packs-of-pills-300x200-7836006Thursday’s budget hearing raised an eye-opening fact about the impact of increasing pharmaceutical prices on New York’s Medicaid program: Rebates reduce the state’s bottom-line cost by almost half.

Manufacturer rebates – some mandated by federal law, others negotiated by the state – currently average about 45 percent of the program’s gross drug costs, state Medicaid director Jason Helgerson testified.

Despite the size of the rebates, officials commonly use pre-rebate figures when discussing drug spending, which exaggerates the impact of price hikes.

Governor Cuomo’s budget briefing book, for example, said Medicaid’s “gross prescription drug costs have grown by $1.7 billion or approximately 38 percent over the last three years.”

This was referring to pre-rebate outlays of $6.2 billion in fiscal year 2015-16, up from $4.5 billion in 2013-14.

However, rebates would have reduced the net increase to about $940 million. And since the federal government picks up half the cost of New York’s Medicaid program, the state’s share of the growth over three years would have been roughly $470 million.

That’s nothing to sneeze at, but far less than the impact of the governor’s minimum wage increase – which is projected to add $838 million to the state’s Medicaid costs, or $1.7 billion to state-federal Medicaid spending, over the next three years.

Under questioning by lawmakers, Helgerson and Health Commissioner Howard Zucker also confirmed that price increases for existing drugs – such as the controversial hikes for EpiPens used to control allergic reactions – have little impact on Medicaid. This is because federal Medicaid law requires manufacturers to rebate the amount of any hike that exceeds the inflation rate.

However, that rule does not protect Medicaid from new products that start out with high prices, such as hepatitis C drugs that can cost tens of thousands of dollars for a course of treatment.

This is not to say that rising pharmaceutical costs are not a significant concern, especially for commercial insurers. Health plans say prescription drugs are the fastest-growing component of their medical claims. And Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo testified Thursday that drug costs, net of rebates, now account for 25 percent of health premiums regulated by her agency, compared to 18 percent for inpatient hospital care.

In January, Cuomo proposed a four-part plan to control drug costs:

  • For certain high-priced drugs, the Department of Health would be empowered to collect detailed financial information from the manufacturer and establish a “benchmark price.”
  • For drugs sold to Medicaid, manufacturers would have to rebate any amount above the benchmark.
  • For drugs sold to commercial insurers, the state would impose a 60 percent tax on any amount above the benchmark, then distribute the money to health plans to offset premiums.
  • The state would also regulate pharmacy benefit managers, which buy drugs on behalf of health plans and play an increasingly powerful but sometimes murky role in negotiating discounts and rebates.

The plan faces potentially stiff opposition from the pharmaceutical industry, which argues that the proposed price controls would squelch innovation and run afoul of federal law.

Cuomo’s proposal is analyzed in more detail here.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

One of New York’s Biggest Medicaid Contractors Is Quietly Acquiring a Competitor

Author's note: This post has been updated to correct an error in the second paragraph. As state lawmakers debate the future of Medicaid home care, one of the program's bigg Read More

The Union Gave Them the Wrong Data. The Pols Cited It Anyway.

The episode shows the extent to which New York elected officials fail to question the state’s public employee unions—or look at data themselves. Read More

New York’s Home Health Workforce Jumped by 12 Percent in One Year

New York's home health workforce has continued its pattern of extraordinary growth, increasing by 62,000 jobs or 12 percent in a single year, according to newly released data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More