Gov. Andrew Cuomo last week effectively promised — loudly, proudly and publicly — that New York state will overspend on public works projects.

“Every project we build is going to be built with organized labor — every project,” the governor told a gathering of construction trade unions in Washington.

Can he actually deliver? The answer, to a great extent, is “yes.”

As a result, New York taxpayers won’t get maximum value for their construction dollars, and thousands of non-union workers will be unfairly shut out of the competition for government contracts to build, overhaul and expand bridges, highways and other critical infrastructure.

Public works contracts generally must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder — but with important added strings attached. The state’s Labor Law gives state agencies and public authorities broad discretion to require bidders to enter into project labor agreements (PLAs), essentially collective bargaining agreements with groups of labor unions.

PLAs typically involve commitments to steer at least 80 percent of jobs to union members, disqualifying contractors whose employees haven’t chosen to join a union. Even in New York, 70 percent of construction workers are not union members. New York’s PLA push actually began with Republican Gov. George Pataki in the late 1990s, but Cuomo has taken it to a new level. In addition to reducing work opportunities for non-union members and their employers, the insistence on PLAs ultimately drives up costs and soaks up more scarce capital resources.

That impact was put on display in 2011, soon after Cuomo took office, when the state Department of Transportation put its thumb on the scale for Hudson Valley labor unions and required a PLA on a reconstruction project of Exit 122 of Route 17 in Orange County — after the bidding process was already under way. As a result, the lowest bid was discarded because it didn’t use a PLA, and the contract was awarded to the second-lowest bidder — whose price tag was $4.5 million (6 percent) higher.

The state fought in court for its right to impose the PLA requirement. After a judge sided with the lowest bidder, the DOT decided to rebid the job entirely, rather than let a non-union company get the work.

State taxpayers ultimately had to pay millions more to cover the costs of the work disruption that resulted from the litigation.

PLA proponents, such as the governor, rationalize mandatory PLAs by saying that the deals save money by negotiating efficiencies and preventing strikes, but both claims are questionable: Years before the Exit 122 incident revealed how much PLAs were driving up roadwork costs, a 2006 study by the Beacon Hill Institute found that school construction costs in New York were 20 percent higher when a project labor agreement was used.

Meanwhile, union carpenters walked off about 30 job sites in and around New York City in July — despite being covered by a PLA that specifically forbade strikes. They only went back to work after a federal judge intervened.

Behind the policy debate lies the basic fact that if PLAs actually delivered reliable cost savings, there’d be no need to require them. After all, contractors looking to win competitive bids already want to keep their costs low.

So why is the governor going to force them to use project labor agreements?

Cuomo made his commitment to steer public-works contracts to union labor just minutes after thanking union representatives for supporting him in previous elections.

“Without the friendship, the support, and the kindness of the people in this room, I don’t believe I would be governor of the state of New York,” Cuomo said. “They’ve had my back every step of the way and I will never forget it.”

New York’s infrastructure needs require stretching every penny of public money to address the crumbling roads, deficient bridges and other assets that need immediate attention. Taxpayers will be better off if the governor sticks to showing his gratitude with cards, not contracts.

About the Author

Ken Girardin

Ken Girardin is the Empire Center’s Policy Analyst, performing detailed analysis of data and public policy in support of the Center’s research work.

Read more by Ken Girardin

You may also like

Washington shouldn’t fund NY’s “normal” budgets

With the coronavirus lockdown continuing to erode tax revenues, Gov. Andrew Cuomo has turned up the volume on his demands for a federal bailout of the New York state budget. In a weekend briefing, the governor repeated his estimate that the Empire State will need help closing a deficit of $10 billion to $15 billion. “I don’t have any funding to do what I normally do,” he said. Read More

Blame Cuomo for New York’s Medicaid crisis

When it comes to New York’s latest Medicaid mess, the buck stops with Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Read More

Busting the cap

The budget crisis in New York’s Medicaid program stems from the failure of a key cost-control measure adopted during Governor Cuomo’s first term. In 2011, Cuomo and the Legislature imposed a “global cap” on state Medicaid spending that was tied to the medical inflation rate. The measure showed signs of working at first, but lost its effectiveness as circumstances changed, loopholes multiplied and compliance faltered. Read More

Cuomo’s Plate Spinning

Governor Cuomo’s license plate design contest was a PR ploy masking a nickel-and-dime revenue raiser. Read More

Cuomo’s incredible wind-power pander

New York's offshore wind project will demand massive subsidies—ultimately billed to ratepayers. Read More

How Cuomo is cooking New York’s books

When lawmakers in Albany passed the state budget last spring, Gov. Andrew Cuomo declared it “both timely and fiscally responsible.” Timely was true enough. But fiscally responsible? Not so much. Read More

Green Monster Could Eat NY

Gov. Andrew Cuomo said he wanted New York to adopt a limit on greenhouse gas emissions that’s “the most aggressive goal in the country.” Unfortunately for New Yorkers, state lawmakers took him at his word. The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act now awaiting his signature vastly expands the state’s power to regulate every corner of New York’s economy in pursuit of lower emissions. Yet sponsors didn’t even bother to estimate its fiscal and economic impacts before rushing it through. Read More

Cuomo’s SALT Flop

By midnight Monday, more than 9 million New Yorkers will have filed their income tax returns for 2018. And most will then have cause to wonder what the Great New York SALT Panic of 2018 was all about. Read More

Subscribe

Sign up to receive updates about Empire Center research, news and events in your email.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Empire Center for Public Policy
30 South Pearl St.
Suite 1210
Albany, NY 12207

Phone: 518-434-3100
Fax: 518-434-3130
E-Mail: info@empirecenter.org

About

The Empire Center is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank located in Albany, New York. Our mission is to make New York a better place to live and work by promoting public policy reforms grounded in free-market principles, personal responsibility, and the ideals of effective and accountable government.