20081121_metopera_560x3751-9699178
nymag.com graphic

The Daily News ran a weird op-ed today by two Competitive Enterprise Institute scholars, F. Vincent Vernuccio and Adam Michel. In the piece, the authors assert that “all around the nation, orchestras … are going silent, crushed by inflexible union contracts that … limit managers’ ability to make decisions.”

Here’s the example with which the authors lead:

Take the case of the beleaguered New York City Opera, whose financial woes have led to a recent announcement that it would be forced to take unpopular austerity measures. In an effort to keep the music alive, City Opera aims to find a cheaper space than the David H. Koch Theater, where it pays $4.5 million a year, and reduce its 48-member staff.

That’s the kind of union intransigence that has threatened school reform ….

Not so fast. Last month, Local 802 of the American Federation of Musicians and the American Guild of Musical Artists issued a symbolic vote of no confidence in City Opera’s director, George Steel.

Guild Executive Director Alan Gordon went so far as to say he would rather not have a City Opera than give in to the cuts. “In that form, City Opera doesn’t deserve to exist, and if you can’t run City Opera as the people’s opera, then someone who can should take over,” he told The New York Times.

So when the City Opera this month announced a new schedule that would allow it to keep performing around the city, the union responded with protests and litigation. It has gone so far as to ask state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to keep the City Opera from moving, alleging that it “has breached its fiduciary duty.”

Um, no.

Sure, it’s probably true that the City Opera unions have done something bad, sometime, contributing to the opera’s woes (although it’s not in the article).

But anyone who has been following this local story knows that blame for the opera’s current “beleaguered” status lies squarely with the opera’s management and board.

City Opera is homeless and almost schedule-less now because four years ago, its board hired a parody of a parody of a European to rake in the big bucks to spice things up.

Gerard Mortier closed the opera for a year to do a massive renovation, meaning that the company lost operating revenue and took on the risk that subscribers would find something else to do.

Mortier also needed to massively ramp up the operating budget for his fancy-artiste productions, in contrast to City Opera’s old business model, which was fewer-frills standbys like Don Giovanni. That meant using long-term endowment funds until the bucks started to roll in.

What happened? Mortier couldn’t raise the money for his vision, and, well, he quit in a huff. Whose fault was that?

Not Mortier’s (for thinking, also, that he could run City Opera largely from Paris). It was the donors’ fault, of course. As Mortier said to the Times:

But it was a miscalculation to think that when I came, there would suddenly be enormous fund-raising. … People in New York don’t know my name, they don’t know me. I don’t know if that’s my fault or their fault. I think it’s their fault. I don’t want to be pretentious, but in some things I know what I am worth. But you know, that’s New York. It’s a world city, and at the same time it’s provincial.

So now the opera, to save face with the little money it has left, is going to put on a traveling show of sorts in cheaper venues throughout the city.

Is this a good idea? Not really. New York’s traditional — provincial, I guess — opera lovers are accustomed to going to Lincoln Center.

Where does the union fit in to all this?

As Vernuccio and Michel note, it voted no confidence in current management. In that, most of the old City Opera’s fans are probably in agreement.

And, as the authors also note, the union has filed a complaint with state AG Eric Schneiderman, noting that two major donors to the opera had intended for their money to support operations at Lincoln Center and nowhere else.

Indeed, the donors’ direction was that their money was “exclusively for the benefit of the constituent companies of Lincoln Center,” they said in their certificate of incorporation decades ago.

Donor intent is important — and it seems that there’s at least a reasonable question here.

To recap: barring some new extra-textual revelation, this debacle is management’s fault, not the union’s fault. It’s an important distinction.

In the public sector, too, state and local woes are management’s fault, not unions’ fault. In many cases — though not, apparently, this one — management woes have to do with union power, but in those cases, too, it is the fault of management for giving unions too much power in the first place.

You may also like

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

Unions are pressing bogus arguments for blowing up NY’s public pension debts

New York's public employee unions are arguing, without evidence, that state lawmakers need to retroactively sweeten the pensions of workers who have been on the job for more than a decade. In fact, state and federal data show why state lawmakers shouldn't. Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

New Jersey’s Pandemic Report Shines Harsh Light on a New York Scandal

A recently published independent review of New Jersey's pandemic response holds lessons for New York on at least two levels. First, it marked the only serious attempt by any state t Read More

Senate, Assembly Budget Plans Include $4B Pension Giveaway

A little-noticed provision in lawmakers’ budget proposals would also be the most costly: their proposal to change state retirement rules would slam New York taxpayers with more than $4 billion in new debt, and immediately drive up pension costs, by retroactively sweetening the pension benefits of public employees. Read More

Past Due: It’s Time to Float New York’s Statutory Interest Rates

Adopting a more neutral statutory interest rate—like the rate under federal law—would address a distorting factor in the cost-benefit analysis of pursuing a meritorious appeal in the Empire State. Read More

Four years later, New York’s COVID hangover lingers

Just in time for the pandemic's fourth anniversary, the state's latest monthly jobs data offer fresh evidence of the lingering economic damage wrought by New York's heavy-handed response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Read More

NYS Seeks Spin Doctor To Fight Climate Law Critics

New York state energy officials are taking the exceptional step of hiring a public relations outfit, using $500,000 per year of public money, to "maintain a positive narrative" and “respond to negative viewpoints” about the state’s 2019 climate law. Read More