

That’s the question the New York Times asks today in its online “Room for Debate” series. I’m up there with a contribution (answer: “maybe”). Harvard’s Jack Donahue puts the right answer most succinctly:
Some things government should do itself. Some things it should outsource. The rules for smart contracting aren’t mysterious. Tasks that are well-defined, easy to monitor and available from competitive suppliers — call them “commodity tasks” — are prime candidates for privatization. Tasks that are complex and mutable, lack clear benchmarks or are immune from competition — “custom tasks” — should be kept in-house.
Alas, as Donahue notes, states and cities consistently privatize the stuff they shouldn’t, and don’t privatize the stuff they should.
This outcome is not much of a surprise. Private-sector privatization proponents seek out opportunities for out-sized profits (hey, who doesn’t?), and it’s easier to make such profits where there are few competitors and where nobody’s watching because watching is hard.
Read the whole debate!
You may also like

What’s Keeping the Heat On?

Ten Reasons the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act May Cost More than It’s Worth

First fiscal overview of Hochul’s second budget

DiNapoli aims to curb NY’s borrowing binge

Summary of Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act’s Scoping Plan

All Fired Up Over Gas Stoves

Do NY families have school choice?

Emails show Cuomo’s staff working on his memoir at the peak of New York’s pandemic
What’s Keeping the Heat On?
- February 4, 2023
First fiscal overview of Hochul’s second budget
- February 1, 2023
DiNapoli aims to curb NY’s borrowing binge
- January 31, 2023
All Fired Up Over Gas Stoves
- January 30, 2023
Do NY families have school choice?
- January 27, 2023