Avi Schick, head of the Empire State Development Corp. for 2007 and 2008, has a bad idea in today’s Daily News. He wants to use our taxpayer-guaranteed state and city pension funds to prop up the teetering local construction and commercial-real estate industries. “How would this … work?” Schick asks.

Answer: it wouldn’t, and it would likely exacerbate our commercial real-estate problems while imperiling pension funds and thus tax dollars.

“New York should create its own fund to provide financing to critical real estate and development projects across the state,” Schick writes, saying that “office and residential buildings, warehouses and distribution centers can’t be financed, and those that need to be refinanced have nowhere to turn and will be in danger of default.”

Schick suggests state comptroller Tom DiNapoli and his city counterpart, William Thompson, create such a fund to “finance commercial real estate” with $2 billion in state and city pension money, to be matched by union pension funds and bank funding.

Schick thinks that this public money and the initial bank money could raise at least $5 billion in total. Further, he thinks that the money could attract additional Federal Reserve and other federal government money through the Fed’s new consumer- and commercial-lending bailout program.

O, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive, with bad government structured finance on top of bad private-sector structured finance.

It’s hard to know where to start with what’s wrong with this idea.

First, commercial real-estate construction in New York has stopped for a good reason: there’s a glut of existing, empty real estate, and the glut is growing.

“Building values are dropping as unemployment worsens, offices empty, rents decline, credit remains tight and buyers expect higher rewards for taking on more risk,” the Times reported last week on the New York City market. As rents have fallen nearly 16 percent in less than a year, and as the vacancy rate has risen from frictional levels to double digits, office building values have fallen off a third or more.

And the real risk is future uncertainty, not just for the next couple of years as the financing market remains unsettled, to say the least, but for the indefinite future.

For the past few years, the Manhattan market has thrived on hedge funds, banks, finance-related law firms, and the like paying ever-higher dollars for premium space.

But as we’ve said repeatedly, Wall Street simply may not come back in anything close to its super-profitable bubble-era form. Yes,

New York, provided it keeps up public safety and the like, can attract new businesses to replace Wall Street — but they may not have the same level of cash. Rents and thus asset values may be permanently lower.

Second, 2006-era valuations were wildly speculative even based on a Panglossian scenario of ever-rising rental prices.

Think of 450 Park selling for $1,600 a square foot in early 2007, as the Times cites, when $1,000 a square foot had seemed outlandish just 18 months before. Even less outlandish valuations will suffer: the average class-A midtown building may be worth $350 a square foot today, down as much as 40 percent from 18 months ago, one of the Times’s sources estimates.

These lower valuations aren’t the problem; the higher ones were.

The commercial market simply needs to wring itself of its speculative excesses– very painfully. And the virtue of that workout is that unlike with overvalued houses, people won’t be evicted from their houses as part of that workout.

Owners and developers must adjust to sharply lower prices in the future. And banks who lent money against unrealistic valuations must take their losses, which are now the federal government’s direct fiscal responsibility, certainly not New York City’s.

Anything that New York City and State do to retard this process will delay the industry’s recovery. Moreover, anything that the city and state do to prop up commercial rent prices is bad for the rest of the city’s economy, as well. Too-high commercial rents are good only for owners. They are bad for non-Wall Street tenants, and thus for the city’s attempt to diversify itself away from a financial industry that has imploded.

All of Schick’s talk about attracting private dollars with public dollars is worrisome, too.

In the new world of “public private” financial partnerships, this idea means that the public sector likely would take on the risk. Otherwise, a terrified private sector would never step in (for good reason).

The state and city pension funds — and taxpayers — therefore would face a risk of significant losses as the market forces simply overwhelm the government’s relatively paltry amount of cash.

Ironically, if Schick and his predecessors at ESDC had done a good job at their last job — overseeing reconstruction at the World Trade Center site — they’d have alleviated a bit of this crisis. Developer Larry Silverstein could have easily got private financing to rebuild that site three years ago, or four years ago — but not today.

Ground Zero is the only city site where it’s even possible to argue with a straight face that the city and state governments should directly support reconstruction — because it’s a matter of rebuilding a neighborhood that terrorists destroyed.

But even here, as state and city resources become more finite, more public subsidies for Ground Zero become a matter of debate.

The cold, hard fact is that the city needs working subways more than it needs more real estate right now.

You may also like

State Offers Taxpayer-Funded Health Coverage to Unionized Home Care Workers

In a new subsidy for the health-care union 1199 SEIU, the Hochul administration is allowing the union's benefit fund for home care aides to shift some members into taxpayer-funded health coverage through the Essential Plan. Read More

A Closer Look at $4 Billion in State Capital Grants to Health Providers

The state has awarded $4.3 billion in health-care capital grants over the past decade, with a disproportionate share flowing to upstate providers, Health Department records show. Th Read More

NY’s net taxpayer migration loss dropped a bit in 2021-22, latest IRS data show

The outflow of New York taxpayers to the rest of the country subsided from the previous year's record high during the second tax-filing period following the March 2020 COVID-19 outbreak, according to the latest (IRS). Read More

Hochul’s Pandemic Study Is a $4.3 Million Flop

The newly released study of New York's coronavirus pandemic response falls far short of what Governor Hochul promised – and the state urgently needs – in the aftermath of its worst natural disaster in modern history. Read More

NY’s biggest public pension fund gained nearly 12% in FY 2024

Rebounding from its biggest loss since the Global Financial Crisis, New York's Common Retirement Fund realized a strong investment gain of 11.55 percent in fiscal year 2024, state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli announced. The Fund, which now stands just below $268 billion, supports pensions paid to members of the New York State and Local Retirement System (NYSLRS). Read More

82 Questions Hochul’s Pandemic Report Should Answer

This is the month when New Yorkers are due to finally receive an official report on the state's response to the Covid-19 pandemic, one of the deadliest disasters in state history. T Read More

The Real Lack of Courage Driving NYC Congestion Pricing

Governor Hochul is taking heat after postponing the state’s years-old plan to charge drivers to enter lower Manhattan. As critics slam her for lacking “political courage,” it’s an appropriate time to examine some of the underlying issues that congestion pricing was meant to indirectly mitigate—because many if not most advocates were afraid to touch those issues themselves. And if congestion pricing proponents are to be taken at their word about their concern for MTA finances, or traffic, or air quality, they must show some of the same courage they’ve accused the governor of lacking. Read More

To Encourage Recycling, Pols Move To Trash The Legislature

New York state lawmakers in recent years have surrendered some of their policymaking and taxing powers to the executive branch. With the 2024 legislative session coming to close, they’re poised to go even further and turn those powers over to an organization outside of government entirely. Read More