Today’s Post describes a public-private real-estate deal that perfectly encapsulates New York’s housing policy. David Seifman writes that the city will lavish nearly $3 million on a Brooklyn developer, Tali Realty LLC, to turn the company’s failed condo project into “affordable” housing.

The Post says the 46 tenants who will move in are “lucky” — but it’s really the developer (and the company that financed it) that is lucky.

If the city didn’t step in with its bailout, the financiers would have to foreclose on the unfinished project, take losses, and re-sell the property at a lower price, allowing some other developer to come along starting at a lower cost base, finish the project cheaper, and sell the units at lower prices to clear a profit for itself and help the lenders limit their losses.

Instead, the initial developer and lender get taxpayer money to do what they would have done anyway — sell units at lower prices in a down market. As the press release notes, to accept the financing, the developer only has to rent the units to single people earning $55,500 or families earning $79,200 — the same people who could have afforded cheaper Brooklyn units anyway.

The new $20 million program that financed this pilot deal is a special project of City Council Speaker Christine Quinn (and, apparently, if belatedly, Comptroller John Liu, who got his name in the release). The Post reports that “developers are clamoring to join the program.”

Gee — no wonder. I would like a city subsidy to do what market forces would have already forced me to do anyway, too. This isn’t housing policy — this is taxpayer transfer to the real-estate and financial industries disguised as affordable-housing advocacy.

[I wrote about this program in the Post here, nearly two years ago, and here and here for the old FW blog, before Quinn announced any completed deals. One should be grateful that though the city does bad things with other people’s $$$, it does them slowly and inefficiently.

And, also housing-relatedly, I wrote about rent regulation today here.]

You may also like

How a Medicaid Program To Improve Nursing Home Care Ended Up Paying for Union Benefits

New York State's budget-making process sometimes works like a closed loop, as interest groups on the receiving end of state spending reinvest a portion of their proceeds to lobby Albany for still more money. Read More

Turning NY’s Yellow Buses Green Could Cost $8B+

New York in 2022 imposed the largest unfunded mandate on schools in a generation, requiring them to replace their buses with electric models. New price data indicate the cost is still rising. Read More

The Election Day After Tomorrow

New York’s “cap and invest” program (NYCI), a central part of the state’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, appears designed to hold back much of the program’s sticker-shock until January 2027—after the 2026 election. Read More

How Eliminating the Medicaid ‘Gap’ Would Perpetuate Inequity in Hospital Funding

A change in Medicaid reimbursement currently being pushed by New York's hospital industry appears likely to benefit high-end hospitals proportionally more than safety-net institutions, a review of hospitals' financial repor Read More

Union Membership Dropping in NY Too

The decline in union membership observed nationally appears to be occurring in New York as well. Read More

Hochul’s ‘Straight Talk’ on Medicaid Isn’t Straight Enough

Arguably the biggest Medicaid news in Governor Hochul's budget presentation was about the current fiscal year, not the next one: The state-run health plan is running substantially over budget. Read More

NY private employment was flat at end of 2023

New York's post-pandemic employment recovery stalled in the final quarter of 2023, with the state ending the year still 76,400 private jobs below its February 2020 level. Read More

Construction Unions Beg To Get Into SUNY

Weeks after state university officials warned about looming deficits, state legislators and construction unions are pushing to make SUNY’s financial picture worse. Read More