Writing in today’s FT, investment-banking veteran (and former New York bailout-facilitator) Felix Rohatyn and ESC consulting-firm president Everett Ehlrich, pointing out that states still face $200 billion in operating deficits in the next three years, suggest a repeat of February’s economic stimulus.

Rohatyn and Ehlrich state that “the problem is not state profligacy but … a collapse in income tax revenues driven by cyclical economic conditions, for one, and the collapse of capital gains tax realisations.”

They suggest that Congress expand the February stimulus by $100 billion solely to “plug the states’ fiscal hole,” with “one-third to go directly to our largest localities.”

The team’s diagnosis is not quite correct, however.

In the states that face the biggest deficits, including New York and California, the main problem is that for years, unsustainable growth in tax revenues, much of it from the financial and real-estate sectors, fed unsustainable growth in operating spending, which far outpaced inflation.

The tax revenues have evaporated, yet the spending base remains.

This is an old story in New York and California.

In New York, the nation’s very largest locality — New York City — was happy to let spending keep pace with record tax revenues between 2003 and 2007. In the past eight years, city spending has outpaced inflation more than two-fold; adjusted for both inflation and population, it now surpasses Lindsay-era heights.

But even the traditionally low-tax, low-spending states that were home to the biggest real-estate bubbles ramped up their outlays during the boom years. They were flush with sales-tax revenues from tourists who had some money to spare after forking over their income taxes to California and New York.

To wit: Between 2000 and 2008, spending in Arizona grew by 41 percent after inflation, outpacing population growth by 12 percentage points.

In Nevada, spending grew by 70 percent, outpacing population growth by 40 percentage points.

Florida managed to keep general spending growth roughly in line with population, but only by using its state-guaranteed property-insurance program to subsidize torrid real-estate development in natural-disaster-prone areas, creating a huge, unfunded liability for the future.

Any new stimulus to plug state budget gaps would be dubious, because all it does is allow states (and cities) to maintain too-high spending levels that crowd out private-sector activity; New York has been sending its private-sector growth across its borders for years.

Further, if the next batch of state stimulus, like the last, mostly goes toward education and healthcare, it also would exacerbate existing imbalances that hurt the private sector, which badly needs better physical infrastructure rather than yet more spending in areas where the next dollar spent doesn’t equal a dollar’s worth of improvement.

Any suggestion for new stimulus money shouldn’t come unaccompanied by a strong suggestion that such stimulus come with real strings attached. The conditions for the money should be measurable, concrete, and permanent actions from state legislatures and local governments to rein in out-of-control pension, healthcare and other costs, the real culprits of many of the deficits.

In New York and California, such reform should also include efforts to make tax revenues less prone to severe swings, including lessening dependence on wealthy taxpayers’ highly volatile income.

California has at least made noise about such efforts; New York has not.

You may also like

New York’s K-12 Problem

New York has an education problem that no one really likes to talk about: it spends more than any other state or country in the world yet achieves mediocre results at best. This might come as a surprise, especially since some politicians and pundits tout Read More

Two Dozen School Districts Are Returning to the Polls for Budget Revotes

Voters in 24 New York school districts return to the polls on Tuesday for school budget revotes. Last month, voters in 96 percent of school districts outside New York City conducting votes approved their school budgets for the upcoming year. The 683 sc Read More

Sponsors of a $10 Fee for Prescriptions Narrow Their Proposal

UPDATE: The bill discussed in this post passed the Senate at around 3:30 a.m. Friday by a vote of 57-2. Legislation that would mandate a $10 "dispensing fee" for filling pr Read More

Even With Federal Cuts, New York’s Health Funding Would Remain High

New York's health-care industry stands to lose billions of dollars in federal funding under the major budget bill being debated in Washington – a rare and jarring turn of events for a sector accustomed to steadily increas Read More

As Albany’s Session Ends, Watch for Rising Health Costs

Every session of the state Legislature brings a fresh crop of proposals that would drive up health-care costs, and 2025 is no exception. Here is a sampling of pending bills that, if Read More

Empire Center Launches K-12 SOS on Education Achievement and Spending in New York

In 2022-23 New York used to spend more than any other state or country – $30,000 per student. Next school year the spending might increase to $35,000 per student. Even at $30,000 New York spends twice as much as the US average, and about a third more Read More

House Budget Would Burst New York’s Essential Plan Bubble

The extraordinary cash bonanza associated with New York's Essential Plan – which has generated billions more than state officials were able to spend – would come to a crashing end under the budget bill advancing in Cong Read More

The House GOP’s Shrinking Budget Plan Could Still Cost New York Billions

The likely impact of federal health-care cutbacks has diminished in recent days as House Republican leaders backed away from some of their bigger-ticket proposals, reducing the estimated savings to $625 billion from previous figures of $715 billion and $8 Read More