is pretty clear.

New York State, like the cash-strapped owner of an old house, has massive ongoing infrastructure needs — and, as it happens, this is a perfect time for a fresh infusion of money to help meet them.

The five-year capital plans for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and state Department of Transportation expire at the end of the fiscal year. The 2016 budget the governor will present in January should show how the state will help fund those programs.

Cuomo should evenly divide the BNP Paribas money between the MTA and the DOT capital plans. The top priority should be to find ways to permanently reduce New York’s reliance on borrowed cash to cover recurring maintenance needs and reconstruction of highways and bridges.

In the MTA’s case, that would mean targeting it to the “state of good repair” budget for the rail and transit system.

In DOT’s case, Cuomo should consider targeting the money to the Consolidated Street and Local Highway and Improvement Program, which supports improvements to local road systems in every corner of the state. The debt service on bonds floated to finance the program now almost equals the total annual expenditures of the program.

This approach would have double-barreled benefits for Long Islanders, who use both the MTA and the roads eligible for CHIPs money.

To be sure, the $3.3 billion in BNP Paribas fine money would represent a small share of the total needed to finance the next MTA and DOT five-year plans, which are likely to total more than $25 billion each.

Nonetheless, making strategic use of this money to support New York’s undernourished capital infrastructure plans would yield the greatest lasting benefits for all New Yorkers.

About the Author

E.J. McMahon

Edmund J. McMahon is Empire Center's founder and a senior fellow.

Read more by E.J. McMahon

You may also like

Cuomo neglects New York’s highways

Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s effort to campaign for re-election as a master builder of new infrastructure has been undermined by headlines about New York City’s crumbling subway system. Meanwhile, much less public and political attention is being paid to his management of another major transportation asset: the New York state highway system. Read More

The new Tappan Zee shows the best—and the worst—of Cuomo

This weekend, just days ahead of a primary that polls say he’ll win handily, Gov. Andrew Cuomo will take the wheel of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s refurbished 1932 Packard for a celebratory drive across the replacement for the old Tappan Zee Bridge. Read More

Project labor agreements increase cost of construction

Gov. Andrew Cuomo has promised — loudly, proudly and publicly — that New York state will overspend on public works projects. Read More

Cuomo’s Rocky Road

In his combined State of the State and budget message last week, Gov. Cuomo officially unveiled $100 billion in “transformative" infrastructure projects — enough to “make Governor [Nelson] Rockefeller jealous.” That wouldn’t be easy, even if it were desirable. To finance a 15-year building binge that included most of the State University system — not to mention countless other capital projects capped by Albany’s monstrously modernist Empire State Plaza — New York’s legendary Republican governor from 1959 to 1973 quintupled state debt. Cuomo clearly hopes his plans will be perceived as Rockefeller-esque in scope. So how does he plan to pay for it all? The answer: for the most part, he doesn’t. Read More

How NY wastes millions on state construction

Gov. Cuomo’s 2017 state budget, which he’ll present next week, is likely to call for billions of dollars in new spending on highways and bridges. Unfortunately, taxpayers won’t get their money’s worth if the state continues to insist on rigging bids for public-works projects that all but guarantee the jobs will go to unions. Read More

New York lawmakers’ three big blown chances

The Legislature is on the verge of following Governor Cuomo's lead by making three big moves in the wrong direction. Read More

Albany’s ‘windfall’ feeding frenzy

Four years ago, as Andrew Cuomo prepared to begin his first term as governor, the biggest problem facing New York state was how to close a $10 billion budget gap. This year, gearing up for his second term, Cuomo faces quite a different challenge: what to do with roughly $5 billion in extra cash. Read More

Invest the windfall in infrastructure

No matter how much the left wants to expand government, no matter how much the right wants to cut taxes, both ought to observe a fundamental rule of government spending: Never use one-shot revenues to fund recurring operating expenses. Read More