schumer-8047384Sen. Chuck Schumer raised the alarm Tuesday about a pending reduction in Medicaid funding for safety-net hospitals, which he said would have “devastating” effects in New York.

“I will not accept any proposal that hurts upstate New Yorkers’ access to health care, and will fight tooth and nail to make sure these cuts are stopped,” Schumer said during a press conference at Lewis County General Hospital in Lowville.

His warning was misleading in several ways, not least because it left out an important bit of context: Schumer himself voted for the cuts he was deploring. In effect, he was taking credit for trying to clean up a mess he had helped to create.

The reductions at issue – affecting Medicaid’s Disproportionate Share Hospital program – began as part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, aka Obamacare. DSH is meant in part to compensate hospitals for providing free or discounted care to uninsured patients, a need that was expected to diminish as the ACA took effect.

Schumer supported that law, along with most other Democrats in Congress at the time.

Six times since then, Congress has passed budget bills that postponed the DSH cuts while leaving them on the books and making them deeper and longer-lasting. Five of those measures were signed by President Obama, and the most recent, in 2018, was approved by President Trump.

Schumer voted “yea” on all six of those bills.

The net result of these messy bipartisan actions is that federal DSH funding is officially scheduled to drop by $4 billion, or 29 percent, in federal fiscal year 2020, which starts Oct. 1. 

Under the worst-case scenario – assuming Congress does not delay the cuts for seventh time – New York’s hospitals would collectively lose $650 million in federal aid for the first year, rising to $1.3 billion in 2021. 

But it’s quite possible – even likely – that lawmakers will eventually delay them yet again.

“Threatening hospitals with such a substantial cut is fundamentally wrong,” Schumer said, failing to mention his own role in creating the situation. “However, I have stopped these scheduled cuts before, and am now vowing to again.”

Tuesday’s event was confusing enough that some media outlets mistakenly attributed the pending cuts to the Trump administration – when in fact they are really a holdover from the Obama years.

Schumer’s statement distorted reality on other points as well.

He said New York’s North Country “would be particularly damaged by the DSH cuts.” In fact, the bulk of the funding flows to hospitals in New York City and its surrounding suburbs, where low-income and uninsured patients are concentrated.

He cited estimates of how much various hospitals would lose over the next 10 years – including $6.2 million for Lewis County General – without noting that DSH, under current law, would revert to its current funding level after five years.

He said “no state stands to lose more funding than New York” – but that’s because state allotments have been frozen since 1993 and “currently have little meaningful relationship to the level of uncompensated care in a state,” according to the federal Medicaid and CHIP Payment Access Commission. New York accounts for about 6 percent of the low-income population DSH is supposed to benefit, but currently receives 15 percent of the funding.

In short, DSH is a long-standing dysfunctional mess that Schumer and the rest of Congress have been kicking down the road for a quarter-century. Judging from Tuesday’s head-spinning press conference, New Yorkers can expect more of the same.

About the Author

Bill Hammond

As the Empire Center’s senior fellow for health policy, Bill Hammond tracks fast-moving developments in New York’s massive health care industry, with a focus on how decisions made in Albany and Washington affect the well-being of patients, providers, taxpayers and the state’s economy.

Read more by Bill Hammond

You may also like

Lawmakers Seek To Revive a $10 Fee for Prescriptions That Was Dropped by DFS

A plan to require a $10.18 "dispensing fee" for filling drug prescriptions is back on the table in Albany – this time in the form of legislation rather than regulation. The Read More

How a Medicaid ‘Cut’ Could Lead to More Unionization of Home Care Aides

A money-saving maneuver in the newly enacted Medicaid budget could end up increasing costs in the long term – by paving the way for more unionization of the state's burgeoning home health workforce. Read More

Budget Deal Slows Medicaid Growth But Plants Seeds for Future Spending

The growth of New York's Medicaid spending is projected to slow but not stop as Governor Hochul and the Legislature effectively split their differences over health care in the newly enacted state budget. Read More

Albany’s New Health Insurance Tax Comes with Few Limits

The newly enacted state budget imposes a multibillion-dollar tax on health insurance without specifying who must pay how much – leaving those basic details to be decided later by the health commissioner in negotiation wit Read More

While New York’s Medicaid Budget Soared, Public Health Funding Languished

Four years after a devastating pandemic, the state has made no major investment to repair or improve its public health defenses. While funding for Medicaid over the past four years Read More

A Medicaid Grant Recipient Sponsors a Pro-Hochul Publicity Campaign

While much of the health-care industry is attacking Governor Hochul's Medicaid budget, at least one organization is rallying to her side: Somos Community Care, a politically active medical group in the Bronx that recently r Read More

Loss of Patients and Revenue Foreshadowed Downsizing for SUNY Downstate

The SUNY-owned hospital in Brooklyn facing a newly announced downsizing plan has seen its patient volume and revenue plunge over the past decade, according to a review of its financial reports. Read More

How a Medicaid Program To Improve Nursing Home Care Ended Up Paying for Union Benefits

New York State's budget-making process sometimes works like a closed loop, as interest groups on the receiving end of state spending reinvest a portion of their proceeds to lobby Albany for still more money. Read More