

That’s the question the New York Times asks today in its online “Room for Debate” series. I’m up there with a contribution (answer: “maybe”). Harvard’s Jack Donahue puts the right answer most succinctly:
Some things government should do itself. Some things it should outsource. The rules for smart contracting aren’t mysterious. Tasks that are well-defined, easy to monitor and available from competitive suppliers — call them “commodity tasks” — are prime candidates for privatization. Tasks that are complex and mutable, lack clear benchmarks or are immune from competition — “custom tasks” — should be kept in-house.
Alas, as Donahue notes, states and cities consistently privatize the stuff they shouldn’t, and don’t privatize the stuff they should.
This outcome is not much of a surprise. Private-sector privatization proponents seek out opportunities for out-sized profits (hey, who doesn’t?), and it’s easier to make such profits where there are few competitors and where nobody’s watching because watching is hard.
Read the whole debate!
You may also like

How Washington’s Budget Bill Will Affect Health Care in New York

Albany’s Looming Energy Shock

New York’s K-12 Problem

Two Dozen School Districts Are Returning to the Polls for Budget Revotes

Sponsors of a $10 Fee for Prescriptions Narrow Their Proposal

Even With Federal Cuts, New York’s Health Funding Would Remain High

As Albany’s Session Ends, Watch for Rising Health Costs

Empire Center Launches K-12 SOS on Education Achievement and Spending in New York
Albany’s Looming Energy Shock
- June 23, 2025
New York’s K-12 Problem
- June 17, 2025