Mayor Bill de Blasio’s 9-year contract agreement with the United Federation of Teachers, including a pair of 4 percent base-salary increases retroactive to the fall of 2008, will cost so much that he wants to defer some of the expense all the way out to the end of the decade.
Assuming it leads to a similar deal with other city unions, the UFT contract — including a last retro installment in 2020, two years after the pact expires — could boost the city’s cumulative projected budget gaps to $7.6 billion by 2018.
Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg was right: Having depleted past surpluses, the city simply couldn’t afford UFT’s demands for billions in retroactive pay.
But the teachers’ expectations didn’t arise in a vacuum. In fact, it was Bloomberg who unwisely stoked them in the first place.
Those 4 percent pay increases for the 2008-10 contract cycle can be traced back to Bloomberg’s deal with Local 237 of the Teamsters union — announced on Sept. 16, 2008. As he made clear that day, the mayor intended the Teamsters contract with those increases to set the pattern for all other union pacts due to expire in the following months.
But Sept. 16, 2008, wasn’t a typical late-summer day in New York. Just 24 hours earlier, Lehman Brothers had gone bankrupt, accelerating a full-blown panic on Wall Street. While the city’s negotiations with the Teamsters had been going on for months, the financial meltdown should have brought an immediate halt to business as usual.
Despite the very real risk of a prolonged deflationary depression, Bloomberg — planning a third-term race in 2009 — put labor peace and predictability over fiscal prudence.
The UFT, feuding with the mayor on a variety of issues, was the only municipal union to reject two 4 percent raises during the 2008-10 contract cycle. In June 2010, Bloomberg withdrew his offer to the teachers, announcing he would spend the money to prevent UFT layoffs instead.
The budget surpluses accumulated by Bloomberg in good years are the only reason de Blasio can even pretend now that the UFT deal is affordable. But if the teacher contract helps break the budget in the future, Bloomberg will also deserve a good share of the blame.
About the Author
You may also like
Want to Save the Planet? Where’s Your Union Card?
New York state officials this week took their most serious step yet to limit the state’s greenhouse-gas emissions. But they also showed they are more serious about taking care of one of the Read More
Nassau should post labor contracts on its website so taxpayers aren’t left in the dark
Nassau County taxpayers face what could be a $109 million bill. When will they be allowed to see the details? Read More
Big Labor’s next target: Grad schools
Christakis remarked on the website that graduate students, now moving to unionize at the school, are not ordinary worker. Read More
NYC’s finances look flush — but Eric Adams’ budget carries many real risks
A few months into its third fiscal year since the pandemic’s start, New York City’s finances have never looked so flush — and so precarious. Read More
And Now the Union Would Like a Word in Private
The onboarding process has become a key battleground for the country’s government unions. Read More
State senators to get a harsh reality check as their own workers unionize
Labor leaders were giddy when a group of state Senate employees last month announced their intent to unionize. Read More
Albany’s latest gift to the teachers union will shackle NYC schools — and their budgets
The Legislature last week put a new spin on the debate over “mayoral control” of New York City’s schools by shackling the Big Apple with a costly class-size mandate. Read More
Hochul’s first budget rewards unions at taxpayers’ expense — and sets the state on the road to insolvency
New Yorkers are aghast that the Buffalo Bills stadium deal, which will fill the pockets of a wealthy NFL team owner with their tax dollars, is in the state budget the Legislature just adopted. Read More